===== PDF PAGE 1 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Clty ae WEST CHICAGO WHERE HISTORY & PROGRESS MEET DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Monday, April 8, 2019 7:00 P.M. - Council Chambers AGENDA Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of a Quorum Approval of Minutes A. March 11, 2019 Public Participation Items for Consent A. Plat of Consolidation, 125 Wood Street B. First Amendment to the Water Treatment Plant PUD, 1400 W. Hawthorne C. Special Uses and Plat of Consolidation, 1817 Blackhawk D. Special Uses and Variances, 1850 West Roosevelt E. Variance Requests, 555 Innovation Drive (DuPage Business Park) Items for Discussion A. RFP for Central-Main Street Redevelopment Area Unfinished Business New Business Reports from Staff Adjournment 475 Main Street | T (630) 293-2200 Ruben Pineda West Chicago, Illinois F (630) 293-3028 isin 60185 www.westchicago.org Nancy M. Smith Michael L. Guttman CITY ADMINISTRATOR ===== PDF PAGE 2 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Draft MINUTES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE March 11, 2019, 7:00 P.M. 1, Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of a Quorum. Alderman Stout called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Roll call found Aldermen James Beifuss, Melissa Birch Ferguson, Michael Ferguson, Bonnie Gagliardi, Jayme Sheahan and Rebecca Stout present. Also in attendance was Community Development Director, Tom Dabareiner. 2. Approval of Minutes. A. February 11, 2019. Alderman Birch Ferguson moved and Alderman Sheahan seconded a motion to approve the minutes. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Birch Ferguson, Ferguson, Gagliardi, Sheahan and Stout. Voting Nay: 0. 33 Public Participation. Phil Saas, petitioner from Agenda Item 4A, informed the members he was present to answer any questions they might have. 4, Items for Consent. A. 123 N. Aurora, Special Use Permits for Motor Vehicle Care and Motor Vehicle Repair Facility. B. Resolution to adopt Official City of West Chicago 2019 Zoning Map. Development Committee Minutes March 11, 2019 Page | of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 3 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Alderman Beifuss moved and Alderman Gagliardi seconded a motion to approve the minutes. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Birch Ferguson, Ferguson, Gagliardi, Sheahan and Stout. Voting Nay: 0. 5; Items for Discussion. A. Text Amendment to Regulate Pet Shops. Tom Dabareiner provided this item update. The City is seeking to create a series of text amendments to restrict the sale of dogs and cats from retail outlets to deter so-called “puppy and kitten mills”. Pet shops has been added as a permitted use in Zoning Districts B-1, B-2 and B-3 with a definition that would preclude the sale of dogs and cats. However, they would be allowed to collaborate with animal care or rescue organizations to have space to feature animals for adoption. These amendments would not affect any existing businesses in West Chicago. DuPage County took the initiative to ask communities in the area to adopt this effort, and Mr. Dabareiner mentioned he is aware of some other local cities that have already done so. He added that animals coming from these “mills” have more health problems and other issues that cause problems for the owners. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals (PC/ZBA) voted 4 to 2 in favor of this amendment at their March 5'", 2019 meeting. The dissenters questioned the legality of such a restriction and whether the prohibition is too broad in disallowing breeders from selling through a pet store. Alderman Beifuss said that he is in favor. He asked for clarification if the definition of a pet shop would not include breeders and Mr. Dabareiner confirmed it would not. Alderman Beifuss asked if pet shelters would be allowed in the B Zoning Districts, and Mr. Dabareiner believed that they probably would as rescue organizations are not prohibited. Responsible pet shop owners already choose to not sell animals from animal “mills,” although they may feature animals from rescue organizations. He added that a question arose whether a temporary use would be allowed where a store like Jewel could sell these types of animals. The answer is no, however, as their sales have to be related to their primary business, except for seasonal items. Alderman Birch Ferguson stated that she is in favor. Alderman Stout agreed, stating this is a step in the right direction. Animals bred in “mills” have more diseases and health problems. Only allowing for responsible pet sellers, such as responsible breeders and rescue organizations, would be something the City could be proud of. Development Committee Minutes March 11, 2019 Page 2 of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 4 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Alderman Gagliardi moved and Alderman Ferguson seconded a motion to approve the minutes. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Birch Ferguson, Ferguson, Gagliardi, Sheahan and Stout. Voting Nay: 0. Unfinished Business. None. New Business. None. Reports from Staff. Tom Dabareiner reported that U-Haul was hoping to be back for tonight’s meeting, but they were not ready to do so and hope to be present for the April meeting. He stated he anticipates a lengthy agenda for next month’s meeting, where the members will probably be reviewing plans for a new building in the DuPage Business Center. Adjournment. Alderman Birch Ferguson moved and Alderman Beifuss seconded the motion to adjourn the Development Committee meeting at 7:10 P.M. The Committee members unanimously agreed and the motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Jane Burke Development Committee Minutes March 11, 2019 Page 3 of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 5 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM TITLE: AGENDAITEMNUMBER: — ‘4. Plat of Consolidation 125 Wood Street FILE NUMBER: Edgerton Consolidation COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: April 8, 2019 Resolution No. 19-R-0022 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE ITEM SUMMARY: The owner of the two lots at 125 Wood, Patrick Edgerton, has submitted for a lot consolidation as re- quired by the City as a condition of developing a parking lot, gazebo and small storage building on the lots. A small office building is located on one lot and parking for the building on the adjacent lot. The lots total .58 acres and are zoned B-1, Central Business District. At its meeting on April 2, 2019, the Plan Commission/ZBA recommended approval of the lot consoli- dation by a 5-0 vote. ACTIONS PROPOSED: Consideration of Edgerton Lot Consolidation at 125 Wood Street. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: Pc: Resolution Plan Commission Recommendation (Exhibit “B”) Plat of Consolidation ===== PDF PAGE 6 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] RESOLUTION NO. 19-R-0022 A RESOLUTION APPROVING EDGERTON LOT CONSOLIDATION 125 WOOD STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of West Chicago, in regular session assembled as follow: Section 1. That the Final Plat of Edgerton Lot Consolidation, as prepared by Stacy Ferguson Land Surveying, Inc., consisting of one (1) sheet attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit “A”, be and the same is hereby approved and that the Mayor and City Clerk and all other necessary and appropriate officers of the City are authorized to execute said plat. Section 2. That the recommendation and findings of the Plan Commission, pursuant to Recommendation No. 19-RC-0005, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B” be and the same are hereby adopted as the findings of the City Council. Section 3. That all resolutions or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are, to the extent of such conflict, expressly repealed. Section 4. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption and approval as provided by law. APPROVED this day of , 2019. AYES: NAYES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Mayor Ruben Pineda ATTEST: City Clerk Nancy M. Smith Resolution 19-R-0022 Page | of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 7 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “A” PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET), AS SAID STREET IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED IN THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO, DISTANCE 50.0 FEET NORTHERLY , MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN TRACT OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY AS SAID MAIN TRACK OF SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY WAS ORIGINALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF WOOD STREET, A DISTANCE OF 142.03 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 9.0 FEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY’S L.C.C. TRACK #606, AS SAID I.C.C. TRACK #606 IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF SAID IL.C.C. TRACK #606, A DISTANCE OF 308.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES A DISTANCE OF 23.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT DISTANCE 50.0 FEET NORTHWESTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SAID MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY’S ORIGINAL MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE A DISTANCE OF 240.85 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. COMMONLY KNOWN AS 125 WOOD STREET, WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60185 P.I.N. 04-09-211-001 PARCEL TWO: 5,395 SQUARE FEET OF NON-CARRIER REAL ESTATE LYING ON CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY RAILROAD PROPERTY, NORTHEAST OF WOOD STREET AND ADJACENT TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THAT PART OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET), AS SAID STREET IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED IN THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO, Resolution 19-R-0022 Page 2 of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 8 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] DISTANCE 50.0 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN TRACT OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY AS SAID MAIN TRACK OF SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY WAS ORIGINALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF WOOD STREET, A DISTANCE OF 142.03 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 9.0 FEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY’S L.C.C. TRACK #606, AS SAID LC.C, TRACK #606 IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF SAID L.C.C. TRACK #606, A DISTANCE OF 308.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES A DISTANCE OF 23.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT DISTANCE 50.0 FEET NORTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SAID MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY’S ORIGINAL MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE A DISTANCE OF 240.85 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; ALSO KNOWN AS THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADJACENT AND SOUTHERLY OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BEING PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET) AND 50 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, AS AFORESAID TRACK WAS ORIGINALLY LOCATED IN SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1482.40 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 47 SECONDS, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 242.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE AFORESAID RAILROAD; THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE STATION'GROUNDS OF THE AFORESAID RAILROAD EXTENDED SOUTHERLY, 24.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CIRCULAR CURVE , BEING 23.50 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID RAILROAD, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1458.90 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 10 SECONDS, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 227.54 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET); THENCE NORTH 15 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY Resolution 19-R-0022 Page 3 of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 9 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET), 23.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. P.I.N. 04-09-211-002 Resolution 19-R-0022 Page 4 of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 10 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “B’ RECOMMENDATION # 19-RC-0005 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: PC-19-03 Edgerton Lot Consolidation 125 Wood Street DATE: April 2, 2019 DECISION: The motion to approve the requested Resubdivision passed by a 5-0 vote. RECOMMENDATION After review of the proposed Edgerton Plat of Consolidation, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval. Respectfully submitted, Steve Hale Acting Chairman VOTE: For Against Abstain Absent Faught Dettman Henkin Laimins Devitt Kasprak Hale Resolution 19-R-0022 Page 5 of 3 ===== PDF PAGE 11 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EDGERTON'S PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS Original Scale: 1 inch = 20 ft. LAND AREA: PARCEL ONE 19,863.25 S.F. (0.455 AC.) PARCEL TWO 5,504.28 S.F. (0.126 AC.) TOTAL 25,367.53 S.F. (0.58 AC.) PARCEL ONE LEGEND. EXHIBIT "B" 1 of 2 SUBMITTED BY / RETURN TO: CITY OF WEST CHICAGO 475 MAIN STREET WEST CHICAGO, IL 60186 P.I.N. : 04-09-—211-—001 AND 04—09—211-—002 PREPARED FOR: EDGERTON & EDGERTON LAW OFFICES 125 WOOD STREET WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60186 SHEET 1 OF STACY FERGUSON LAND SURVEYING, INC. SURVEYING, CONSTRUCTION, DESIGN, DRAFTING, MAPPING, LAYOUT AND CONSULTING 239 E. WILSON STREET BATAVIA, ILLINOIS PHONE f (630) 879-0158 Scale: 1"=20' | Drawn by: DSB {CHK’D by: SLF | Job No. ===== PDF PAGE 12 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EDGERTON'S PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS OWNER STATE OF ILLINOIS) COUNTY OF ys i. Edy t (ron THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT Tidivfe L, 1S THE OWNER OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE ANNEXED PLAT, AND HAS CAUSED THE SAME TO BE PLATTED AND RECORDED AS SHOWN HEREON FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH AND DOES HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT THE SANE UNDER THE STYLE AND TITLE THEREON INDICATED. coms West Uren. Minot THIS 8% DAY OF ‘Necem 4 Ta KO. 20 LE NAME “AND TITLE NAME AND ‘THLE NOTARY STATE OF ILUNOIS) Iss. COUNTY OF ) pitty LE COOL T Ly sony ruse m0 FOR SAD COUNTY IN THE STATE AFORESAID, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT Pow 1- Ehfev Pn PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE ‘SAME’ PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND APPEARED BEFORE ME THIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY SIGNED AND DELIVERED THE ANNEXED PLAT AS THEIR OWN FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH AND HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPT THE SAME UNQER THE STYLE AND TITLE THEREON SHOWN. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL mas AB oy of — DPCM py wo ¥ . ILUNOIS OFFICIAL SEAL HAILEY LIMBRICK NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS My Commission Expires 03/27/2022 COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS STATE OF ILLINOIS) )ss. COUNTY OF DUPAGE) THIS INSTRUMENT NO. WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS ON THIS DAY OF AD. 20 AT ______ O'CLOCK ___u. AND WAS RECORDED IN BCCK _____ oF PLATS ON PAGE DUPAGE COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS COUNTY CLERK STATE OF ILUNOIS) )S.s. COUNTY OF DUPAGE) 4, . COUNTY CLERK OF DU PAGE COUNTY, ILUNOIS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO DELINQUENT CENERAL TAXES, NO UNPAID FORFEMTED TAXES AND NO REDEEMABLE TAX SALES AGAINST ANY OF THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE ANNEXED PLAT. |_ FURTHER CERTIFY THAT | HAVE RECEIVED ALL STATUTORY FEES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNEXED PLAT GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL AT WHEATON, DU PAGE COUNTY, ILUNOIS, THIS DAY OF + 20. COUNTY CLERK CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATE STATE OF iLUNO'S) )ss COUNTY OF DUPAGE) 1, ________________ wayoR OF THE CiTy OF WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, 00 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ANNEXED PLAT WAS PRESENTED TO AND BY RESOLUTON ______"_ uy APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO AT TS REGULAR MEETING HELD ON AO. 20___. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I HAVE HEREUNTO SET THE SEAL OF THE CIY OF WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS. WaAYOR ATTEST: Cny CLERK SURVEYOR STATE OF ILLINOIS) )s.s. COUNTY OF KANE) PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET), AS SAID STREET IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED IN THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO, DISTANT 50.0 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN TRACT OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY AS SAID MAIN TRACK OF SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY WAS ORIGINALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF WOOD STREET, A DISTANCE OF 142.03 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 9.0 FEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S 1.C.C. TRACK #606, AS SAID I.C.C. TRACK #606 IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER UNE OF SAID |. TRACK #606, A DISTANCE OF 308.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES A DISTANCE OF 23.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT CISTANT SO.0 FEET NORTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SAID MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY'S ORIGINAL MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE A DISTANCE OF 240.85 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 125 WOOD STREET, WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60185 PLN: 04-09-211-001 PARCEL TWO: 5,395 SQUARE FEET OF NON-CARRIER REAL ESTATE LYING ON CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY RAILROAD PROPERTY, NORTHEAST OF WOOD STREET AND ADJACENT TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THAT PART OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, SITUATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET). AS SAD STREET IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED IN THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO, DISTANT 50.0 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF MAIN TRACT OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY AS SAID MAIN TRACK OF SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY WAS ORIGINALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE OF WOOD STREET, A DISTANCE OF 142.03 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 9.0 FEET SOUTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S I.C.C. TRACK $606, AS SAID I.C.C. TRACK #606 IS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CENTER LINE OF SAID I.C.C. TRACK $606, A DISTANCE OF 308.6 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES A DISTANCE OF 23.97 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT DISTANT 50.0 FEET NORTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FRCM SAID ORIGINAL CENTER LINE OF SAID MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY'S ORIGINAL MAIN TRACK CENTER LINE A DISTANCE OF 240.85 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING; ALSO KNOWN AS THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIF' 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ADJACENT AND SOUTHERLY OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE CHICAGO NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BEING PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EXISTING EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET) AND SO FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, AS AFORESAID TRACK WAS ORIGINALLY LOCATED IN SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD, BEING A CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1482.40 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 47 SECONDS, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 242.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE AFORESAID RAILROAD; THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE STATION GROUNDS OF THE AFORESAID RAILROAD EXTENDED SOUTHERLY, 24.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CIRCULAR CURVE, BEING 23.50 FEET SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF AFORESAID RAILROAD, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1458.90 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 8 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 10 SECONDS, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 227.54 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET); THENCE NORTH 15 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WOOD STREET (FORMERLY ELGIN STREET), 23.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PLN. 04-09-211-002 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 1, STACY L. FERGUSON AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE PLATTED FOR EASEMENT PURPOSES THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY FOR THE PURPOSES OF GRANTING THE SAME FOR SAID PURPOSES AND THAT THE PLAT HEREON DRAWN IS A REPRESENTATION OF SAID GRANT OF EASEMENT. SCALE OF MAP IS 20 FEET PER ONE INCH. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL THIS 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER AD. 2018, IN BATAVIA, ILLINOIS. ay. L. Furgueen ILLINOIS PROFESS{ONAL LAND SURVEYOR 7. 035-002952 UCENSE EXPIRGS/ NOVEMBER 30, 2020 2 of 2 PREPARED FOR: EDGERTON & EDGERTON LAW OFFICES 125 WOOD STREET WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60186 EXHIBIT "B" SHEET 2 OF 2 STACY FERGUSON LAND SURVEYING, INC. SURVEYING, CONSTRUCTION, DESIGN, DRAFTING. MAPPING, LAYOUT AND CONSULTING 239 E WILSON STREET BATAVIA, ILLINOIS PHONE # (630) 879-0158 Seale: 1"=20' [Drown by: ose [cHK’D by sur [ob No | ===== PDF PAGE 13 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM TITLE: B AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: +.B, First Amendment to the Water Treatment Plant PUD at 1400 W. Hawthorne Lane FILE NUMBER: COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: Apr. 8, 2019 Ordinance No. 19-O-0011 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE ITEM SUMMARY: The City of West Chicago requests approval of the first amendment to the Water Treatment Plant PUD to allow the placement of a salt storage shed. The Water Treatment Plant PUD address is rec- orded as 1400 W. Hawthorne Lane, while the salt storage shed will maintain its own address inside the 24-acre PUD area at 1350 W. Hawthorne Lane. The Water Treatment Plant PUD was adopted in 2005 by Ordinance No. 05-O0-0065. A copy is attached for your reference. The property is zoned M, Manufacturing and the City’s Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Institutional. All aspects of the City’s Manufacturing zoning district apply to the PUD except that the use list must be expanded to include the salt storage facility. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals voted 5-0 in favor of the amendment. That recom- mendation is included as Exhibit “B” of the attached ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 05-0-0065 Draft Ordinance Approving the First Amendment to the Water Treatment Plant PUD Plan Commission/ZBA Recommendation (attached as Exhibit “B” to the Ordinance) ACTION PROPOSED: Consideration of First Amendment to the Water Treatment Plant PUD. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: ===== PDF PAGE 14 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] ORDINANCE NO. 19-O-0011 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL PUD OF THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1400 HAWTHORNE LANE WHEREAS, on or about February 15, 2019, the City of West Chicago (the "APPLICANT"), filed an application for approval of a First Amendment to the final PUD plan, with respect to the property legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "SUBJECT REALTY"); and, WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing on said application was published in the Daily Herald on or about March 18, 2019, all as required by the ordinances of the City of West Chicago and the statutes of the State of Illinois; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Chicago, commencing on April 2, 2019, pursuant to said Notice; and, ’ WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT provided testimony in support of its application, and all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and, WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago have received the recommendation of the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals which contains specific findings of fact, pursuant to Recommendation No. 2019-RC-0006, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" which is, by this reference, incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West Chicago, Du Page County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows: Section 1. That this Ordinance shall constitute approval of the following documents, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit "C", which are, by this reference, incorporated herein. All construction, use, operation, and maintenance shall be in substantial conformance with said documents, though as amended to comply with the conditions imposed in Section 1. 1. The development shall be in substantial compliance with the Site Plan prepared by Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc. Consulting Engineers, dated November of 2002 with the latest revision on March 17, 2003. 2. The Site Plan of March 17, 2003, shall be amended in part by the Site Plan prepared by Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. dated February 19, 2019 showing a salt storage facility and related improvements. Section 2. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, shall, to the extent not expressly modified by the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, remain in full force and effect as therein provided. ===== PDF PAGE 15 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Section 3. That the recommendations of the Plan Commission/ Zoning Board of Appeals previously incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" be and the same are hereby adopted as the findings of fact of the City Council. Section 4. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. PASSED this day of 2019. Alderman Beifuss a Alderman Chassee Alderman Sheahan ee Alderman Brown _ Alderman Hallett = Alderman Ferguson _ Alderman Birch-Ferguson _ Alderman Dimas ee Alderman Swiatek _ Alderman Garling | Alderman Stout ee Alderman Short a Alderman Ligino-Kubinski Alderman Gagliardi APPROVED as to form: City Attorney APPROVED THIS day of 2019. Mayor Ruben Pineda ATTEST: City Clerk Nancy M. Smith PUBLISHED: ===== PDF PAGE 16 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “A” Subject Realty Legal Description PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COMMENCING AT A BRASS PLATE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID QUARTER SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 1320.58 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 5 OF MACQUEEN ESTATES, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 22 OF PLATS ON PAGE 33 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 381949; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION A DISTANCE OF 33.01 FEET TO THE EXISTING SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HAWTHORNE LANE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 5, A DISTANCE OF 1233.76 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE MICHAEL WURTZ FARM, ALONG BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5, LOT 2 OF OWEN LARSON’S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 159 OF PLATS ON PAGE 110 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER R92-217425, LOTS 3, 2B, 2A OF SAID MACQUEEN ESTATES, AND THE SOUTH LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER R95- 094738, A DISTANCE OF 949.53 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT OF LAND; THENCE NORTH 08 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 1250.61 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID HAWTHORNE LANE; THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE FOLLOWING 5 COURSES; (1) NORTH 88 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 432.75 FEET, (2) SOUTH 00 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 17.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 OF OWEN LARSON’S SUBDIVISION, (3)NORTH 88 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 206.48 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER LOT OF SAID OWEN LARSON’S SUBDIVISION, (4) NORTH 00 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.01 FEET, (5) NORTH 88 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 137.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 24.36 ACRES (1,061,128 SQ.FT) P.LN. 04-05-200-038 ===== PDF PAGE 17 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “B” RECOMMENDATION NO. 2019-RC-0006 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: PC 19-08 Amendment to the Public Works Water Treatment Plant Planned Unit Development City of West Chicago 1400 West Hawthorne Lane DATE: April 2, 2019 DECISION: The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously (5-0 vote) recommended approval of an amendment to the Public Works Water Treatment Plant Planned Unit Development to construct an 8,400 square foot salt storage facility. RECOMMENDATION: After holding a public hearing and after review of the requested amendment to the Public Works Water Treatment Plant Planned Unit Development, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the amendment and finds that the final plan and plat are deemed to be sufficient in compliance with all applicable City ordinances and in substantial conformity with the approved Planned Unit Development Plan and Plat. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the amendment to the Planned Unit Development subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The site layout shall be in substantial conformance with the plans prepared by Christopher B. Burke Engineering Ltd. dated January 28, 2019, attached as Exhibit D. 2. The salt storage structure shall be in substantial conformance with the plans prepared by Bulk Storage dated February 20, 2019, attached as Exhibit E Respectfully submitted, Steve Hale Acting Chairman ===== PDF PAGE 18 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] For Devitt Hale Kasprak Faught Henkin Against VOTE: Abstain Absent Dettman Laimins ===== PDF PAGE 19 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT"C" ===== PDF PAGE 20 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXISTING WATER TREATMENT PLANT “——| . 1400 W. HAWTHORNE LANE j He HAWTHORNE LANE “70'X.120°~ — SALT STORAGI “FACILITY | EXISTING | 7000 sa FT | STORAGE | BUILDING 1300 W. HAWTHORNE LANE 40° -----0 40 307 > 2 120 — i SCALE IN FEET Cc B CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 (847) 823-0500 CLIENT: KEM City of West Chicago _ BLL VAR. NUM. 40° PLOT DATE: 2/19/2019 CAD USER: IJmiller INO.| DATE NATURE OF REVISION CHKD. | MODEL: Default FILE NAME IN:\WESTCHICAGO\IT0260.00003\CIvII\ExhibIts\EXH-D_170260.3.0GN TITLE: PUD AMENDMENT SITE PLAN FOR SALT STORAGE FACILITY AT 1350 W. HAWTHORNE LANE PROJ. NO. 170260.00003 DATE: 01/28/19 SHEET 1 OF 1 ORAWING NO. EXH D ===== PDF PAGE 21 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] weesersryeeoey ST ae i EI IEE sepmneee ome — Se PE SL FED EB AI OO LEONE GIT LE et — a pei SASSER PRES SSL, EA EEN aS rr \ PS TS eds 36° CLOSED LOUVER conmeious einaten mes — SSS a PH An PANELS TRANSLUCENT FIBERGLASS STEEL COILING a Tit il pty > { i + He | i Hi fe 0 ny Ll Mt Ui “i i 7 | Hl i i I lu REX UAE RRUAT AAT PATA ERG ELAR CAR PAN YAU EA PATEK Ay HOY ONE TMT EUAN ARAN CATER VRE RAEN CAN YEN UE TET LTT AAU OAK OG ON ARTA ELA PAAR ATT ATT EE Dl i "Reeves: ALL i we va 'Z FLASHING © JOINTS : ( LUN a ) Ha i HN CC i i ey - / a METAL GUTTER PRE-FINISHED 6) HE i li j ‘6° STAINED TRI 7 nl | | nt Hl We nih ll | ' i yy] il Hall ii ae »> a Tle] PLYWOOD SIDING i | i HT | | ill (AY Al | | i il iH yl ra | | i [| lil il) Lo | U7 Ht | I a ul l 7 7 i | HM »OZ= il til at ii it iit Hil il iii! Hi) mn ui THI Hit I i : ud Hl fli 1 TT i Il i ull nt in rll i itt 1 | tl v nt) IY. OLO — 4 amt fOr vx —,— Ly = Ly y bk +U = Hl | 3068 FIBERGLASS rid Itt tt 1d rit itt 1 | 1 H —— ! i 1 —__ ' ! i i — H trie I7Q SERVICE DOOR Ltd Ld Pride ee t t 1 1 1 ! | 1 ! | 1 if 1 ! t ! Lid WO Q a STEEL ROLL-UP DOOR 1O'-O° X 30'-O* OPENING WW qf | i REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION i SCALE: 1/8's|'-O' SCALE: 1/8*sI'-O i 8 fl i rs 2-20-8 EI 36° DIA, CLOSED LOUVER d SS jo pmaeo nae vem am iS All| ff {i il! ill | Ip in oven sncits > im STEEL COILING nt ili] i | “il ff i auf nis ALUMINUM DRIP EDGE: 1-30-20 ; OH. DOOR a (i (Ae fil | i | Wi AH Wy Me Me Be, Ht 4 FI IN ii i ili H Hua | lo OAR ENE AEN AR ARENA TOG TT MUM OT Tn ee mes il (1! i ills | iH it | Hill i 8° STAINED RAKE TRIM nk eit ity Hh Him Ly ne i Hu HITED % i UCENT FIBERGLASS oe 9a geo PEEASTON TT Hf] li 1! i wilt i ) 'Z’ FLASHING © JOINTS PANELS CONT! ae& i i! i | | Ha (i ‘iN O3:: $28 vo | Ii Hit Pmt HH PRE-FINISHED @ 8 Fo ug bid Z| . (i ny HI i W lit itt rift HH DD \ METAL GUTTER TWH TT TT 7505 Zuo@ 8 i hii Hl ih il i Hit | i il et il : ay iH | ATH i | TM ll il ii ne ill tH] TH uli (ill 1 i {| HW T il ! TNT TT TANT | TT rt TH {4 h=oz fH Hi HE il We ef A Ti-ll PLYWOOD — | LC TT ll ‘| | | iil i Ht | i Ht I il HA i| iH wl 3535 or38 7 lu iit li Ly Hu li js ip T° STAINED TRIM : i | GU | Hl al jl aabz ewok S960 UE HE Ui Hin Ui LM ctl | ill iti iil i HA ty Ha ii HEAL il i il En i nl Sees mapa li = wotwamome a” @ — FE SISTIDy, " ceieeniee ea | \ WING WALLS fl Ss] 3068 FIBERGLASS riod tt 1 tt 1 Priye rrit ——£, ! [ ' Prrd DATE SERVICE DOOR jl td rrid tot -d touaJd t---4Jd | t-+-Jd LJ ' er | i] 1 L~~J ! | Seen | 1 LIts rid 222013 a | AS NOTED 23'-o* 20'-0' nie a TRERETSES contd CONC. PAD FOR WING WALLS DOUN 48° 4 JOB NG. Ny @° X 30'-O° OPENING WY STEEL ROLL-UP DOOR 6° STL. PIPE BOLLARD (PAINTED) A ‘SHaer XC CONC. GRADE BEAM DOUN 48! RIGHT ELEVATION ii FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"s1'-D SCALE: 1/8*sI'-O ere ELST SEL SED SIGNED ER, LER SE TST SY TE: ESSE ewe agQnnramirmernseeceate ee ED BIS ESTE ELEN TE ESE NII LE See Ser ESLER LIPS TE FL OLLIE SLOT CREE LLY BLN SPER EE OLY GLEE EE EIRI CLS EB EERE IGE IIA LL ENE LENE ERTS smoire: TST CS LES BES SEES IRE LL | on CRE 4 SHasTS J ===== PDF PAGE 22 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] ORDINANCE NO. 05-0-0065 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PUD PLAN OF THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1400 HAWTHORNE LANE WHEREAS, on or about July 1, 2005, the City of West Chicago (the “APPLICANT”, filed an application for approval of a preliminary and final PUD plan, with respect to the property legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “SUBJECT REALTY”); and, WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing on said application was published in the Daily Herald on or about July 15, 2005, all as required by the ordinances of the City of West Chicago and the statutes of the State of Illinois; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Chicago, commencing on August 2, 2005, pursuant to said Notice; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT provided testimony in support of its application, and all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and, WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago have received the recommendation of the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals which contains specific findings of fact, pursuant to Recommendation No. 1018, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” which is, by this reference, incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West Chicago, Du Page County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows: Section 1. That this Ordinance shall constitute approval of the following document, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “C”, which is, by this reference, incorporated herein. All construction, use, operation, and maintenance shall be in substantial conformance with said document, though as amended to comply with the conditions imposed in Section 1. 1. The development shall be in substantial compliance with the Site Plan prepared by Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc. Consulting Engineers, dated November of 2002 with the latest revision on March 17, 2003, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “C”, which is, by this reference, incorporated herein. Section 2. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, shall, to the extent not expressly modified by the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, remain in full force and effect as therein provided, Ordinance 05-0-0065 Page | of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 23 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Section 3, That the recommendations of the Plan Commission/ Zoning Board of Appeals previously incorporated herein as Exhibit “B” be and the same are hereby adopted as the findings of fact of the City Council. Section 4, That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. PASSED this 15" day of August 2005. AldermanL, Chassee (o4eara% asaceman 3. Beatusa Alderman H. R. Monroe le Lay Qe Alderman G. Kauth Alderman R. Pineda Alderman R. Radkiewicz Alderman N. Kifer Assian Alderman S. Dimas Alderman M. Kwasman thse Alderman G. Bunch Bay? Alderman R. Stout Alderman N. Connelly Alderman A. Murphy Alderman N, Dzierzanowski JaSS Alderman D, Abruzzo deh Mayor M. Fortner feat yee APPROVED as to form: City Attorney APPROVED this 15" day of August 2005. Wt hh Kp —_. Mayor Michael R. Fortner ATTEST: ALL anal Nancy M. Smith, City Clerk PUBLISHED: Ordinance 05-0-0065 Page 2 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 24 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “A” ORDINANCE NO. 05-0-0065 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 5, Township 39 North, Range 9 East of the Third Principal Meridian, DuPage County, Illinois, commencing at a brass plate at the northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 5; thence South 88 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds West, along the north line of said Quarter Section, a distance of 1320.58 feet to the northerly extension of the east line of Lot 5 of MACQUEEN ESTATES, as recorded in Book 22 of Plats on Page 33 as Document Number 381949; thence South 00 degrees 27 minutes 55 seconds West along said northerly extension a distance of 33.01 fect to the existing south right of way line of Hawthorne Lane, the POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract herein described; thence continuing South 00 degrees 27 minutes 55 seconds West, along the east line of said Lot 5, a distance of 1233.76 feet to the southeast corner of said Lot 5; thence South 88 degrees 52 minutes 58 seconds West, along the north line of the Michael Wurtz Farm, also being the south line of said Lot 5, Lot 2 of OWEN LARSON’S SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Book 159 of Plats on Page 110 as Document Number R92-217425, Lots 3, 2B, and 2A of said MACQUEEN ESTATES, and the south line of a tract of land recorded in Document Number R95-094738, a distance of 949.53 feet to the southwest corner of said tract of land; thence North 08 degrees 23 minutes 51 seconds East, along the west line of said tract, a distance of 1250.61 feet to the south right of way line of said Hawthorne Lane; thence along said right of way for the following 5 courses; (1)North 88 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 432.75 feet, (2)South 00 degrees 26 minutes 15 seconds West, a distance of 17.01 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 1 of OWEN LARSON’S SUBDIVISION, (3)North 88 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 206.48 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 2 of said OWEN LARSON’S SUBDIVISION, (4)North 00 degrees 26 minutes 28 seconds East, a distance of 17.01 feet, (5)North 88 degrees 53 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 137.65 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 24.36 acres (1,061,128 sq.ft.) P.LN.’s: 04-05-200-002, 04-05-200-003, 04-05-200-004, 04-05-200-029, 04-05-200-030, 04-05- 200-034, 04-05-200-035, 04-05-200-036 and 04-05-200-037. Ordinance 05-0-0065 Page 3 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 25 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “B” RECOMMENDATION #1018 ORDINANCE 05-0-0065 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: PC 05-26 Preliminary and Final PUD plan City of West Chicago Water Treatment Plant 1400 Hawthorne Lane DATE: August 8, 2005 DECISION: The motion to approve the request passed 4-0. RECOMMENDATION After review of the requested preliminary and final PUD, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals (PC/ZBA) recommended approval according to the following findings of fact: (1) In what respects the proposed plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the stated purpose and intent of the PUD regulations: The proposed plan is designed to be compatible with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and intent of the regulations established as part of this PUD. The use of the site as a public utility facility with ancillary storage facilities is in compliance with the comprehensive plan designation of Industrial. (2) The extent to which the proposed plan meets the requirements and standards of the PUD regulations: The proposed plan meets all of the necessary requirements and standards of the PUD regula- tions as defined in Section 15 of the West Chicago Zoning Ordinance. Some of the submittal requirements such as a traffic study and tax study were not required because this is an existing facility and is a City facility which has no tax impact. (3) The extent to which the proposed plan departs from the zoning and subdivision regulations otherwise applicable to the subject property including, but not limited to, the density, dimen- sion, area, bulk and use and the reasons why such departures are deemed to be in the public interest: Ordinance 05-0-0065 Page 4 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 26 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] The proposed plan complies with the zoning and subdivision regulations, with the exception of allowing two principle structures on a lot, which is necessary to keep equipment segre- gated from the water treatment facility. The development has an extremely low density of approximately .05 far. (4) The method by which the proposed plan makes adequate provision for public services, provides adequate control over vehicular traffic, provides for and protects designated common open space and furthers amenities of light and air, recreation and visual enjoyment: The proposed plan is low intensity and generates minimal traffic. There are 24 employees that report to the 24.38 acre site, which also contains significant open space. (5) The relationship and compatibility of the proposed plan to the adjacent properties and neighborhood: The proposed plan is compatible with the surrounding manufacturing area, and is set back from all property boundaries more than minimum setbacks. Significant landscaping is also provided on site, with additional plantings planned for the future. (6) The desirability of the proposed plan as regards physical development, tax base and economic well being of the City: The proposed plan is vital to the economic well-being of the City by providing water treat- ment, as well as a storage area for equipment. It brings the City’s system into compliance with IEPA standards and increased its water service capacity to serve residents and busi- nesses coming to West Chicago. Respectfully submitted, Stephen Jarolin Chairman VOTE: For Against Abstain Absent S. Jarolin G. Solis J. Hale B. Walz B. Lemon J. Warbiany Ordinance 05-0-0065 Page 5 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 27 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “C” INSERT SITE PLAN HERE Ordinance 05-0-0065 Page 6 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 28 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF DU PAGE_) CERTIFICATE I, Nancy Smith, Certify that I am the duly elected and acting City Clerk of the City of West Chicago, DuPage County, Illinois. I further Certify that on August 16, 2005 the Corporate Authorities of such municipality passed and approved Ordinance 05-O-0065 entitled AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PUD PLAN OF THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO WATER TREATMENT PLANT 1400 HAWTHORNE LANE 7—_eoereoeee ee eee Oe ee Which provided by its terms that it should be published in pamphlet form. The pamphlet form of Ordinance No. 05-O-0065 including the ordinance and a cover sheet hereof was prepared, and a copy of such ordinance posted in the municipal building, commencing on August 16, 2005 continuing for at least ten days thereafter. Copies of such ordinance were also available for public inspection upon request in the Office of the City Clerk. Dated at West Chicago, Illinois, this 15" day of August 2005. SEAL Nancy Smith] City Clerk ===== PDF PAGE 29 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] 48 luvogn wed9ete 20/62/6 Yd ‘30 10d na CITY of WEST CHicAGO ILLINOIS ===== PDF PAGE 30 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM TITLE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: a Special Use Permit and Lot Consolidation, 1817 Black- hawk Drive FILE NUMBER: COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: Apr. 8, 2019 Ordinance No. 19-O-0015 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE ITEM SUMMARY: Nicoleangela Building LLC, d/b/a Rai Concrete, requests a Special Use Permit and Lot Consolidation for its business located at 1827 Blackhawk Drive. The Special Use would allow ancillary outdoor stor- age on an adjacent lot in accord with Section 11.2-4(T) of the Zoning Ordinance. The Lot Consolida- tion falls under the Subdivision Regulations Code and would turn the two lots into one, making it con- sistent with the requirement found in Section 6.10 of the Zoning Ordinance. Rai Concrete was granted a Special Use Permit in 1998 to allow a contractor's office and outside storage at 1827 Blackhawk Drive, and it was subsequently developed along those lines. In 2018, the City became aware that Rai Concrete was using a neighboring property (currently addressed as 1817 Blackhawk Drive) for the storage of vehicles and materials related to its business, as well. A code en- forcement action was initiated, prompting the owner to begin the new Special Use application pro- cess. The activity on the neighboring lot also necessitates the lot combination with the property at 1827 Blackhawk Drive. In considering the action, several conditions are included with the recommendation for approval: 1. The outside storage yard is permitted only as an ancillary use to the existing contractor's office. 2. A Plat of Consolidation consolidating Parcels 01-32-301-020 and 01-32-301-019 into one (1) parcel shall be recorded prior to the issuance of development permits. 3. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Preliminary Engineering Plans prepared by Craig R. Knoche & Associates dated August 17, 2018, revised November 29, 2018. 4. Shrubs shall be added between the five (5) trees on the south side of the storage area, west of the driveway. Shrubs shall be three (3) to five (5) gallons in size and either equally spaced be- tween the shade trees or grouped in an appropriate manner as determined by the applicant's landscape architect. 5. The applicant's engineer shall verify that the comments in the Kane-DuPage Soil & Water Conservation District's Land Use Opinion 18-032 dated March 6, 2018 have been adequately addressed. 6. The petitioner shall apply for a Site Development Permit within sixty (60) of City Council ap- proval for the Special Use Permit and Lot Consolidation. If a Site Development Permit is not applied for within this timeframe, all storage/parking shall be removed immediately from Parcel ===== PDF PAGE 31 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] 01-21-301-020 or code enforcement action will be undertaken. 7. Development of the expanded storage yard shall be completed no later than December 31, 2019, unless an extension is approved by the Community Development Director. The property is zoned M, Manufacturing, as are all its neighboring properties. The Comprehensive Plan shows the area as Industrial. No Plat of Consolidation was received in advance of preparation of this report, so the Lot Consolida- tion will be handled at a later date. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals members considered Special Use Findings of Fact and voted 5-0 in support of both the Special Use Permit, handled by the attached Ordinance, and the Lot Consolidation, to be handled at a later date. The Ordinance approval includes the conditions. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance ACTION PROPOSED: Consideration of Special Use Permit and Lot Consolidation for 1817 Blackhawk Drive. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: ===== PDF PAGE 32 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] ORDINANCE NO. 19-0-0015 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR ANCILLARY OUTDOOR STORAGE AT 1827 BLACKHAWK DRIVE WHEREAS, on or about August 17, 2018, Nicoleangela Building LLC, d/b/a/ Rai Concrete Inc. (the “APPLICANT”), filed an application for a special use permit to establish ancillary outdoor storage to a special use at the property legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “SUBJECT REALTY”); and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing on said special use application was published in the Daily Herald on March 18, 2019, as required by the ordinances of the City of West Chicago and the statutes of the State of Illinois; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Chicago, commencing on April 2, 2019, pursuant to said Notice; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT provided testimony in support of its application, and all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and, WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago have received the recommendation of the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals which contains specific findings of fact, pursuant to Recommendation No. 2019-RC-0007, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” which is, by this reference, incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West Chicago, Du Page County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows: Section 1. That a special uses permit in conformance with Section 11.2-4(T) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby granted for the SUBJECT REALTY, to establish ancillary outdoor storage to a special use. Section 2. That the special use permit is hereby granted subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. The outside storage yard is permitted only as an ancillary use to the existing contractor’s office. 2. A Plat of Consolidation consolidating Parcels 01-32-301-020 and 01-32-301-019 into one (1) parcel shall be recorded prior to the issuance of development permits. 3. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Preliminary Engineering Plans prepared by Craig R. Knoche & Associates dated August 17, 2018, revised November 29, 2018. 4. Shrubs shall be added between the five (5) trees on the south side of the storage area, west of the driveway. Shrubs shall be three (3) to five (5) gallons in size and either equally spaced between the shade trees or grouped in an appropriate manner as determined by the applicant’s landscape architect. ===== PDF PAGE 33 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] 5. The applicant’s engineer shall verify that the comments in the Kane-DuPage Soil & Water Conservation District’s Land Use Opinion 18-032 dated March 6, 2018 have been adequately addressed. 6. The petitioner shall apply for a Site Development Permit within sixty (60) of City Council approval for the Special Use Permit and Lot Consolidation. If a Site Development Permit is not applied for within this timeframe, all storage/parking shall be removed immediately from Parcel 01-21-301-020 or code enforcement action will be undertaken. 7. Development of the expanded storage yard shall be completed no later than December 31, 2019, unless an extension is approved by the Community Development Director. Section 3. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. Section 4. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. PASSED this__ day of April, 2019 Alderman J. Beifuss ee Alderman L. Chassee —_—: Alderman J. Sheahan a Alderman H. Brown _ Alderman A. Hallett _ Alderman M. Ferguson — Alderman M. Birch-Ferguson_____ Alderman S. Dimas a Alderman C. Swiatek — Alderman M. Garling — Alderman R. Stout _ Alderman J. Short _ Alderman N. Ligino-Kubinski_ Alderman B. Gagliardi a APPROVED as to form: City Attorney ADOPTED this day of April, 2019. Ruben Pineda, Mayor ATTEST: ===== PDF PAGE 34 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] NancyM.Smith,City Clerk PUBLISHED: ===== PDF PAGE 35 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “A” Lots 2 & 3 in Batavia Land Co. Plat of Resubdivision of Lot 10 in West Chicago Industrial Center Unit No. 4, being a Resubdivision of part of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 3, Township 40 North, Range 9 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded November 17, 1997 as Document R97-76426, in DuPage County II. P.I.N.s: 01-32-301-019 and 01-32-301-020 ===== PDF PAGE 36 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “B” RECOMMENDATION NO. 2019-RC-0007 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: PC 18-12 Special Use Permit and Lot Consolidation Rai Concrete 1827 Blackhawk Drive DATE: April 2, 2019 DECISION: The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously (5-0 vote) recommended approval of a Special Use Permit for ancillary outdoor storage associated with the existing permitted contractor’s office at 1827 Blackhawk Drive and to consolidate two parcels, 01-32-301-020 and 01-32-301-019, into one lot. RECOMMENDATION: After holding a public hearing and after review of the requested special use permit and lot consolidation, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the lot consolidation and recommended approval of the special use permit according to the following findings of fact: (1) Is necessary for the public convenience at that location or, the case of existing noncon- forming uses, a special use permit will make the use more compatible with its surroundings: (This standard should be interpreted as indicating whether or not the proposed use is good for the public at that particular physical location, and not whether the use itself is needed there). The proposed outside storage expansion is best suited for an industrial area. The subject property is located within one of the City’s industrial areas and is compatible with the surrounding industrial and manufacturing uses. (2) Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected: The proposed use of the subject property should not adversely impact the public health, safety and welfare of the community. The adjacent parcel is developed as an outside storage yard and this is an expansion of that use. The proposed outdoor storage will be screened and located on a hard surface. ===== PDF PAGE 37 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] (3) Will not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located: The proposed outside storage yard should not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located. The proposed use is best suited for a industrial area and the subject property is located within one of the City’s industrial areas and is compatible with the surrounding industrial uses. (4) The proposed special use is designated by this code as a listed special use in the zoning district in which the property in question is located: The proposed outside storage/parking areas ancillary to the existing contractor’s office is listed as a special use under Section 11.2-4(T) of the Zoning Code. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the special use permit subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The outside storage yard is permitted only as an ancillary use to the existing contractor’s office. 2. A Plat of Consolidation consolidating Parcels 01-32-301-020 and 01-32-301-019 into one (1) parcel shall be recorded prior to the issuance of development permits. 4. The property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the Preliminary Engineering Plans prepared by Craig R. Knoche & Associates dated August 17, 2018, revised November 29, 2019. 5. Shrubs shall be added between the five (5) trees on the south side of the storage area, west of the driveway. Shrubs shall be three (3) to five (5) gallons in size and either equally spaced between the shade trees or grouped in an appropriate manner as determined by the applicant’s landscape architect. 6. The applicant’s engineer shall verify that the comments in the Kane-DuPage Soil & Water Conservation District’s Land Use Opinion 18-032 dated March 6, 2018 have been adequately addressed. 7. The petitioner shall apply for a Site Development Permit within sixty (60) of City Council approval for the Special Use Permit and Lot Consolidation. If a Site Development Permit is not applied for within this timeframe, all storage/parking shall be removed immediately from Parcel 01-21-301-020 or code enforcement action will be undertaken. 8. Development of the expanded storage yard shall be completed no later than December 31, 2019, unless an extension is approved by the Community Development Director. Respectfully submitted, . Steve Hale Acting Chairman ===== PDF PAGE 38 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] VOTE: For Against Abstain Absent Devitt Dettman Hale Laimins Kasprak Faught Henkin ===== PDF PAGE 39 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT "C" Scole 1"=20' LI Lyte : 15° LANDSCAPE : [om xs [scr lb PARKING REQUIREMENTS Existing Building Area ~ 4,000 sf Office Area ~ 325 sf PROPOSED 8 HIGH Warchowe Area ~ 3.475 sf MINYL FENCE is =r Parking Reqd (SEE DETAIL) Office Area = 4 Spaces per 1.000 sf - & = 4 * (525/100) = 2.1 Spaces Warehouse Area: 1 Space per 1,000 sf = 1 * (3475/1000) = 3.475 Spaces 1 Total Parking Required = 2.1 + 3.475 = 5.575 Spaces = 6 Spaces | EXSTING 8° HGH WNL FENCE LEGEND i & PROPOSED EXISTING “CURB & GUTTER aa CONCRETE = = ! z| | & ! oe | Q = PROPERTY UNE —_ --—— e wa) 1 Pee esoentT ' OVER 4° COMPACTED STONE B LANDSCAPE SETBACK ee me 2 ‘ SITE NOTES ALL DUENSIONS ARE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURE RADI ARE BACK OF CURS UNLESS OIMERMSE NOTED. CONTRACTOR TO VEREY DIVENSONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ANO NORFY ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCES ARE FOUND, SDEWALK AROUND PERIMETER OF BULDING SHALL BE WALK/PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWSE SPEOFED OV SOURACTOR MUL. BE RESPONSLE FOR REPAIRNG ALL DUSTING PAVEMENT DAUACED DURING CONSTRUCI ‘SEE CETALS FOR BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF DxTRANCE OF ROW. IN ACCORDANCE W/ RUNOYS 0.0.1. RECUREMENTS. ADA HANDICAP RAMPS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOCATIONS CELINEATED ON PLANS AS WELL AS AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SOEWALK ABUTS DRIVES OR ROADWAYS. 15° LANDSCAPE SETBACK SBe @ Ne ® A ENE E rt : ! 5 & IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS Existing Impervious Area ~ 31,882 sf of 0.73 acres Proposed Imperv 62,949 sfor_1.44 acres Net Impervious Area Increase = 31,067 sfor 0.71 acres 20" LANDSCAPE SETBACK 161.7" BLACKHAWK DRIVE WEST CHICAGO, ILUNOIS ee SITE PARKING LOT ADDITION Craig R Knoche & Associates :ertmeen | aynpa NEC BLACKHAWK DRIVE & HOWARD DRIVE Civil Engineers, P.C, hee ars cual C1. | Ts Pa Sa = — PLAN WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS exc somsrat «Ger Leos + lel eain efertonduasezs | spor aurea RAL CONCRETE, INC, ===== PDF PAGE 40 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT "D" '=20° Scale 1”: Toe : REAR YARD - 222 FT : PONTS REQD = 222 * 5 = 1,110 1 ; Seog ee Le rr Perr: | BOSTING 8’ HiGd a a . a Loital VIL FENCE ne ns ee Coed ; eS Ef _ of ea, : von : i 8 Dwar a an Deciduous Tree Plonting _— so a4 ns 5 = Q s " — xe LANDSCAPE POINT TOTALS PER YARD g FRONT YARD ~ PONTS REGO = 1,110 Fa FENCE LENGTH = 207 FT # 25 = S75 POMTS BS TOTAL PONTS PROWOED = THI25 PONTS ‘SOE YARD ~ PORTS REQD = 735 ie) FENCE LENGTH = 147 FT #25 = 3625 PONTS SHADE TREES = 4 TREES * 100 = 400 POTS LL TOTAL PONTS PROVED = 7875 PONTS REAR YARD — PONTS REOD = 1,110 FENCE LENGTH = 147 FT 25 = 3575 PONTS TOTAL PONTS PROVOED = 1175 PONTS Plont List ey’ "ome sax_ owen mae con Mat nouns, (4).3.0" ULM CS 8 ST le te ww, bee yee Sym Ter Momo a OL 7 SF Ome mateo prenerey = 8 ie Vert” pectode Ore J Bete y Si ed — i -- me 1 -- —— es fr 3¢ Rompe tums rent = Sova ope = 20° LANDSCAPE (6) 3.0” GTS SETBACK a Comean are Lita a FRONT YARD — 222 FT. POINTS REO = 222° 5 = 1,110 BLACKHAWK DRIVE REVISTON S LANDSCAPE PARKING LOT ADDITION Craig R. Knoche & Associates :ortoemen|l"" spss ————— PLAN NEC BLACKHAWK DRIVE & HOWARD DRIVE Civil Engineers, P.C, atten lass cual C4. | Bie aOR Saran TEEEIOT WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 2426 Set Sut» Ger koa + hora) tsi afer od tsinrs | a6 orl err na WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS RAI CONCRETE, INC, ===== PDF PAGE 41 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM TITLE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: — “f° 9. Special Uses and Variances for Internet Based Motor Vehicle Sales and Car Repair Center at 1850 W. Roo- sevelt Road FILE NUMBER: COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: Apr. 8, 2019 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: Ordinance No. 19-O-0012 =} STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE _/ ( y Be APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE ITEM SUMMARY: AAHH2 LLC, d/b/a CMI Auto, requests approval of special uses to establish an internet-based motor vehicle sales facility with a motor vehicle repair shop and motor vehicle care center at 1850 W. Roo- sevelt Road. Given certain existing constraints on the site, the petitioner also seeks several variances. The property is zoned M, Manufacturing and the Comprehensive Plan designates it as Office Re- search and Light Industrial. It was previously home to Cliff's Auto Body. The property includes an ac- cessory structure intended to be used as storage for the principle use. All employee vehicles and in- ventory will be parked in the rear behind a fence, except for customer vehicles which will park in the front, paved parking area. The variances will allow continued use of the customer parking area, which would be eliminated absent the variances. The Plan Commission/ZBA considered the Findings of Fact for both Special Use consideration and for the variances and voted 5-0 in favor of granting all of the requests. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals’ recommendation is included as Exhibit “B” of the attached ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance Approving the Special Uses and Variances Plan Commission/ZBA Recommendation (attached as Exhibit “B” to the Ordinance) Plat of Survey ACTION PROPOSED: Consideration of an Internet Based Motor Vehicle Sales Facility, with Motor Vehicle Repair Shop and Care Center, including several variances. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: ===== PDF PAGE 42 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] ORDINANCE NO. 19-O-0012 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING SPECIAL USE PERMITS AND CERTAIN VARIANCES FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR FACILITY AT 1850 WEST ROOSEVELT ROAD WHEREAS, on or about August 7, 2018, AAHH2 LLC (the “APPLICANT”), filed an application for special use permits to establish an internet based motor vehicle sales facility, along with a motor vehicle care center and a motor vehicle repair shop at the property legally described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “SUBJECT REALTY”); and, WHEREAS, a Notice of Public Hearing on said special use application was published in the Daily Herald on March 18, 2019, as required by the ordinances of the City of West Chicago and the statutes of the State of Illinois; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Chicago, commencing on April 2, 2019, pursuant to said Notice; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT provided testimony in support of its application, and all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and, WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago have received the recommendation of the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals, which contains specific findings of fact, pursuant to Recommendation No. 2019-RC-0008, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” which is, by this reference, incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West Chicago, Du Page County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows: Section 1. That three (3) special use permits in conformance with Sections 11.2-4(C), 11.2-4(DD) and11.2-4(GG) of the Zoning Ordinance are hereby granted for the SUBJECT REALTY, to establish an internet based motor vehicle sales shop, a motor vehicle repair shop and a motor vehicle care center at 1850 West Roosevelt Road. Section 2. That the special use permits are hereby granted subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. The SUBJECT REALTY shall be used in substantial conformance with the Plat of Survey prepare by Steinbrecher Land Surveyors, Inc. date July 12, 2018, including the hand drawn parking layout improvements and septic field location. 2. All vehicles to be sold or repaired, or that are in the process of being sold or repaired, shall be parked and stored inside the fenced storage area. 3. All business related vehicles (i.e. tow trucks, vehicle transports, etc.) shall be parked Ordinance 19-O-0012 Page 1 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 43 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] within the fenced storage area. 4. All employee parking shall be located within the fenced storage area. Slats shall be added to the existing chain-link fence to decrease the visibility of the storage area. No vehicles shall be parked within the Roosevelt Road right-of-way. All gravel surfaces shall be removed or paved prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. 8. The existing building on the eastern portion of the property shall be used only for storage of items related to the approved special uses on the property. No storage from any offsite uses may occur within the building. us EQN Section 3. That the SUBJECT REALTY is hereby granted a variance to allow a five-foot parking area setback along the north lot line where 20 feet is required and eliminate the 15-foot side yard parking area requirement in the M, Manufacturing District. Section 4. That the SUBJECT REALTY is hereby granted a variance to eliminate the rear yard setback requirement lot line where 15 feet is required in the M, Manufacturing District. Section 5. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. Section 6. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. PASSED this__ day of April, 2019 Alderman J. Beifuss a Alderman L. Chassee ee Alderman J. Sheahan a Alderman H. Brown = Alderman A. Hallett _ Alderman M. Ferguson _ Alderman M. Birch-Ferguson_—__ Alderman S. Dimas ee Alderman C. Swiatek _ Alderman M. Garling ey Alderman R. Stout _ Alderman J. Short _ Alderman N. Ligino-Kubinski_ Alderman B. Gagliardi _ Ordinance 19-O-0012 Page 2 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 44 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] APPROVED as to form: City Attorney ADOPTED this day of April, 2019. Ruben Pineda, Mayor ATTEST: Nancy M. Smith, City Clerk PUBLISHED: Ordinance 19-O-0012 Page 3 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 45 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “A” Subject Realty Legal Description Tax ID Number: 04-08-103-009 That part of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 39 North, Range 9, East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: beginning at a point on the south line of said southwest quarter of the northwest quarter 200 feet west of the northeast quarter corner of the west 60 acres of the southwest quarter of said Section 8; said point of beginning being the southwest corner of the schoolhouse lot conveyed by George McCauley and wife to School Trustees by deed recorded April 13, 1857 in Bool 20 of Deeds, Page 430, as Document 11308, thence running north 92 feet to the south line of the highway; thence north 73 degrees 20 minutes west along the south line of said highway 441.7 feet to the east line of the highway running southerly; thence south 22 degrees 54 minutes west along the east line of the highway 208 feet to the south line of said southwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence east to the point of beginning; (except therefrom land conveyed to Trustees of Schools, District 27 by quit claim deed recorded May 14, 1921 as Document 148351 and excepting therefrom the westerly 185 feet as measured along the south line of Roosevelt Road and the south line of said southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 8) in DuPage County, Illinois. Ordinance 19-O-0012 Page 4 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 46 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “B” RECOMMENDATION NO. 2019-RC-008 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: PC 18-22 Special Use Permits and Variances CMI Auto Repair 1850 Roosevelt Road DATE: April 2, 2019 DECISION: The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously (5-0 vote) recommended approval of four (4) special use permits to allow internet based motor vehicle sales, motor vehicle care center, motor vehicle repair shop, and outside storage ancillary to the special uses and variances to the pavement setbacks in the front, side, and rear yards. RECOMMENDATION: After holding a public hearing and after review of the requested special use permits and variances, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the special use permits according to the following findings of fact: (1) Is necessary for the public convenience at that location or, the case of existing noncon- forming uses, a special use permit will make the use more compatible with its surroundings: (This standard should be interpreted as indicating whether or not the proposed use is good for the public at that particular physical location, and not whether the use itself is needed there) The proposed motor vehicle related uses are best suited for an industrial area such as the subject property. The subject property is located within one of the City’s primary commercial corridors and is compatible with the existing commercial and industrial uses that surround it. (2) Is so designed, located and proposed to be operated that the public health, safety and welfare will be protected: The proposed use of the subject property should not adversely impact the public health, safety and welfare of the community. It is consistent with the former use of the property with relatively minor modifications proposed to the site. Improvements will be made to the site including paving all storage areas with a hard surface and enhancing the existing fencing for the storage areas with slats. Ordinance 19-O-0012 Page 5 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 47 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] (3) Will not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located: The proposed motor vehicle related uses should not cause substantial injury to the value of other property in the neighborhood in which it is located because the proposed use is best suited for a commercial or industrial area and the subject property is located within one of the City’s primary commercial corridors and is compatible with the existing commercial and industrial uses that surround it including the auto repair facility to the west and the landscape contractor’s yard to the south. (4) The proposed special use is designated by this code as a listed special use in the zoning district in which the property in question is located: The proposed internet based motor vehicle sales use is listed as a special use per Section 11.2-4 (DD) of the Zoning Code. The proposed motor vehicle care center use is listed as a special use per Section 11.2-4 (GG) of the Zoning Code. The proposed motor vehicle repair shop use is listed as a special use per Section 11.2-4 (C) of the Zoning Code. The outside storage area is ancillary to the proposed special uses and is a special use per Section 11.4-2(T) of the Zoning Code. Furthermore, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the variances according to the following findings of fact: (1) The particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved would result in a particular hardship upon the owner, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience or loss of revenue, if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out: The subject property is unique in that the site was developed under previous requirements that are no longer in effect and bringing the site into compliance with the City’s current standards would severely limit the functionality of the site given the location of the existing building and the existing curb cuts. (2) The condition upon which the requested variances are based would not be applicable, gener- ally, to other property within the same zoning classification: The requested variances are being supported because of the unique layout of the site. Many elements of the site are legal non-conforming and bring the site into compliance with the City’s current standards would severely limit the functionality of the site. (3) The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property: The applicant is not the original developer of the site and is not responsible for the site’s many legal non-conformities. Ordinance 19-O-0012 Page 6 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 48 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] (4) The granting of the variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located: Granting the requested variances should not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the area because the subject property’s site layout and surrounding sites are existing commercial/industrial uses that are compatible with the proposed use and additional landscape screening is not deemed necessary. (5) The proposed variances will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent prop- erty, substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood: The proposed variances should not substantially impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. (6) The proposed variances comply with the spirit and intent of the restrictions imposed by this Code: Bringing the site into compliance with the City’s current standards would severely limit the functionality of the site given the location of the existing building and the existing curb cuts. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the special use permits subject to the following conditions of approval: Ik The subject property shall be used in substantial conformance with the Plat of Survey prepared by Steinbrecher Land Surveyors, Inc. dated July 12, 2018, including the hand drawn parking layout improvements and septic field location. All vehicles to be sold or repaired, or that are in the process of being sold or repaired, shall be parked and stored inside the fenced storage area. All business related vehicles (i.e. tow trucks, vehicle transports, etc.) shall be parked within the fenced storage area. All employee parking shall be located within the fenced storage area. Slats shall be added to the existing chain-link fence to decrease the visibility of the storage area. No vehicles shall be parked within the Roosevelt Road right-of-way. All gravel surfaces shall be removed or paved prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. The existing building on the eastern portion of the property shall be used only for storage of items related to the approved special uses on the property. No storage from any offsite Ordinance 19-O-0012 Page 7 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 49 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] uses may occur within the building. Respectfully submitted, Steve Hale Acting Chairman VOTE: For Against Abstain Absent Devitt Dettman Hale Laimin Kasprak Faught Henkin Ordinance 19-O0-0012 Page 8 of 8 ===== PDF PAGE 50 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Scale N — oe eo my “ SOUTH LINE. ed PLAT OF SURVEY hE THIRD PRI iL JAR“ER 208 EXHIBIT "B" RA QUART SECTION 8. TOwNSHIP 39 SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOuTti RES OF THE SOUTHA QUARTER OF SAID TION 8, LUT CONVEYED BY GEORGE McMAULEY ST. ANO WIFE TO So? QEED RECORDED APRIL 13. 1857 IN BOOK 2@ OF DEEDS, PAGE 432 AS DOCUSENT 11388, RUN! THENCE NORTH 92 FEET THE HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 73 CEGREES 28 MINUTES WEST ALONG THE SOUT? LINE OF SAID HIGHWAY 441.7 FEET 10 THE HIGHWAY. RUNNING SOUTHERLY: THENCE SCUTH 22 DEGREES 54 MINJTES WEST ALONG THE EAST L INE OF THE HIGHWAY 288 FEE LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST SJARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER: TPENCE EAST [0 HE POINT CF BEGINNING. [EXCEPT THEREFROM CONVEYED TO TRUSTEES OF SCHOOLS. DISTRICT 2%, Sy GUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED MAY 14. 1921 AS DOCU 146351 AND EXCEPTING THEREFRON THE WESTERLY 185.2 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTH LINE GF ROOSEVELT ROAD AND THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHNEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8) IN DU PAGE TOUNTY, ILLINOIS BEGINNING AT A POINT OV TER CORNER OF THE WEST 6B ITHWEST CORNER GF THE SCHOOL. HOUSE Thin property 1s known ae 1858 Roosevelt Rosd. West Chitego, It linoie. Prepared for Anis Ghen-eala BRUSS ASSESSVENT PLAT (R2T-193429) PARCEL 2 5 \ Mos 13.58 \ (CONVEYED TO PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH) \ ROINT OF BEGINNING (4 POINT ON SOUTH LINE ; OF NW. 1/4, 200.2 FT. GEST OF N.E. CORNER OF USST £0 ACRES) COUNTY £ 9UP a Richard J. Steinbrecher Sonal Land Survey. sose expres N ===== PDF PAGE 51 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] qe re ed - \ EX! ST.OHD Ww! &S> tI TEL | | , all Be! ale ne: . , JO) pers | | | | | : | fel ws | | oh OF habs " Sex Pen 7 SSS | S| Pr Pray =» Nik i ‘cl Heh j | | WOE] aht3 | | Mile . { 1 ! i Lf : . ios tale | \/ ie | x \ EXIST. ME STL .AM — {| ‘ f te (0-6 i Nf ¢ en po oe iT} DF: r % \a : hme ; —————H ikea | | | L,. a NEW CONC. FILED Co, €—— KO _ eal |: ” ‘| EXIST, TOILET | PS ewetpiaring WI CONC. FTG - | N | = “oO. | UNIT SBGVE | fi 2) \ \ _ | ae o i ‘ |; —@ | | | % 0 | | “a. Ee | Lo 9) | } =| i] | & z | a | | |) exis | ): 5 5 | | || Skee) | | EXIST.SHOP AgEA’ S ple | “ia! to! || eet | (| (NO-CHANGE? PoP o> | rr ns | 1S | | | REFINISH FLoog) or zx a (Se ee | Bo) Big | EVIST. OFID. | —— =o | AAG il W[CINTEL — - | " so) sera al | t i:| aC of EFT UF E Shy | | ea | +4 : ; EXIST. OFFICE CNG CHANGE ; fo -- EXIST. | . =F | ; Mone my (i) ELECT. PANEL ; E—# i ; ; | —_— a == 2 Cola —— ” = ae 1 ; | ee, a J feo ay P| : ; pot —-| Le =m al | a re TR = * ' t - = EYIST. OFFICE -, . | (AREA (No CHINGE] an » | ' = an | Bd es ot EXIST. CONC. PARKING | Ht. | E DRIVEWAY” eee | | | E a 9 EMIST. | | | cs a OERICE age om Oe _ : [} CHO CHANGE ~Y , ; — | D A | A _ m . 1° S EXIST. sar Ss Ad | \ EXIST. => oN NuUGT eal << i | EXIST. | Fuew.!| MO: | | a | . | c? | | : | \ | | ; ’ EXIST. OH Dock | mad | kK ELECTRIC . epee | ‘ METEN | co ry -_ a : a i | ai _ } 4 de ee ee Oe eee 8 ee ee . | 48-0" EMIST. AG TE ». IS5OW. DOOGEVE!TOmRer Tar FLOOR PLAN 4- (S50. ROOSEVELT ROOSELT RD. ae L ZAAN) ¢NO CHANGE) WE PR = flies: 6 CC ———— ae WEST CHICAG,. ILI INOIS . | ===== PDF PAGE 52 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM TITLE: AGENDAITEMNUMBER: — “t-& Variance Requests for the Development of Land at 555 Innovation Drive, DuPage Business Center, on behalf of Scannell Properties FILE NUMBER: COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: Apr. 8, 2019 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: SIGNATURE La——>— APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE Ordinance No. 19-O-0013 STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP ITEM SUMMARY: Scannell Properties, d/b/a Scannell Properties #371 LLC, requests approval of two variances to allow construction of a speculative cross-docked distribution center, along with related site improvements, at 555 Innovation Drive in the DuPage Business Center. The warehouse will be 250,000 square feet and oriented to provide up to 54 total loading docks on the Roosevelt Road and the Innovation Drive sides of the building. See the attached site plan. The variances, if granted, would allow loading areas between the building and Innovation Drive and loading areas between the building and Roosevelt Road (per Section 10.5-4(B)(1). The variances would also allow loading areas to be located closer to Innovation Drive and Roosevelt Road than the respective south and north facades of the building. There are several conditions associated with development: 1. The height of the proposed berm along the north lot shall be increased to be no less than 15 feet above the elevation of Roosevelt Road adjacent to the property. 2. No trucks and trailers shall be parked or stored overnight anywhere in front of the building other than trailers docked to the building. 3. Overnight parking of trucks and trailers shall occur only in the designated truck parking stalls in the rear of the building. 4. A landscape inspection by City staff shall occur on the property within seven (7) days of com- pleted installation. If, in the opinion of City staff, the installed landscaping does not fully screen the docks and truck and trailer parking area along Roosevelt Road then the petitioner shall in- stall additional landscaping subject to approval by City staff. 5. If it is determined by staff that the parapet wall does not adequately screen rooftop mechanical units then individual screening shall be installed around the visible unit(s) to prevent view from Roosevelt Road. The property is zoned A, Airport and is subject to both City and DuPage Airport Authority rules and regulations. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals’ recommendation is included as Exhibit “B” of the at- ===== PDF PAGE 53 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] tached ordinance. Commissioners voted 5-0 in favor of recommending to allow both variances. ACTION PROPOSED: Consideration of two variances for the development of land at 555 Innovation Drive. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance Plan Commission/ZBA Recommendation (attached as Exhibit “B” to the Ordinance) Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape and Berm Plans ===== PDF PAGE 54 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] ORDINANCE NO. 19-0-0013 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING CERTAIN VARIANCES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND AT 555 INNOVATION DRIVE SCANNELL PROPERTIES #371, LLC. WHEREAS, on January 24, 2018, Scannell Properties #371, LLC. (the “APPLICANT”), filed an application for certain land use variances for the vacant property located at 555 Innovation Drive and legally described on Exhibit “A”, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as the “SUBJECT REALTY”; and, WHEREAS, Notice. of Public Hearing on said application was published in the Daily Herald on March 18, 2019, all as required by the ordinances of the City of West Chicago and the statutes of the State of Illinois; and, WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Chicago, commencing on April 2, 2018, pursuant to said Notice; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT provided testimony in support of their application, and all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and, WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago have received the recommendation of the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals for the variances which contains specific findings of fact, pursuant to Recommendation No. 2019-RC-0009, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” which is, by this reference, incorporated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West Chicago, DuPage County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows: Section 1. The following variances in conformance with Section 10.5-10 of the Zoning Ordinance are hereby granted for the SUBJECT REALTY, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. Allowing loading and servicing between the building and the public streets on the north and south sides of the subject property per Section 10.5-4(B)(1) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Allowing loading spaces to be closer to a public street than the building fagade facing said public street on the north and south sides of the subject property per Sections 10.5-4(B)(2) and 10.5-8(C)(1) of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 2. The variances listed in Section 1 are subject to substantial compliance with the Site Plan pre- pared by Spaceco Inc. dated January 18, 2019, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “C”. Section 3. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, shall, to the extent not expressly modified by the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, remain in full force and effect as therein provided. Section 4. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. Ordinance 18-O-0013 Page | of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 55 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] PASSED this day of 2019. Alderman J. Beifuss ee Alderman L. Chassee Alderman J. Sheahan — Alderman H. Brown Alderman A. Hallett ee Alderman Ferguson Alderman Birch Ferguson | Alderman S. Dimas Alderman K. Meissner ee Alderman M. Garling Alderman R. Stout ee Alderman G. Garcia Alderman N. Ligino-Kubinski_ Alderman B. Gagliardi APPROVED as to form: Patrick K. Bond, City Attorney APPROVED this day of 2019. Mayor Ruben Pineda ATTEST: City Clerk Nancy M. Smith PUBLISHED: Ordinance 18-0-0013 Page 2 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 56 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “A” THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, PER MONUMENT RECORD R2003-137779; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID QUARTER SECTION (BEARING BASED ON THE ILLINOIS STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM EAST ZONE NAD-83) 410.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 906.76 FEET TO THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PER QUIT CLAIM DEEDS RECORDED NOVEMBER 21, 2012 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER R2012-165678; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY, 400.65 FEET, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 38 (AKA ROOSEVELT ROAD) FOR THIS AND THE NEXT (4) COURSES; (1) THENCE NORTH 84 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST 310.43 FEET; (2) THENCE NORTH 05 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST 50.00 FEET; (3) THENCE NORTH 84 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST 914.20 FEET; (4) THENCE SOUTH 81 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 221.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 3 IN DUPAGE NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PARK NORTH ASSESSMENT PLAT LOT 3, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 19, 2007 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER R2007-184625; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 881.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN DUPAGE NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY PARK NORTH ASSESSMENT PLAT LOT 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JULY 10, 2007 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER R2007- 127454; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2 A DISTANCE OF 185.89 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 21 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 177.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF INNOVATION DRIVE DEDICATED PER DOCUMENT R2007-131936; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID INNOVATION DRIVE FOR THE NEXT (3) COURSES; (1) THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 16.66 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CIRCLE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 750.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 62 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST 16.66 FEET TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; (2) THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 77.98 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CIRCLE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 964.92 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 59 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST 77.95 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; (3) THENCE WESTERLY 799.96 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CIRCLE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 495.08 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS SOUTH 76 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST 715.73 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 52 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 55 SECONDS WEST 291.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 568.72 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS. CONTAINING 39.441 ACRES OR 1,718,048 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. P.I.N: 04-07-102-016 Ordinance 18-0-0013 Page 3 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 57 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “B” RECOMMENDATION NO. 2019-RC-0009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: PC 19-06 Variances Scannell Properties #371, LLC 555 Innovation Drive DATE: April 2, 2019 DECISION: The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously (5-0 vote) recommended approval of variances to accommodate the construction of a 250,000 square foot speculative warehouse facility at 555 Innovation Drive to allow the proposed loading areas of the warehouse to face the public rights-of-way of Roosevelt Road and Innovation Drive. RECOMMENDATION: After holding a public hearing and after review of the requested variances, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the variances according to the following findings of fact: (1) The physical condition of the premises is unique and does not apply to neighboring premises in the same district. The subject property is unique in that it is bound by public streets to the north and the south. This feature is only applicable to a small number of parcels within the DuPage Business Center. Furthermore, although the property has no direct frontage along Technology Boulevard to the east, the property is separated from the right-of-way only by a narrow out lot. (2) The aforesaid unique conditions are not the result of actions taken after the adoption of the Zoning Code or relevant amendment thereof by any person personally having an interest in the property: The aforementioned unique conditions are a result of the overall existing roadway layout of the DuPage Business Center and was not designed nor constructed by the petitioner. (3) Strict application of the regulations of the airport zoning district would deprive the owner of the reasona- ble use of his premises equivalent to the use of neighboring premises within the district: The petitioner has indicated that rotating the building to comply with the strict letter of the Code would not be feasible in that it would hinder the layout for a financially viable project. (4) Granting of the variance will be in harmony with the intent of the Zoning Code and will not be detrimental to any neighboring premises: Granting the requested variances will be in harmony with the intent of the Zoning Code and will not be detrimental provided that adequate landscaping is provided as proposed along Innovation Drive and that the proposed berm along Roosevelt Road is increased in height to provide an effective screen along Roo- Ordinance 18-0-0013 Page 4 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 58 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] sevelt Road. These landscape buffers will mitigate any impacts by providing an adequate visual screen from the docks and truck and trailer parking areas. The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the special use permit subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. No trucks and trailers shall be parked or stored overnight anywhere in front of the building other than trailers docked to the building. 2, Overnight parking of trucks and trailers shall occur only in the designated truck parking stalls in the rear of the building. 3. A landscape inspection by City staff shall occur on the property within seven (7) days of completed installation. If, in the opinion of City staff, the installed landscaping does not fully screen the docks and truck and trailer parking area along Roosevelt Road then the petitioner shall install additional landscap- ing subject to approval by City staff. 4. If it is determined by staff that the parapet wall does not adequately screen rooftop mechanical units then individual screening shall be installed around the visible unit(s) to prevent view from Roosevelt Road. Respectfully submitted, Steve Hale Acting Chairman VOTE: For Against Abstain Absent Devitt Dettman Hale Laimins Kasprak Faught Henkin Ordinance 18-0-0013 Page 5 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 59 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT “C” (Insert the Site Plan here) Ordinance 18-0-0013 Page 6 of 6 ===== PDF PAGE 60 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] a y | / “ / Z ' ' | 7 ( LY rt Pi} / | | va i}, f dy 1 | P ne: 4 | 1 Io4 \ 7 // J aj; | 1 4 \ 7 /f, = 7 fp / | 3 i \ /// /, pos - 7 J A 1 1 t a 7 / f / ‘ a | ’ row 7 7 y, / § 1’ “Bs “ <— / ny WA / 4 i ~ 7 / : é | iN ae SN 2 ff; Lf ff | +- ~~~ oad >< "Se ~S 7 // ae, / fr ; fou ee io A Pie _ * ad St ff is, J, t SS = ‘% . { ef y f Ali ae Sh —_ | BIS £: ’ = S 5 i, = SS Si < Z tPA | YY, ; fe “) _ pe Tae ) A | | 7 LD, BY LE i ee =“ WANN — _~ aw AS, : fo. OS oh / en te ‘\ — a Sg 7 —— ~~. AY . f ” RY a == i / SN ee SQ. “7 YF pe Hi i ~— ==. SN on ~~ wg A. A \y _-__ aa | “SS om SO = és S SS u “ jt > SSeS PRON KN GIN ™ ee AOA ZL \ | i i ~~ TN NO * SS oe SE ™~~—~> ~ —_— a AO ) yo it a NSS ee ZO — a a Lae ASK \ | 3 to Na iS SUL KES SSS A LEEGE ; fy rot += JS SS S83 es OEE. \ ! ! 1 Sk Sw ~ _ ST) —. so ; , Soon er \ 1 1 ™~S , Vi ~s\ aN SS ~ oR rN ~ Be _ 4 ae \ | ' 1 ot “~> QS PS} —— ee a eee ee _—— 26 “? = 407 \ » 4 { JP ON ~ == Bg meee a eae ~z- \ , | i Mrs JS SL Ory RE, aA NOMWAONN aE eet ge ag * | ' i | ! ee y yee - 7 << of. KY So 5 a eT a “- ae €S \ | ' i ‘SS Q Lx “oN f ees, > S ~ — EE = a ie ae — : = - ~ mg 1 i 1 Sy Sr Oe 23. SSS een = _ Jp -FS ¢ o® ee ame = | | 1 f~2 J SN ~ pn Sed Be Bae —— o_ | od | \f “ / ~>™__ Te — ee e on- b j 1 [SBS any, Oe ge a “a— é. 25 | || Pity Ly / ay, resets eee a 1 | Poof z ’ ) / FP y | | | = — o 4 lie f fp 2 = - iy ko ee “at f \ am f d _o4 i \ — . y 11 i 3 ! sinensis se inoals Wenn / \ | i= | | feb thr \ 4 \ | pfroro | J XA ‘ l | i i i | Ne ' | ' ' ' = | Pibah ? -— ' | ' 1 ' | 4 _ - : \ | t | ' 1 t “ , AO aA ss ) a {ida —“— &§ EM , ~ | | par rly J | ' _ D pin o— j ye ily 5 x) ! 7 ge C) ' pion fp K\\ , J td ona _| ; ot re f e 25 er | ' | ' A f 3 ~~ = oe] Bl | 1 | 1 103.7! ) / os hd | 9g i | ; 4 | | \\AZ A : Li | 5 iH 7 | Hin [> CY | | | Eat i =| ‘ | = | = | | =e | | ce tee Ge Boe ele a —| | ' | it | | | | | | 4 | i | } i 1 O + ll ! | i ' ' y : ns | aa seated | | | aaa | | | | ie L-+|_) ( 7 | woo becnene | — — 44 | | SWE pecactalte tate Somat | | a iT | a peoebe so ieretorc a | lef wf — | 1 1 i | | I Sarno ane + hse | t i { 4 of [ere pene t i] 1 | 1 t 1 | l RBI T Ze a { | | - 3 | 1 ' | toy ' ! Ey | | | 625! | | Ee] } fit | . | EAM ees 25 PHL |B a eer emeee ee JERS H f) | 1 1 i) } 0.4 power J sDe erect a Sad bs 3 = | 2 1 i! yet ih | (is Se la rH tne ee re = | ieee eer ere = i}: | 3 fg} “8 | | | i: ay | — a | a Boece | a } : ee ee ee ' 1 | | | 3 ate glee Hee ay ae | | Ly) Ci] | 3 tet A =u Rh: | Pa PA eT | 1 | foo pron | | | _—— bee a | 1 i | S72" NAGI Se ea ~ | | tot ot | | | (11), BAYS AT a ener ae | | | | | j U | ' ' ' 5! Ales Ty (fein pega TST Sad PRBUS ET | | | ay | | fyi ft of | | | || | caesarean — eee | Reel te 4A |} ; fi ty = 4 | | +--+ A — | | 6 | fib | | | | | | | H Pf | Tp a tel bE. ht Port] | Z| | | | : By. ce a w | t ||: j t | § | | x - =f = } PE TEE EL Zin 7 | ~y SSE J, | t i ee ' | | o yy fs 5 >, J 1 3 or | I ae Ba. z = ! | jt rN 8 Qe~ 15 CT ' | i t \ ax > ; | fir | | | \ a5 | ' i} do ' ‘ i e ff | | | = I “© ao 3 feb uy | bot | 3 |! _ foi | Be : 33 ' ' 3s | [yi ft 3a aes SEaRHe | | | : | | | z =e z PTT TTT | t i t " m COLL | ' Pdr ' | | | PPT errr | i ; frou ! CET ha ptt ttt ifPt | Sm see | | at Perr rrr rrr TIE Ie ' 1 | EEL | LUT CO pT TTT — i | Lt 06.1" ae - 1 | ----4 ~ ———— a } oe 4 ogee ——— — ih — | a ' e--- _ a eee . al ! ---- aoe _— i | shee ie —— —= ' | errr a 8 ——— EE 1 | uence oo be nl | Tee ee __—-—— ' { —— —— 1 { Y 1 T ee a \f \ a pe ne ° BE E4IB] © ee < Pt “| r ASS = —— ———— dq es $3 zi ee See ee 2 8 8 oa Teen ELT ~ zee pa Beds BR 22998 15 Eid i E TE pee TE 2 one 2B Ree a 43 sae 36 BIE] a —Nn— bP eee a 6 Ekg Se Bus B 88 stand So 8:15) sie. : ' OS ie Oe ‘aly 3s RY Be adds 56 no ‘ ae | re ll et Le SEER) ' ' ' ae Tee f oid wi oo te oy Be ~~ a ae “719 33a 73 & =B SR gis oh Re 3 ie ae Pm i °5 g 2 a a 3 ae 3 : ' ay 5 i £ 8 am ne a teens ; ' ' = I 1 W ! ! [ : 3 ae / = | ee SS 1 : OVERALL SITE PLAN Tae eae ee — iS Can ances | COVERALL SITE PLAN j2fosrsrig[PER DAA Pp sl fesl fez LL Nol pate [Rewanks Cd -_ Alias Ba Be en UPAGE BUSINESS CENTER - SCANNE ——————EE 9 wu. | 5 ba oo Ep 9575 W. Higgins sate Seeecate — D WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS r t, Mine 2 — 2 Phone: (847) eadnes tee toert 696-4055 ===== PDF PAGE 61 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] WALL SURFACE AREA = 72,738 ALUMINUM FRAME AND its GLASS/STOREFRONT AREA= 3,32 LASS WINDOWS — GLASS/STOREFRONT= 4.57 EAST ELEVATION — . a z 5 z ee 7] a Sistas i362 6 (6 SE2e By RS RESe| 2 Be ee | exe fara 625-0" SCALE: 1 allalis BlSs | ie i WEST ELEVATION aaa | [BS Bo BS os BSc Be pS Bees Be, Bee eel SOUTH ELEVATION fod — & fa i i nh il a fy Af . PaulWoodyARCHITECT ff Scannell Development poorest SCANNELL Proposed Facility 1 Be NaMonaos PROPERTIES ===== PDF PAGE 62 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] = Blended Seed Mix Wel Mesic Prairie Grass Mix (Short Grass Prairie Seed Mx + Wet Mesic Prairie Grass Mix) Wet Mesic Proirie Gross Mix ‘Short Gross Proirie Seed Mix Botonical Nome Common Nome Ube face Botonicat Nome Common Nome Or/rce Toto! tbs. /Acre restis. conodensis 0155 Corex bebbit Corex ennectena xonthocerpa Yelow 0.0315 ttle Bivestem ‘Se Oats Groma 28 120 Coren bicknelii Bickned’s Gebb's Sedge 2.0625 Bymua canodensis Bovisoos caripendule Conoda Wad Rye 12 Corex molesta Field Ovo! 0.125 Corex normotia Normal Sedge 0.0315 Toto! Grosses: 160 10 Corex scoporio Corex wulpincideo Fox 0.125 DuPage Business Center Forbs Conodion Wid Rye Botenicel Nome Common Neme O2/hcre Virginia Wid Rye 1.000 Scannell Totol tbs. /Acre Gyceria striata Wonne Gross Aaclepiaa tuberosa Butlerfy Milcweed shuncus spp. Ruth Species Rice Cut Gross 125 0015S Ooles purpurea Coreopsis palmate Leersio oryzoides ‘Switch Gress 125 Echinecea pallida Purple Proirie Clover Pole Purple Coneflower Poa palvatris Morsh Blue Gross Echinecea purpureo Ultie Buestem 1,000 West Chicago, lincis Fongiove Beord Tongue ‘Scirpus otrovirens Sporobolus heterclepis Dork Green Rush 0.125 Rudbeciéo hirta Proirie Oropseed Trodescontia obiensis Block-Eyed Suson 45 15 Toto 5.0815 here Permonent Wotriz 5.0815 Lbs-/Acre ‘No Wow Seed Total Forbs: 25 No Mow Seed, “ Cover with NAG S7SEN Erosion Control Blanket (biodegredable). Tote! Grosses ond Fords: 125 Wildflower Seed Nix Temporory Cover Crop == Sea Not Botanical Nome Common Nome Ox fhcre Totol tbs. /Acre Avena sativa No Mow Seed Mix Cornman Cots 160 10 am Applied ot the rote of 25 Ibs. per ocre. Longfelow Chenings Fescue 23.60% —— Choriot Hord Fescue 23.06% 11.84% ‘Shoreline Slender ing Red Fescue 1190x 2 — Wo Wow Seed Wet Mesic Proicie Gross Mix Novigotor Creeping Red Fescue 12385 : 7 Botonical Nome Common Nome Lbs /here Heron Hord Fescue 11.76x Oe conodensis Blue Joint Gross a.oiss Gull Annual Ryegross 399% —# Corex onnectens xonthocorpa: Yelow 0.0315 No Moe Lown Mix with Annual Rye Nurse Crop = rrES Corex bebbit Bebd's 0.300 Proirie Nursery, Inc. Corex molesta Corex bicknelit Gicknel's 0.0625 DAVID R. McCALLUM ASSOCIATES, INC. Corex normals Normal Sedge Field Oval Sedge 0.125 0.0315 Aeplied at the rote of 5 fs. per 1,000 squore feet. Cover with North Americen Green S075. 5 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Corex scoporia 0.250 Cores vulpincidea Fox Sedge 0125 ‘Seeding sholl occur weather permitting, prior to Woy 15 or after September 15, but prior to October 15. {520 Artaias Paton 41495 | Uber, lircis 60048 Bymus canodensis Conodion Wid Rye 0.500 ‘Cleon topsel sholl be required beneath oll no mow seeded orecs ot @ minimum depth of 6 inches. T emo Gyceria stricta Dyrus viginicus Wiginia Wald Rye Wonne Gross 0.500 4.000 3. Juncus Epp. o.o1ss =—=- =. Leersio oryroides Rice Cut Gross O25 Panicum wirgatumn Seitch Grass 0.125 we y aR MK Poo polustria Schizechyrium scoporium Uttle Bluestem Morsh Bive Gress 0.500 1.000 Notes ‘Scirpus otrovirens Dork Green Rush 0.250 Mi sodded lown crecs sholl be inigcted with @ fully oulomatic londscope iigation system. ‘Sporobolus heterolepis Proirie Dropseed 0128 Totol ‘Sed Blend: HO2000 Kentucky Bivegross or opproved equal. Permenent Wotrix 5.0815 Los. /Acre Widflower Seed Mix: 5.0815 Lbs /acre Overseed Na Mow Seed Mix where indicated on draw with: 25% Aster novoe—angloe Aster Cover with NAG S7SEN Erosion Control Blonket (biodegrodeble). 25% Echinocea purpurea i 25% Leuconthemum x 25% Sofidega rugose / Aoply at the rote of 1/4 pound /ocre. 7 Shesta Doisy ASSOCIATES Gleon topsod sholl be required beneoth of sodded orecs ct a minimum depth of 6 inches. S ‘AM sodéed oreos sholl be irrigated with @ fully oulomatic irrigation system — see specification. (17) 12" BC (3) 12° Poo (6) 12" PSY L(4) ys oD (10) 12" PIA (8) 12 Poo (4) 3° ceo (3) 12" PC (4) 12° Pco (5) 12° PU (2) 3° AF (3) 3° ACF The londscope controcior shell mointein oll londscope creas until estoblishment ond occeptonce. (9) 17" Pw (2) 3° Qu 7) 12° Poo. =a Lendecape Calcuations | Yard Requirements “ Parkway t) oe -@ -@-— e- 13 thode tees ~ innovation Drive (723°) 11 = 4 new + 7 existing shode trees (6) #1 Hus: (1) 3° Que (1) 3° que (6) g1 HUG (6) #1 SCH Porking Areos (6) #1 SCH = V 3 W Ze Londscope ores (200 spoces) Heo. tt 4848 aq. ft. Front_+ Exterior Side Yords ~ope eso Proposed Percent ij ‘South - 723° 12 thode trees 40 203 21 ev. ond/or om. trees ‘shrubs o ‘73 evergreen tees ‘shrubs 521 smoll shrubs 0 smoll shrubs 4° wide commerciel tree wep (2) Umea rect bel Gometer. secured wth sisal twine. Reor_+ Side Yords (2) 3° que: Set root bal 2°- Remove wire bosket from lop North ~ 97.01" 8 chose tees 33 shode Wrees 26 ¢ ¢ cbove finished grode. © of root bel. 28 ev. ond/or om. trees 93 ev. trees rs 3 4° Gapin wrested: 196 large shrubs 0 lorge shrubs ° ° herbeced mich. TS percent essing sod 23 percent mushroom compost hy Keep 6 inches from trun (F root fore. Eost - 1264.34" 13 shode trees 13 shode trees " 26 tx a ta 249 lorge shrubs 36 ev. ond/or om. trees 36 evergreen Lees. smol! shrubs 114 perenniola = 38 small shrubs Sod ‘Sod ee ra (1) 3° GTS ‘Sealy sides of plonting pr = 1016.54" 11 shode trees © shode trees aa Oe a gered oF aed. 22 ev. ond/or om. trees 0 ev. ond/or om. trees b (7) 24° ROU ‘Plece root bol an stable 204 large shrubs 0 lorge shrubs —~ (6) 24° Compect exceveled sol cround rest Fire Hydrant ball bese lo stebitre. Detention + Retention Areas — N/A ‘Sod, (10) 24” Bux Foundation Deciduous Tree Planing Lendscope ores ian 10" with Minium 10° width (11) 24° Right~ol—Wey Wesions — N/A a 3 ~~ Ground Signa (4) 24° 0 Main Pork HE jenont sign =e ‘Sx 4) x 10) 120" ta. ft. tndscope ovee 60 sq. fl. londacope oreo 304 8g. Ni. londscope area 282 2g. f. londscope erea 8 Frenting pt Gameter 4" apt shredded: = (2) times root bell bell Gometer RU No Wow Seed (1) 9° Keep 6 Inches from trek pardecod masch. = a ‘Sel real boll 2° ebovs finihed grede. — ‘oF reot fare, ——a Qs (14) 41 SPO ae Landecape Calculations | Landscape Areas A ; Landscape Plan Remove wire beskat trom lop Sits Colculotions = = © of root bet. = = Totel Ste Ares: 920,858 squore feet Yer —_ a. 73 percent Totol Londscope Avec: 331,056 squore feet f 78 percent mushroom compost 324.830 feet x Total Groundieyer Area (Sod, No Mow ond Notive Grosses ond Forts): Na Wow Seed: 89,187 squore feet (1) 3° GTS Ll Undisturbed subgroda Native Grosses ond Forts: 216/313 squore feet 19/330 square feet x © (6) 1 HG a (13) 24" ‘gered oF dried. ‘Scary siden of plonting pk (6) #1 OK: e For Review Only ~_\ == i x Do Not Use For Construction ‘Pleca rect boll on stable Piant List bell bese to stebiize, Compect excoweied soll cround rect ‘Shode Trees Gotenical Nome Comman Nome (6) i nol 23 ry ‘Acer x {reemond ‘Autumn Bloze’ ‘Auturmn Bieze Freeman Mople 3 Celtis occidentalis Common Hockberry (1) 3 ots Evergreen Tree Planting 4 cs Geditsie trioconthos vor. inermis ‘Skyline’ ry 12 } y Quercus bicolor Gymnociodus Goicus "Espresso Espresso Kentucky Cofleetree (6) #1 CuK. 3 3 Quercus muehienbergi Chinkopin Ook Seomp White Ook - 16 - Quercus. mocrocorpa Bur Ook City Review Comments 327.9 4° depth stredded herdeoc¢— ‘Set rect boll 2° above (1) 3° co (14) 91 CuK mich over entire ploniing bed. feriahed rode. Evergreen Key” Qty. Trees Botenical Nome Common Nome City Review Comments 0327.19 Extend planting bed 6 (of 2" beyond root bol or oe shown on pion. 2 Fices gloucs ‘Densate Block Hila Spruce oa1a9 75 percent exieling sol 12 Picea gleuca ‘Densata’ Block Hila Spruce Remora top of bution. 23 percent madwoom compost 28 12 Picea abies Picea obies Norwoy Soruce DAA Review Comments ca nu Picea pungens sides of plonting pit a7 12 Picea pungens Coloredo Green Spruce DAA Review Comments fecteitc) © Ged, 16 Pinus sylvestris Scolch Pine f Undstubed subgrade " 17 Pious syhvestris Scotch Pine For Review oa (13) 247 CLE Qy. Botonical Nome Common Nome Pleca root bol on stable bel bese ta wlabitre. Compact excoveied sol eround rest 12 2° ‘Aronia melonocarpa Low Scope “UCI6S' Low Scope Mound Chokeberry 2° 24° Bums x Gethra cinifoba 2 Cornus sericea “Isonti* Isonti Redosier Hummingbird Summerswect No Mow Seed— 24° Forsythia viriGisima ‘Bronzensis’ Bronx Dwort Fe ‘Shrub Planting pots See Sheet LLO 2° 2° Incredibell Smooth Hydrangea " 2 niperua chinensis vor. sorgenti Rides olpinum ‘Green Mound’ See Sheet L30 102 246 hws crometice ‘Gro-Low’ 26 2" ‘Syringa Bloomerang Dork Purple “SMSJEF7" Gro-Low Fr Purple Loc T? depth mustevem compet: over entire perennial bed. Perennicis ond Omomentel Grosses Perenriol plont Key Qty. Size Botenical Nome Common Nome (14) gt SPO ‘Specing 08 noted 7 plon. (1) 3° co _ u CuK a2 101 ium ‘Summer a Feather Reed “@ Undaturbed mibgrede HUG A Hemerocollis “Uitte Gropette’ Colamogrostis ocutifiore ‘Kori Foerster’ Little Gropette Doyfly UA Kobold Blazing Stor Rook 12" apt planting mix PAN Ustria spicata “Kobold” Seitch Gross (6) g1 CuK ZS percent mustroom compost 73 percent dean lapect SCH RUD 3 ry Rodbecize fugide‘Coldaturm’ Lite Goldsturm Block-Eyed Suen 0 90 Sporobolus heterclepis =e) Pererral Planting L10 ===== PDF PAGE 63 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] — Blended Seed Mix Wet Mesic Prairie Grass Mix (Short Grass Prairie Seed Mx + Wet Mesic Prairie Grass Mix) Wet Mesic Proirte Gross Mix Short Gross Proirie Seed Mix Botonical Nome Common Nome Lbs /hcre Botenical Nome ‘Common Nome O2z/acre Totol tbs. /Acre Blue Joint Gross ais Corex bebbit Corex onnectens xonthocorpe Yeliow Sedge 0.0315 ==IL Little Bivestem 120 Cores bicknelti Bickned’s Bebb's Sedge 0.0825 Dymus conedensis Boutelous curtipendula Sde Oats Groma 28 12 Corex moleste Field Ovol Sedge 0.125 ~. ~-5 Conde Wid Rye Corex normoiia Normal Sedge 0.0315 Tote! Grosses: 160 10 Corex scoporia ~. DuPage Business Center Corex vulpinaidea Fox Sedge 125, == Forts Conodion Wild Rye 1,000 Tse Scannell Botonicel Nome Common Neme Ox,/Acre Total Iba. /Acre Gycerie striate Virginia Wid Rye enna Gross 0.500 ~< Tm, ‘Asclepios tuberosa Juncus spp. Rush Species 0.0155 (3) 37 Quy HTT Ta. Coreopsis polmate Leersio onyzoides Rice Cut Cross 0.125 == ~~ Dolee purpurea Purple Proirie Clover Ponicum virgotum ‘Switch Cross 0.125 — Te Echinocea palide Pote Purple Conefiower Poa polustria Worsh Bive Gress ~s =} TTT West Chicago, Hinds Echinocea purpurea Schizochyrium scoparium Uitte Biuestem Dork Green Rush 1,000 No Mow Seed Wildflower Seed Mix Penstemon digitola Obedient Piont Fomglove Beord Tongue Proivie Dropseed 0.125 Wildflower Seed Mix See Notes =e ‘See “Notes. Rudbeckéo hirta Physoategia wrginiona 15 — a Tredescentia obiensis Block-Eyed Suson 45 Totol 5.0815 here No Wow. Seed = ae Permonent Wotrix 5.0815 Lba-/Acre T= Totol Forts: 25 ee Cover with NAG S7SEN Erosion Control Blonket (biodegradebie). L~-4 niet Totel Grasses ond Forbs: 125 =o Temporory Cover Crop == > <2 Botonicel Nome Common Nome O2./here PRS AEE oe ot Toto! Iba /Acre No Mow Seed Mix paae S = $4 ani ‘Avena sotive Common Cots 160 10 faiter! 4 Longfellow Chesings Fescue 2.60% SET EE EES Aepled ot the rote of 25 Ibs. per ocre. = ae ra i ‘Choriot Hord Fescue 11B4x = ees —(1) 3° cr Wel Mesic Proirie Gross Mix ‘Shoreline Slender ing Red Fescue 12.38% 11.90% rr yay It a oS =p et Botonical Nome Common Nome Heron Hord Fescue Creeping Red Fescue 11.76% tbe acre Gull Annuol Ryegrass 99x 2 5 ‘ ie conodensis Blue Joint Gross 0.0155 rw “a f—No Mow Seed Corex onnectens xonthocorpa Yellow Sedge oo315 No Mow Lowa lia with Annual Rye Nurse Crop 72 sate 1 r Corer bicknelit Corex bebbii Bebb's Sedge 0.300 Prote Nursery, inc. AR t3 Corex molesta Gcknel's 0.125 0.0625 DAVID R. McCALLUM ASSOCIATES, INC, Corex normate Normal Sedge Fidd Oval Sedge 0.0315 ‘Aeplied ot the rate of 5 Iba. per 1,000 squore feet. Cover with North Americon Green SD75. NY cb LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Corex scoparia 0.250 Sea Corex wiipinoideo Fox Sedge 0.125, Seeding sholl occur weather permitting, prior to Moy 15 or after September 15, but prior to October 15. EDy us 820 Ariss Partensy 7496 | Ubertyie, fircis 60048 Dymus conodensis Conodion Wad Rye 0.500 Geon topso’ sholl be required beneath off no mow seeded orecs at a minimum depth of 6 inches. ate iY) Za T A720 Meginie Wid Rye 1.000 iS sant + 7 T —T (26) 247 RHG Proposed : Nj —Y South - 723° shode trees 40 21 ex. ond/or om. trees 75 trees f-——No Now Seed 1 203 521 emoll shrubs ‘shrubs o thrbs Wi er) I. 0 soll shrubs SO" Sod ‘secured witht siea! toine. 47 wide commerciel Lee erep Reor + Side Yords na > Aj +-— (48) 247 FYB (2) tomes rest bell Someter. Required 28 (x tom at ‘Sel root ball 2°. © of rock bef, Remove wire boshet from top = 977.01" 20 shode trees 3S shode trees 26 No Mow Seed KARR hove faished grede. Ma: 28 ev. ond/or om. trees 93 ev. trees 1% iN 4° Gaptn wrredded: 75 percent exiating sal 196 lorge shrubs 0 lerge shrubs (1) 3° Que OS +—(29) 24" cst Keep 6 inches from tri hordeoed match. 73 percent matroom compost Kost — 1264.34" 13 shode trees 13 shode trees 26 ( WY WY) 1 or rect flere, 36 ev. ond/or om. trees 38 evergreen trees ” Ho IN 3 IN Undisturbed sutqrode 243 lorge shrubs (\ Ne ee Re 1 smoll shrubs 114 perennicis = 38 smoll shrubs My Vee -—(1) 3° qua oat RY) 2 Scorty sides of planting ptt West — 1016.56" 31 shode tees 0 shode trees %_\ OD i gered or cried. 23 ev. ond/er om. trees © ev. ond/or om. trees (4) 247 Row. ote Proce root boll on stoble 204 lorge shruta © large shruba (15) 247 Em: (10) 24” Bux —(14) 91 PAN Compect exceveled sol ereund rest bell bose Lo siebire, Detention + Retention Areos — N/A Foundation 4 LY. Deciduous Tree Planting Londscope oreo ‘imam 10" width Minierum 10° width <3 Wildflower Seed Mix Right~ol-Way Wedions — N/A a 3 (11) 24° Hye (1) Sars. kb TT ‘See Notes A 0 ip A S fie) ~~ Ground Sgns v HE fi ae ite ats ae S mote (x 10) 24) 120° tq. fh. landscape oree 60 3q. ft. londscope oreo ‘252 9q. ft. londscope oreo 304 9g. ft. londscope erea ——¢ a +T (3) 3° 8 ep ss Ng 4° Gepin wedded: — (2) times root bell bef Gomeier. es herbesed musch. oe | mo ‘Set rect ball 2° ebove Minished rode. sr ‘No Mow Seed b Keep 6 Inches from trunk ef reel fore, a — =e (14) #1 SPO — [| Landecape Calculations | Landscape Areas Landscape Plan — —- Remove wire beskat trem lop ‘Ste _Colculations © of rock bel, (1) 3° ots — Totol Ste Area: 920,858 squore feet Undaturbed eubdgrede Native Grosses ond Forbs: 19,330 square feet (9 Q)- 9, Tort = —— (13) 24° sya itt @ tied. sides of plonting pt For Review Only ~ === Fire hydrant a al Do Not Use For Construction Poca rect boll on slate Plant List ball Bese to siebiize. ‘excoveted val oround rost ‘Shode Trees (6) #1 CuK Botanical Nome Common Nome 2B yr ‘Acer x freemoni ‘Autumn Blore’ Celtis occidentots Autumn Blate Freemon Wople 3 oD. Evergreen Tree Planting 4 Gleditsia trioconthos yor. inermis ‘Skyine’ Siyfine Thorless r=) u Gymnociodus Goicus "Espresso! Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree we) 12 > Quercus bicolor Swamp White Ook |___wiidilower Seed Wiz ‘See Notes 16 13 } y Quercus Bur Ook Chinkapin Ook Quercus mocrocorpa Cty Review Comments 0327.19 mich over entire planting bed. 4° depth whredded herdocod— ‘Sat rect boll 2° cbeve Evergreen Trees (14) #1 cu: fished grote. Botonical Nome Common Nome City Review Comments 0327.9 Gitond plonting bed of T beyond root bol or os thew on pion. a : Block Hills (1) cts: ay DAA review Comments ict) ‘TS percent exiting soll # 12 Picea obies Ficea giouca "Densote’ Block Hills Spruce Remove top of bates. 75 percent musivoem compost iz Ficea obies Norwoy Spruce DAA Review Comments aes un Picea pungens Colorodo Green Spruce Noreay Spruce 47 12 Pree pungens RE Coes (1) 3° Go DAA Review Comments [ictots) v4 Se geting pa 16 Pinus sylvestris ‘Scotch Pine " 12° Pious sylvestris Scotch Pine For Review o1a9 ta Botenical Nome (13) 24° [——Ne Mow Seed a ESEEEEE ‘Placa root bell on stable ay. ‘Common Nome ‘No Mow Seed 2 er eas ro Compect exceveled soll eround rect 12 2a Low Scope Mound Chokeberry ball bese Je stebitze. co fone neareene lee Seer cre Pade 24° Sete into rnin Hummingbird Summersweet +—(4) 3° auc a lnonti Redosier i -f a“ 2° Formythia wridssima "Bronrensis” Bronx Dwort Forsythia See Sheet L20 et eae Shrub Planting Hydrangea poniculota “Bobo” Juniperus chinensis vor. sorgentis See Sheet L40 1 24 Rides alpinum ‘Green Wound

(9) 8° PA (4) 3° UN (6) 8° Pco (4) & PC (3) 8 Pc (3) 3° Undiatubed wdgrode 249 large shrubs 256 shrubs. fat yy 0 moll shrubs 114 perenniola = 38 smell shrubs oa a0 Ya Sod ZN Scorty siden of plonting pt — 1016.54" 11 shode trees © shode trees as I rues 1 ered or dried. 29 ev. and/or om. \rees 0 ev. ond/or om. trees eo J Sod 4 J tt EET. ‘Place root boll on stable pubgrede. 204 lorge shruts 0 large shrubs Pa ‘excoveled val oround root Pat _ ‘boll bese to stobitre. Detention + Retention Areos — N/A ¢ ci 7 ET + Foundation Sa Deciduous Tree Planting (1) 3 ACF Londscope ores ‘amu 10" sith Minierum 10" width or Right—of—Woy Mecions — N/A HS Nw Ground Sqn v Z 7—S ied rit M Tenont sign (5' x 47) Moin Pork sign (4° x 10°) 120 9g. ft. londscope orea 60 99. fl. londacepe ores 282 9q. fl. londscope ores 304 9q. M. londscope crea (6) 8° PCO. (11) #1) spo: ——— Planting pt ameter 4° éeptn wvedded: (2) times rect bell bell Gomeler Tenont! sign Keep 6 inches trem trunk herdeced masch, oa ‘Set root bell 2° cbove finished grode. — (8) 267 /ues. er rect fore. =a (4) 8° Pic: - —— 4 Landecape Calculations | Landscape Arees (27) 91 AL Landscape Plan — Remove wire besket from lop Site Colcuiotions neers © of root boll, oo Co Totol Ste Area: 920,858 squore feet S TS percent Tote! Londscope Avec: 331,056 squore feet = aor — 25 percent mustreom compost 324,830 squore feet a oe Tetel Groundieyer Avea (Sod, No Mow ond Notive Grosses ond Forbs): No Mow Seed: 89,187 square feet rind A Undsturbed subgrose Native Grasses ond Forbs: 216.313 squore feet 19,330 square feet (“4 (Q) 3, aaa = ce, xt = = © ——- For Review Only gered or died. ‘Scary sides of plenting pr it 527.78 Poot} (13) J SPO: a. IS Do Not Use For Construction Placa root bell on stele Campoct escovated sol ereund root Prant List (15) 24° 7 Del bese Lo stabi. es ce ‘Shode Trees Common Nome a Parka a4 Q Qty. Sze 23 yr Acer x freemoni "Autumn Biore' ‘Autumn Bloze Freemon Nople es oe >} Existing 6” tree Existing 6" tree Existing 6” tree (1) 3 @o Evergreen Tree Planting ri) 4 Es cs Geditsia trioconthos vor. Inermia ‘Skyline Skyline Thomiess (17) #1 AL - Blended Seed Mix 12 Gymnociodus Goicus ‘Espresso’ Swamp White Ook Espresso Kentucky Cofleetree 3 } Chinkopin Ook a. (1) 3° cro: Existing 6" tee 16 } Quercus mocrocorpa Bur Ook gon DINE City Review Comments 327.9 4° depth thvedded hartooat — ‘Set rect boll 2° ebowe Existing 6] mich over entire planing bed. firiched rode. Evergreen Trees Botonical Nome Common Name Existing 6° tree City Review Comments 0327.19 Extend plonting bed @ of T beyond ost bel or os shown on pion. Maz a Picea glauca ‘Densate’ Block Hills Spruce Y Blended Seed Mix DAA review C aay TS percent existing vol 12 Fices giauce ‘Densote’ Block Hals Spruce 7638 Remora tap of buries. 3 percent mushroom compost 17 Fices obies Picea obies Norway Soruce No Mow’ Seed 762. DAA Review Comments are 2 Picea pungens Coloroda Green Spruce or sides of plonting pt 47 12 Picea pungens Colorodo Green Spruce (1) 3° GYD DAA Review Comments. fecluts] © ted. " 16 Pious syhrestris: Scoich Pine f Undaturted subgroda 12 Pinus sylvestris Scotch Fine For Review O19 a ‘i PiseesecaN Botanical Nome ‘Common Nome NOZ (2) loca root bol en sickle mubgrode. ‘bell bane te slabitve. Compect exceveled soll oround reat Bux 12 2° 2a ‘Aronia melonocorpa Low Scope “UC16S" Low Scope Mound Chokeberry 24° Gumus x Gethra olnifoka Ghicogolond Green Boxwood a Comus sericea “Isonti* laonti Redosier Ce? 24° Forsythia weidissime ‘Bronxensia’ Bronx Dwar! Forsythia Shrub Planting “ 2 Hydrangea paniculata “Bobo 23 24° 2° Incredibell Smooth Hydrangea n 2° Rides clpinum "Green Juniperus chinensis vor. sorgenti Green Mound Aine Curront 102 24° Rhus orometice ‘Gro-Low’ Gro-Low Fi 26 26° Syringa Bloomereng Dork Purple “SMSJEP7" Bloomerang Purple Ulec T depth munivoom compodt. over entire perenicl bed. RY Ce) Perencial plant Key Perennicls ond Omomentol Grosses Qty. Sie Botenical Nome (Common Nome ‘Specing os noted on plan, "@ cu ion Alaum "Summer ‘ecutifiora Kort Foerster’ Feather Reed Sf pt Uncieturbed subgrede HL x Hemerocoliis “Little Gropette’ Lite Gropette Doyity ery By Uctria spicata “Kobold” Kobold Blazing Stor 12" 6epth plenting mis PAM 28 Seich Gross Y, 73 percent dean topeat 23 percent mustvoom compost ScH uO 4 ae Rudbecka fulgide ‘Coldsturm’ Goldsturm Black-Eyed Suscn 0 90 Sporobolus heterclepis Prowie Dropaeed Porerrial Planting L3.0 ===== PDF PAGE 65 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] — Blended Seed Mix Wet Mesic Prairie Grass Mix (Short Grass Prairie Seed Mix + Wet Mesic Prairie Grass Mix) Wet Mesic Proitie Gross Mix Bolonical Nome Common Nome Lbs /Acre ‘Short Gross Provie Seed Mix Botonical Nore Common Nome Or/hcre Totol ths. /Aere Bive Joint Gross 0.0155 Corex bebbit Corex onnectens xonthocorpa Bebd's Yellow Sed 0.0315 a < ‘Se Cots roma Little Bivestem 120 Corex bicknelit Bickned's 0.300 0.0625 Bouteloua curtipenduic Byres conodensia Coneda Wid Rye 2B 12 Corex molesta Field Ovo! 0.125 Corex normotis Normal Sedge (1) 3 Totel Grosses: 160 10 Corex scoporia Fox Broom Sedge 0.0315 DuPage Business Center Forba Corex wulpinoideo Conogion Wid Rye 0.500 0.125 Botonical Nome ‘Common Nome Dymus weginicus Veginia Wid Rye 1.000 (13) 247 sve: Scannell O2/acre Total Iba. /Acre Gyceria strieto Wonne Gross 0.500 No Wow Seed [No Mow Seed Aaclepios tuberosa Butterfly Makweed Juncus spp. Rice Cut Gross 0.0158 “1 CER RES palmate Ponicum viegotum Leersia oryzoides ‘Switch Gross 0.125 0.125 Doles purpurea Echinocea pallida Purple Proirie Clover Pole Purple Coneflower Norsh Bie Grosa 0.500 3) ={ }+—(4) 3° auc Echineces purpurea Schizochyrium scoperium Lie Beste 1,000 West Chi kc Persternon digitata Foxglove Beord Tongue Oork Green Rush 0.250 Rudbeckéo hirta Physastegie virginiona Obedient Piont Sporobolus heterctepis Proirie Oropseed 0125 See Sheet L20 ae Ie Trodescontia chiensis Block-Eyed Suson 45 15 Total 5.0815 (here : . Permonent Metrix ‘5.0815 Lba/acre See Sheet L40 Tote! Forte: 25 (1) 3° ceo fe) 69 Cover with NAG S75BN Erosion Control Blonket (biodegradable). ba Tote! Grosses ond Forbs: 125 Temporary Cover Crop = (14) #1 SPO Botonical Nome Common Neme O2,/dcre Totol Ibs. /Acre (3) 8° PA No Mow Seed Mix (6) #1 CuK 6) it! (6) #1 CuK ‘Awena sativa Common Cots 160 10 Longfellow Chevings Fescue 23.60% Aopied at the rote of 25 Ibs. per ocre. Ghoriot Hord Fescue 23.06% 1184s ‘Shoreline Sender Creepi Red Fescue 11.90% ‘Na Now Seed T——No Mow Seed Wet Mesic Proirie Gross Mix Wevigotor Creeping Red Fescue 12.38% Ls) #1 AL aS Botonical Nome Common Nome Ube /hcre Heron Hord Fescue 11.76%, conodensis Blue Joint Gross 0.0155 Gulf Annual Ryegress 99x Corex onnectens ronthocorps Yellow 0.0315 No Mow Lown Wix with Annual Rye Nurse Crop (1) 3° @ ri) 2 Cores bebbii Bebb's 0.300 Proirie Nursery, Inc. (11) 24" Cores bicknel Bicknel'a 0.0625 No Now Seed: DAVID R. McCALLUM ASSOCIATES, INC. Corex normotis Corex moleste Field Oval 0.125 oosis Applied ot the rote of S Ibs. per 1,000 squore feet. Cover with North Americon Green S075. LANOSCAPE ARCHITECTS Corex scoporia Normal Sedge 0.250 12) 3° Corex wuipinoides Fox 0.125 ‘Seeding sholl occur weather permitting, prior to Noy 15 or ofter September 15, but prior to October 15, howe poo ‘62D Atteius Partensy 177496 | Liberty, Hincis 60048 Dymus conodensis Conedion Wid Rye 0500 Geen topsod sholl be required benecth oll no mow seeded creas ct a minimum depth of 6 inches. Q (1) 3*ceo T enc Dymus veginicus Wiginie Mid Rye Nonna Gross 0.500 1.000 Juncus spp. Gyeerie striate o.01s5 § a Leersia oryroides Rice Gut Gross 0.125 == Ponicum vegelum Seitch Gress 0.125 -4---------40-- Poa polustris Uitte Bivestem Morsh Bive Gross 0.500 1.000 Noles be Scirpus atrovirens Schizechyrium scoperium Dork Green Rush 0.250 ‘Mi sodded lawn recs sholl be inigoted with @ fully cutomatic lendscope irrigation system. ob Proirie Dropseed 012s 18 Sod Blend: HD2000 Kentucky Bluegrass or opproved equal, (10) 24° Bux ‘No Mow Seed Toto! Permonent Motrix 5.0815 Lbs /Acre -+——(14) #1 PAN 5.0815 tba /Acre Widflower Seed Mix: Overseed No Mow Seed Miz where indicoted on drawing with: 25% Aster New ater Cover with NAG S7SEN Erosion Control Blonket (biodegrodable), 28% Echinocea purpurea i = : 25% Solidago rugosa / Goldenrod (1) 24" (1) 3 ceo Pai! t——(1) 3° qua ‘25% Leuconthemum x / Doisy (7) #1 seo (11) 267 GE: Fire hydront Associ Es Aeply at the rate of 1/% pound/ocre. igs NI Gleon topscl sholl be required beneath off sodded orecs ot a minimum depth of 6 inches. ‘Mi sodded orecs sholl be irrigated with a fully culomotic irrigation system — see specification, oe (6) #1 CuK | (29) 24° Py Fy Cony The landscope controctor shell mointoin oll londscope creos until estobishment end occeptonce. Ad ry my € Pd up + (48) 24" FvB — (1) 3° Quy ij Kp tt) ub Landecape Calculations | Yard Requirements Ne Mow Seed Porkwoy (20 us temovetion Orive (723°) "iS those tees 11 = 4 new + 7 existing shode trees (i) 3° ats Y Y ‘No Mow Seed (26) 247 RHG ° (9) #1 AL: iY Ly (1) 3° ceo Poking Areca EA by a (4) 24" ARM. 4 Z ze Londscepe orea (200 spoces) Teo. 4848 aq. ft. \ (i), 3" cts: a (f IN LZ (9) #1 ALL. (24) #1 RUD Front_+ Exterior Side Yords | __(4) 8° PA Proposed C9) = A p—(19) 91 UA ‘South - 723° “3 mode Veet 40 203 21 1. ond/or om. trees ‘shrubs o 7S evergreen tees (1) 3° qu gf) Ke 521 smoll shrubs 0 smoll shrubs £7 le iG Z Detention + Retention Areos — N/A 45 A: (3) + aCe iJ Foundation N Y as Deciduous Tree Planting (5) 8 Psy Londscope ores Minimum 10° width Minienum 10° width 4 4j' Wildflower Seed Wix iB: ‘See Notes Right~ol-Wey Medions - N/A iX y [kg “ZI Sie 0, KA Wy Ground Sgna ib -———No Mow Seed MN) (x 10) ft. londscope orec 304 aq. fl. londscope oreo ZXD ‘ Moin Pork si ("x 4) 60 9q. ft. londscope oreo 252 9q. fl. londscope oreo a %; K/ en 3 pR Goneter 4° Gapin shredded: a (2) men rack bol bell Gometer (13) 8° RA A heréeoed mich. |e Sel rool ball 2° ehove fdshed grede. Koup 6 Inches from tron erect flere. ee Ds —_ Landecape Calcuations | Landscape Areas (1) 37 oD 185.89" Landscape Plan = © of rot bel. Ramors wire beskat from top Site Colasations LM Existing 10° Totel Ste Wes: ie? = —_= Ty ening vol Totel Londscope Ares: 331,056 squore feet 920,858 squore feet Ns 75 percent mushroom compost 324,830 squore feet =~ (5) 8° PA. SS = Totel Groundieyer Area (Sod, No Mow ond Notive Grosses ond Forbs}: 89,187 squore feet rind Existing 10° tree | Undiaturbed subgrade No Mow Seed: Native Grassea ond Forbs: 216,313 squore feet or a AL or ca ——— 19/330 squore feet > y/ - >= ~~ (2) 3° ue gered or cried. Scorty siges of planting pit i ARK Existing tree line For Review Only et — Wildflower Seed Mix Do Not Use For Construction ‘Poca reat boll on stable Plant List ~ £Q See Notes bat bese to slebiize. Compoct excoveted soll cround roel ‘Shode Trees Existing 10” tree Qty. Botanical Nome Common Nome 23 a ‘Autumn Blaze Freemon Mople po ee OS } ‘Acer x freemoni ‘Autumn Blaze’ . Evergreen Tree Planting 4 y Geditsia trioconthos vor. inermis ‘Sryine’ SS f\ ue 12 zy >; Quercus bicolor Gymnociodus Goicus “Espresso Eapressa Kentucky Coft rie, eect 13 a Quercus muehlenbergi Chirkopin Ook Seomp White Ook Easting 6° tree” 16 } Quercus: mocrocorpa Bur Ook City Review Comments 0327.9 4° begin Bovdied hertecet— Existing 6” bree. mich over entire planing bed. ‘Sat reot boll 2° sbeve firiched rode. Evergreen Trees Botenicol Nome Common Nome Cty Review Comments 0327.19 bed Key ef T' beyond rot bell or os Poo 21 Picea glauca ‘Densote’ Block Hills Spruce DAA review Comments cas shown on pion. TS percent existing sol 12 Fices giouce ‘Densote’ Block Hills Spruce ~ Remove tap of butap. 73 percent mushroom compost 12" Ficea obies Picea obies Nenway Spruce DAA Review Comments aes nu Picea pungens Colorodo Green Spruce Nerwoy Spruce sides of plenting pt it 47 12 DAA Review Comments cant YA) © diet, 16 Pinus sylvestris, ‘Scotch Pine a Undaturbed subgrede " 12" Pinus syivestria Scotch Pine For Review o1ag Botenicol Nome ‘Common Nome ‘Placa root boll on stable bell bene to stebitze. Compoct excoveted vol creund reat 12 24° Low Scope Mound Chokeberry zr 2 240 Gums x Glethra olnifola low sor ‘ucies* 2° Cormsa sericea ‘isonti’ lsonti Redosier Hummingbird Summertveet 2 Fornythia weidiasis ‘Bronrensia’ Bronx Dwort Forsythio ‘Shrub Planting “ 24 Hydrongea poniculote 6° tree 2 . 24° 26° ‘crborescens ‘incredibol” " 24° Rides alpinum ‘Green Wound’ chinensis vor. sorgenti 102 2 Rhus cromatice Sumoc 26 26° Syringa Bloomerang Purple Uloc ig T depth mushroom compost: Over ene perennial bed. Perennials ond Omamentol Grosses oN Perentiot plont Key Oty. Sze Botenical Nome Common Nome (1) 3° ceo ‘Specing os noted © pion. T=a0 es ae io Mium "Summer Beauty’ "@ Undieturbed mudyrede x Hemerocoliis ‘Uttie Gropette’ ccutifiora ‘Kort Foerster’ Feather Reed a Ustria spicota “Kobaid Kobold Blazing Stor Uitle Gropette Doyily 17” Gapth planting mis 28 Seitch Gross ~~ 73 percent dest lapsct ZS percent musivoom compost 2 “a Rudbecisa fulgida ‘Coldsturm’ Goldsturm Block-Eyed Susen a Pe 90 ‘Sporobolus heterclepia: Proie Dropseed = ~~ Perennial Planting L40 ===== PDF PAGE 66 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] we _ seat 110.09" —]—_ OFFICE MECHANICAL 100.00" Z\ / —_— —— a DECIDUOUS TREE ? _- —_— 90.00" ESTIMATED 5 YR HEIGHT mma BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION = 71.00" J: I TRUCK COURT i” me SITE SECTION - INNOVATION DRIVE @ WEST DRIVEWAY LOOKING NORTHEAST 110.00 [- auuoncpocksine —" _siGhT UNE» ea wv laonet =a AF EXISTING STREET TREES Bn TREES — TYPICAL MECHANICAL 90.00" APPROXIMATE HEIGHT. _ — = / AREA —" — DECIDUOUS TREE 80.00" ESTIMATED 5 YR HEIGHT mH SST paren, 65.00" NE, INNOVATION DRIVE SIDEWALK | 2 | TRUCK COURT - SITE SECTION - INNOVATION DRIVE LOOKING NORTH HT LINE_y wean wa 110.00" -_ = =.= —_ b [ wa 100.00" = _ corer et —_—— = ZX = 4 Poel — 80.00" 75.00" — _—_ _ BUILDING FLOOR 70.00" —_— ELEVATION = 71.00" aay — ONG: INNOVATION DRIVE | TRUCK COURT T SITE SECTION - INNOVATION DRIVE @ EAST DRIVEWAY LOOKING NORTHWEST f— TYPICAL PARAPET WALL AT OFFICE MECHANICAL —_ BUILDING DOCK-SIDE 110,00' Sj) LL _ = 100.00° —_ — DECIDUOUS TREE 2 2 —_ —__ ESTIMATED 5 YRHEI poor — 12’ HT EVERGREEN TREES | + Z\ - | —S =, 75.00" —_— _—“»- 70,00" a io) —_ — 65,00 q , L TRUCK COURT | a SITE SECTION - ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD LOOKING SOUTH ROOSEVELT ROvP off PaulWoodyARCHITECT SCANNELL PROPERTIES Scannell Development Proposed Facility 1 18 FEBRUARY 2019 1-04 MARCH 2019 MARCH 2019 447 South Sharon Amity Road; Suite 235, Charlotte, NC 28211 704.365.4932 paul@paubwoodyarch.com ===== PDF PAGE 67 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHICAGO DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM TITLE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: B.A. RFP for Central-Main Street Redevelopment Area FILE NUMBER: COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: Apr. 8, 2019 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE: STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE ITEM SUMMARY: The City of West Chicago had a Request for Proposal (RFP) drafted to seek developers for the vari- ous projects associated with the Central-Main Street Redevelopment Plan Update, accepted by the City Council in May 2018. Pete Kelly, the City’s Business Development Coordinator, will be on hand to highlight the contents of the Draft RFP and field any questions. The document contains a “Proposal Submission Process” in Section IX. The dates shown begin with an initial issuance of March 13, 2019 and conclude with a Proposal Submission Due Date of May 8, 2019. These are included only to show the approximate timeframes among the various steps in the submission process. They will be revised once a final RFP is in hand. ACTION PROPOSED: Discussion of the Draft RFP. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Draft RFP Downtown Redevelopment Area (dated March 13, 2019) ===== PDF PAGE 68 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHICAGO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Request for Developer Proposals DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AREA March 13, 2019 CITY OF WEST CHICAGO ===== PDF PAGE 69 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CITY OF WEST CHCAGO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Request for Developer Proposals DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AREA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Bxectitive Suinmary scmssscssssuowewme wearer aI 1 TE. Introduction 20.0.0... cccececeeeeeeeeeneeeeeeeeeeeeneeeaeeeeeeeeeeneeeeenees 2 Ill. Project Site Characteristics and Descriptions ...........ssssseseeeenes 3 IV. Market Factors/Development Feasibility ...............ccceeeeeaseeeees 5 V. — Land Use, Permits & Property Development .................esseeeeee 6 VI. City Development Objectives & Requirements ..........scccsseeeeees 4 VII. Redevelopment Project Proposal Guidelines ...................cce cee 8 VILL. ‘City of West Chicago, Participation .sisisnscavnnaresoeesssmnrawervanionnns 9 IX. Proposal Submission Process ..........ccccceceeeeeeneeneeseeesessenenes 11 ===== PDF PAGE 70 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] I. Executive Summary: The City of West Chicago is seeking a well-qualified developer partner for the phased acquisition and redevelopment of five different blocks of property located in West Chicago’s downtown area. The purpose of this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) is to solicit and evaluate the interest in, and ability of developers, or redevelopment groups, to work with the City to redevelop these five blocks to ultimately create a primarily transit-oriented residential/mixed-use neighborhood, over a period of five to eight years, commencing in approximately twelve months. The City intends to identify a developer, or redevelopment group, with whom the City can enter into a mutually negotiated redevelopment agreement(s) to accomplish this redevelopment vision. The five blocks, are located within the Central Business District. The combined total area of all five blocks is just over eight (8) acres (see Exhibit A for map of the five blocks). All are in close walking proximity to the Metra commuter train station. The City owns nearly all of the land on four of the five targeted blocks. All of the properties are located within the current “Downtown TIF District”, which expires in 2025. The City is considering options for creating a new TIF district later in 2019. This new TIF district would include these five blocks. The estimated time frame for accomplishing the establishment of the new TIF is four to six months. The blocks are surrounded primarily by single-family and multi-family housing, Sesquicentennial Park, and commercial uses along Main Street. The City recognizes that although this redevelopment process will be a collaborative effort among the developer and the City, the resulting redevelopment projects will be market driven. This RFP and other relevant information can be found at www.westchicagonow.org. Specific questions regarding this Request for Proposals process should be addressed to: Peter Kelly, Economic Development Coordinator City of West Chicago 475 Main Street West Chicago, IL 60185 (630) 293-2200 Ext 157 ===== PDF PAGE 71 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] I; Introduction: Over the past ten years, there has been an increasing interest in the suburban Chicago rental housing market in traditional, walkable neighborhoods in close proximity to commuter transportation, business districts, local parks, and community landmarks. Embracing this trend, the City of West Chicago desires to initiate the development of the five target blocks to serve as the catalyst for a generation of downtown investment in West Chicago. West Chicago West Chicago is situated in Chicagoland’s western suburbs, approximately 32 miles from ~ downtown Chicago. Its neighboring communities include Winfield, and Carol Stream to the east, Warrenville to the south, Geneva and St. Charles to the west, and Wayne to the north. Commuter rail transportation is available on the Union Pacific West line at West Chicago’s Metra station, located at 580 W. Main Street, a brief walk from any of the five blocks referenced in this RFP. Illinois Routes 38 (Roosevelt Road) and 64 (North Avenue) traverse approximately the southern and northern borders of the city from east to west. Both routes converge with Illinois Route 59 and Interstate 355, ultimately offering a connection with Interstate 88. Chicago’s O’Hare and Midway International Airports are both situated approximately 45 minutes from West Chicago. In addition, Fermilab, the United States’ premier particle physics laboratory, is just over two miles away, directly south of downtown West Chicago. The population of West Chicago is 27.447 (2015 Census estimate) spread over 14.80 square miles. The median age is 33.2 years, median household income is $71,250, and median home . value is $240,900. West Chicago has three public pre-schools, six public elementary schools, one public middle school, one public high school and Wheaton Academy. The West Chicago Park District has 390 acres of parkland divided among thirteen parks, including the Reed-Keppler Park, an 89-acre sports and recreational complex. Downtown West Chicago Downtown West Chicago is primarily focused along Main Street, which intersects Illinois Route 59, approximately one-quarter mile east of the five redevelopment blocks. The five redevelopment blocks are located within West Chicago’s Central Business District, zoned B-1 and R-6. (refer to Exhibit A for map). In anticipation of this RFP, and to set the stage for redevelopment of the five blocks, the City has made significant commitments and investments in the downtown area. Specifically, the City has acquired nearly all of the properties throughout four of the five redevelopment blocks, established a TIF district which encompasses the five redevelopment blocks, prepared studies and plans to guide the redevelopment of the five blocks, and upgraded some sidewalks and street lighting. In 2006, the City successfully partnered with a developer in the creation of a transient oriented mixed-use retail, office and residential condominium development on property that had been controlled by the City. The City plans to augment these efforts with additional public improvements, including, but not limited to, additional sidewalk and lighting upgrades, streetscapes, a gateway, and other infrastructure improvements. These additional improvements will be implemented in coordination with the private development efforts that result from this RFP. ===== PDF PAGE 72 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] III. | PROJECT SITE CHARACTERITICS AND DESCRIPTION: The subject property consists of five (5) blocks, containing 32 tax parcels, totaling just over eight (8) acres. The City owns almost all of four of the five blocks. Properties that are not vacant are subject to leases which can be terminated “at will” after September 30, 2019. Exhibit B contains details for each block, and each individual property within each block, including addresses, tax parcel numbers, lot dimensions, current use, and current zoning Transportation and Access The five redevelopment blocks are mapped in Exhibit A. These five blocks are situated between Illinois Route 59 to the east and the rest of the downtown to the west, along the north side of Main Street. Main Street is a two-lane local east-west route which extends from Prince Crossing Road at the east edge of West Chicago, across Illinois Route 59 (approximately one quarter mile east of the redevelopment blocks), to Washington Street in West Chicago’s downtown. Illinois Route 59 is a four (4) lane major north-south arterial route which provides direct access to Interstate 88 East-West Tollway and the I-88 regional office corridor. Route 59 has a traffic volume of 35,900 vehicles per day (“VPD”) where it borders downtown West Chicago, and Main Street sees an average of 8,450 VPD through the central business district. The Metra commuter train station is located across the street from Blocks 4 and 5 on the south side of Main Street Main Street. The Union Pacific West line provides service between downtown Chicago and Elburn. The ride from West Chicago to downtown Chicago is just under an hour, The 27,000 square foot West Chicago Public Library is also a short walk from any of the five redevelopment blocks. In addition, the Geneva spur of the 61-mile Illinois Prairie Path runs along Main Street, providing immediate access to this recreational pedestrian and cycling route. Surrounding and Subject Property Land Uses The five redevelopment blocks are generally surrounded by single-family residences and vacant residential lots to the north; a vacant residential lot to the east; Main Street and the Metra commuter train station and parking to the south, and a mix of single-family residential and commercial uses to the west. The subject blocks are briefly described below (refer to Exhibit B for additional details): Block 1 - consists of five (5) privately owned parcels, containing a paved parking area and bank drive-thru facility. Block 2 — consists of four (4) parcels, containing vacant land owned by the City Block 3 — consists of nine (9) parcels, containing of a mix of single-family residential and commercial uses and vacant land, all owned by the City Block 4 — consists of thirteen (13) parcels, containing single-family residential uses and vacant land, eleven (11) of which are owned by the City. ===== PDF PAGE 73 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Block 5 — consists of two (2) parcels owned by the City, containing the existing City Hall and parking lot, and one (1) privately-owned vacant parcel. Utilities The five redevelopment blocks are served by the City of West Chicago for all traditional municipal services. Potable water mains, storm sewer and sanitary sewer lines are in place and accessible within rights-of-way adjacent to the parcels. A map of municipal utilities is shown in Exhibit D. Any proposed development will be required to provide on-site utility connections. Storm water management improvements vary by redevelopment block based on existing and proposed impervious surface coverage. Storm water management strategies that incorporate both on-site and off-site methods will be required. The City has identified four potential existing off- site storm water detention locations. ===== PDF PAGE 74 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] IV. MARKET FACTORS/DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY A residential and commercial market analysis was completed in March, 2018 by Zimmerman/Volk Associates, a real estate consulting firm specializing in “on trend” absorption projections. The results of this study can be found in the larger “West Chicago Central-Main Street Redevelopment Plan Update”, March, 2018, which can be found on the City’s website. Generally, the analysis estimates that over a five-year time frame, the Central-Main Street Development Plan study area could absorb between 380 and 505 transit-oriented rental and for- sale housing units, distributed among 315 to 420 rental apartments, 30 to 40 condominiums, and 35 to 45 townhouses. The study results can be found, in its entirety, in the City’s “Central-Main Street Redevelopment Plan Updated”, dated March 2018 (refer to Exhibit C for summary of residential market study). ===== PDF PAGE 75 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] V. LAND USE, PERMITS AND PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT The City has in place development regulations which are similar to those found in other nearby Chicago suburban communities. All developers will be required to go through the normal land use and building permitting procedures and will be required to meet all existing city land use and building code requirements. The selected developer(s) will also be responsible for payment of all requisite building permit fees and bonds, utility connection fees, and other required or applicable fees typically assessed by the City and any other government entities, unless otherwise negotiated with the City. Applicable Codes West Chicago codes can be found on the City’s website. The following partial list of development codes are applicable within the City: West Chicago Zoning Ordinance 2105 International Building Code 2015 International Mechanical Code 2015 International Fuel Gas Code 2015 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code Illinois Plumbing Code 2014 Illinois Accessibility Code National Electrical Code 2014 Edition 2000 NEPA 101 — Life Safety Code The developer will be required to expressly agree that any submitted proposal and subsequent work performed shall be at all times comply with, and observe all Federal and State laws, local laws, ordinances, and regulations. Zoning Blocks 1, 3 and 5 are zoned B-1 Central Business District. Block 2 is zoned R-6 Multi-Family Residential. Block 4 contains both B-1 and R-6 zoning. Refer to the City of West Chicago Zoning Ordinance, which can be found on the City’s website. Current zoning limits building height to 48’, or four stories. The City will be receptive to proposals that require the City’s flexibility in its application of its Zoning Ordinance to achieve the most beneficial reuses of the blocks. Accordingly, the City will consider zoning variances such as those related to height restrictions, bulk regulations, conditional uses, and planned unit developments. Nevertheless, it will be the developer’s responsibility to secure any and all zoning relief actions and all other approvals that may be required, including following the necessary approval processes. Any approvals sought from the City are not guaranteed at this time, but staff will work cooperatively with the developer on proposals that are consistent with City goals and objectives and will endorse the same in the approval process. ===== PDF PAGE 76 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] The City recognizes that it will be required to relocate its City Hall from Block 5. The City has a site for a new City Hall already under its control, so the timing and details of this relocation will be driven by the developer’s proposal for this block, and any subsequent negotiations. Developer proposals need not necessarily be limited exclusively to the confines of the five target redevelopment blocks. Applicants should work with adjacent land owners where applicable. ===== PDF PAGE 77 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] VI. CITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES & REQUIREMENTS The following themes are an integral part of the City’s plan for redevelopment of the five target blocks: e Transit-Oriented Development - The City wishes to prioritize walkable, residential density near the Metra station, with complementary commercial uses that serve the new residences and draw others to the downtown. The City believes that transit-oriented development will appeal to younger, urban residents and empty nesters, who desire the multiple experiences offered by an entertaining downtown with access to both Chicago and Fox Valley amenities in a contemporary urban-living setting. e Assimilation with Surrounding Area - The parcels controlled by the City among the five redevelopment blocks make up a good portion of the overall acreage of the downtown. The integrated location of these multiple blocks throughout the area requires that redevelopment of these blocks respect the existing architectural integrity of the area, by assimilating well with, and complementing the character of the surrounding residential, commercial and public open spaces. e Quality Open Space —Redevelopment proposals should contemplate opportunities for the addition of open spaces to the downtown, especially where they can unify the development of the blocks with one another or the surrounding area. Open spaces could consist of such elements as plazas created by building setbacks, courtyards, pedestrian paths, pocket parks, tot lot playgrounds, etc. They should provide high quality, visible, inviting settings which encourage social interaction, civic engagement, and outdoor enjoyment that creates a civic or passive use space for the downtown area. e Storm Water Management — The City has adopted the DuPage County Storm Water and Floodplain Management Ordinance and local amendments and will work with prospective developers to guide them through the engineering process. Storm water requirements will vary by block and by project, and will be met with either on-site management, off-site management, or some combination of both. The City has four potential locations for off-site storm water management improvements (refer to Exhibit D for these locations) e Design Guidelines - Refer to Exhibit E for broad design guidelines for the target redevelopment blocks, taken from the City’s “Central-Main Redevelopment Plan Update”. The entire document can be found on the City’s website. ===== PDF PAGE 78 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] VII. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROPOSAL GUIDELINES The City offers the following specific guidelines to keep in mind as part of the RFP process: The City seeks a developer partner for the redevelopment of the five target blocks. The City will participate in the redevelopment of the five blocks by providing control of the properties, and public improvements and infrastructure that is consistent with the developer’s redevelopment plans. The City will also consider additional participation through other public financial assistance, potentially employing TIF finance mechanisms. That said, the City encourages the submission of viable market- driven redevelopment projects that yields a reasonable return on the developer’s investment. The City does not expect all five blocks to necessarily be redeveloped simultaneously. In addition, the blocks need not be developed as part of a single “master-plan”, but rather, may be conceived as separate, independent developments. Accordingly, the City is open to proposals that provide for phased redevelopment projects, block(s) by block(s). Later phases may be presented as contingent upon successful completion of prior redevelopment projects. Prospective developers should submit proposals that focus on the development of Blocks 2, 3, and 4 first, although proposals may consist of proposed developments for as many as all five blocks. Blocks | and 5 contain existing structures that currently house on-going operations that may require more time for relocation. (Refer to Exhibit B for the specific details regarding the current use of each parcel). The City-selected developer or development group will be given exclusive rights to negotiate with the City, for a limited and timely period to be determined. ===== PDF PAGE 79 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] VIII. CITY OF WEST CHICAGO PARTICIPATION The City has participated in previous public/private partnerships within the downtown and understands that inducements may be required to successfully redevelop the five target blocks. The City has already acquired a significant portion of the properties throughout the five redevelopment blocks, prepared studies and plans to guide the redevelopment of four of the five blocks and upgraded some sidewalks and street lighting. The City will carefully evaluate developer requests for direct City involvement and/or financial inducements. Potential Incentives The five blocks are located within the current City of West Chicago “Downtown TIF District”. This TIF district is due to expire in 2025. The City is considering replacing this TIF district this year, with a new TIF district, whose boundaries would still incorporate the five redevelopment blocks. The new TIF would expire in 2042 if initiated this year. The City may use funds from the potential new TIF to facilitate projects that meet the objectives of the TIF Redevelopment Plan. Such funds could be used for property acquisition, building demolition, site preparation, public improvements and infrastructure, among others. Any development agreements that the City enters into with the selected developer would be subject to conformity with TIF statutes. In addition to TIF resources, the City of West Chicago has a Retail and Restaurant Business Grant Program. Grants available under the Program at any particular time are subject to the then-available funding as budgeted from time to time by the City of West Chicago within the Downtown TIF Fund, A maximum $10,000 matching grant amount is available. The City also has a Facade Improvement Program in which up to $10,000 is available for facade renovations each year, up to a maximum of three years that can be collected at once. Sales/Purchase Price of City-Owned Properties Proposals should identify the price(s) that the developer is willing to pay the City for its properties, if any. Please note, however, that any discussions pertaining to the sale of any properties to the developer will not occur during the RFP solicitation period. Rather, should a submitted proposal warrant further consideration, as determined through the review process, applicants will be contacted to enter into negotiations regarding the prospective sale price(s) and/or any financial considerations that would be appropriate for a prospective development. No brokerage fees will be paid by the City. Sales Tax Rebates The City of West Chicago is a home rule municipality. As such, any sales tax revenue sharing agreements will be subject to Illinois State statutes and the City’s evaluation of need for such agreements. ===== PDF PAGE 80 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Environmental Remediation and Site Prep Costs All but two of the City-owned parcels in the five blocks are, or were previously, occupied by single-family homes, so it is anticipated that no brownfield conditions exist on any of the parcels built-out as residential dwellings. Tax parcel (PIN) 04-101-130-01-0000 contains an auto repair shop, which may require further evaluation. To the extent that any environmental remediation/removal is found to be necessary, TIF funds may be applied to those costs, subject to agreement by the City. The City will work with the selected developer to re-locate and/or bury utilities to complement the proposed development, based on project characteristics and available funding. Access to the Sites The City authorizes and encourages prospective developers to visit the parcels as part of their due diligence in preparing their proposals. Prospective developers are encouraged to incorporate their findings in their proposals, to the extent existing site conditions have implications for their proposed developments. ===== PDF PAGE 81 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] [X. | PROPOSAL SUBMISSION PROCESS The table below delineates the various milestone dates for the RFP submittal process: City of West Chicago Issue Date of RFP Wednesday, March 13, 2019 City of West Chicago Pre-Proposal Q and A Thursday, March 28, 2019 Meeting for Prospective Developers (see below for details) Letter of Intent to Apply Due Date Wednesday, April 3, 2019 Proposal Submission Due Date Wednesday, May 8, 2019 Pre-Proposal O and A Session City staff members will hold a question and answer session for developers who may have interest in submitting a proposal in response to this RFP on Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council chambers, at City Hall, 425 Main Street. This will be an opportunity for City staff to walk prospective developers through the RFP, and for prospective developers to ask questions and present comments. Letter of Intent Any prospective developer shall submit a Letter of Intent by 4:00 p.m. on the date indicated in the table, above. The Letter of Intent should indicate the prospective developer's desire to submit a formal proposal by the proposal submission due date shown above. The letter shall also include the name(s) of the relevant parties that will be submitting the proposal. The letter of intent may be submitted electronically to pkelly@westchicago.org , or by hard copy, and should be transmitted to the Pete Kelly, Economic Development Coordinator. Please note that submission of a letter of intent does not obligate any entity to submit a proposal. In addition, failure to submit a letter of intent by the due date will not necessarily disqualify a proposal that is later submitted. Format and Delivery of Proposal Proposals shall be submitted to Pete Kelly, Economic Development Coordinator, 475 Main Street, West Chicago, IL 60185, by no later than 4:00 p.m. on May 8, 2019. Both single and multiple submissions may be made. If multiple submissions are made, they must be submitted independently of one another. Ten (10) printed copies should be submitted, along with one (1) electronic copy. The electronic copy shall be in a PDF format and shall be transmitted via a flash drive to pkelly@westchicago.org . ===== PDF PAGE 82 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Proposals should be presented in a standard 8-2” x 11” format (11” x 17” graphics can be folded into the proposal). Upon receipt of each proposal, the City will send an acknowledgement of its receipt. Proposers who do not receive said acknowledgement of within twenty-four hours of sending should follow up by phone with specific information identifying the originating email address for message recovery. Proposals will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law. Proposal submissions should be divided into the distinct sections shown below. For multiple proposals, each proposal should be divided into the below sections. Project(s) Description A project description should identify which blocks are included in the proposals, and for each block should include, at a minimum the following: Proposed uses for the development(s) (residential, commercial, retail, etc.), Proposed building masses and heights Proposed architectural style(s) Proposed number of units Proposed unit mixes Proposed parking and loading facilities Proposed market price-points of the product Proposed exterior spaces (open spaces/landscaping/paving/pedestrian and vehicular concepts, etc.) Areas proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the approximate size of each area Provide estimate of number of temporary and permanent jobs to be created by the proposed development(s) Provide estimated timelines, including any proposed phasing Identification of any other real estate parcels, exclusive of the those within the five target blocks, that are included in the proposed development(s), and a description of any conditions precedent to their acquisition and development Development Team Description Provide the name and contact information for the individual from the development team with whom the City will correspond Identify the members of the development team and their respective roles, including prospective purchasers/property owners, developers, general partners, property managers/operators, and any other significant stakeholders Describe the experience/track record and overall qualifications of each member of the development team, especially any previous experience with public partnerships and/or similar developments ===== PDF PAGE 83 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Financial Structure Description A statement which details the financial structure and proposed method of financing the development(s), including: e Summary sources and uses of funds e Evidence of construction and permanent financing sources’ intent or commitment to fund the proposed development, if any e Evidence that the development team has the financial capacity to successfully execute the proposed development(s) e Evidence of any other marketability of the proposed development(s) Any proposal in which public incentives are contemplated must include a detailed rationale for such incentives in the form of a “gap analysis” consisting of detailed sources and uses of funds (including hard and soft costs), a ten to twenty year pro forma, and an identification of extraordinary costs associated with the proposed development. The pro forma shall include bases and assumptions for income and expenses, absorption rates, escalation rates, property and sales taxes generated, disposition values, cap rates, etc. The City reserves the right to request additional information or documentation to evaluate the bases for the incentive. City Participation Description The proposals(s) should describe what assistance from the City, if any, is necessary in order for the redevelopment to be feasible. This should include: e Any required land price adjustments being sought by the developer(s) e Any adjustments to municipal fees. e Incentives available through the TIF Act, or other City resources e Any other incentives, including and County, State, or Federal incentives Requests for City incentives should clearly outline how those City incentives will fit into the total development package. The developer must demonstrate that the requested incentives are necessary for the proposed development(s) to be accomplished (i.e. the “but for’) at competitive fair market costs and adequate returns to the developer(s), without creating any unreasonable burdens to the City. It is anticipated that any local incentives granted will be financed by the property tax increment created by the redevelopment(s), and/or by additional sales taxes generated by the redevelopment(s). Design Description e The design professionals to be utilized on the project(s) must be identified, along with evidence of their experience, particularly on similar projects. e Provide preliminary architectural concept renderings, such as proposed site plans, proposed exterior elevations, etc. e Describe how the proposed development(s) relates to the City’s vision of transforming its downtown area into a transit-oriented residential/mixed use ===== PDF PAGE 84 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] neighborhood, and its requirements for assimilation with the surrounding area and open space. e Describe how the development will enhance the attractiveness of the area e Describe how the redevelopment(s) will be compatible with the surrounding area in terms of overall character. e Describe any zoning relief or amendments that will be required Note: The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals or addendums thereto, to negotiate the terms of any proposal, and to waive any technicality in any proposal submitted. In addition, the City may choose to accept any part of a proposal or two or more different proposals as the City deems necessary and/or appropriate. The City also reserves the right to allow only a portion of a block to be developed. If redevelopment negotiations cannot be concluded successfully with the chosen developer or development group, the City may negotiate an agreement with any other developer or development group without notice and without re-issuing another RFP. Addenda In the event that it is necessary to provide additional clarification or revisions to the RFP, as well as any supplementary information pertaining to the RPA effort, the City will distribute said addenda to all developers who have filed a Letter of Intent. Additionally, the addenda will be posted on the City’s website at www.westchicagonow.org .. For those parties who do not file a Letter of Intent, but who plan to submit a proposal, it will be those parties’ responsibility to regularly monitor the City’s website for said addenda. X. PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS The below criteria will be considered by the City in its evaluation of developer proposals. The order in which they are shown below does not represent their relative significance in the evaluation process. Overall Planning/Design: e Compatibility of proposed development with the City’s vision for the downtown as a transit-oriented residential/mixed use neighborhood that will attract younger urban residents, empty nesters, and new businesses (refer to the City’s “Central-Main Street Redevelopment Plan Updated” and its “West Chicago Strategic Plan’). e Design compatibility with the existing character and scale of the downtown area e Proposed residential unit mix, including types of units, amenities, services ¢ Proposed commercial uses and tenants ===== PDF PAGE 85 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Developer Qualifications: Developer or development group qualifications, including experience with projects of similar scope, nature and complexity, experience with public/private development partnerships, and downtown projects. The financial capability of the developer or individuals of the developer group. This will be thoroughly reviewed prior to final developer selection. This includes demonstration that commitments are either in place or can be readily established to deliver financing and tenants for commercial spaces. Financial Feasibility: The feasibility of the proposed method(s) of financing The extent of the financial assistance being requested from the City will be examined closely. Proposals which leverage the City’s overall investment into the highest neighborhood impact, along with the greatest return on the City’s investment will get the most attention. The extent of public sector investment in public improvements Proprietary Information Any restrictions on the use of information contained within any proposal shall be clearly stated as such on the front page of the proposal. Please note that the City will only be able to comply with confidentiality requests to the extent allowed by law. ===== PDF PAGE 86 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT A TARGET BLOCK MAPS CITY OF WEST CHICAGO CENTRAL BUSINESS T.I.F. DISTRICT 54.5 ACRES -+—+ RAILROAD T1.F BOUNDARY [J rarcets ma = D00 L333 OOL = HONI 1 Y N ===== PDF PAGE 90 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] HIGH STREET 0410109011 0410109012 AAIN 0410109013 TURNER 0410109014 STREE COURT CENTERSTREET BLOCK2-DOWNTOWNREDEVLOPMENTPLAN N 1INCH=1OOFEET DOCUMENTNAME:2OI9_MAINSTEETBLOCR2CATHO ===== PDF PAGE 91 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] © RX ag oer an? < aS S SE we so oe x pS ot” of ane oo Rog oo a om aD aa a 3 ot “14 ‘N ye a? a xe aad Co oF SRG x a iL BLOCK 3- DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMENT PLAN A 1 INCH = 100 FEET BOCUMENT MasAm: 2019_/AAINSTREETELOCHS ===== PDF PAGE 92 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] CHAUORDOTHAATML SN" 6IOr aN ANaWn 05 413335 OOL = HONI 1 Y N NW1d LNSWdO1A3038y ===== PDF PAGE 93 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] i 1 INCH = 100 FEET DOCUMENT NAME; 2010 MAMSTREETELOCKA bvO6LLOLrO OvOéLLOL¥O SEOSLLOL¥O BENSILLOLPO Zz , o k Z W Ps o 10} za > W Q Ww wr Zz 5s 0 ke Z 5 fe) Q + x ) 0 J 0 ===== PDF PAGE 94 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] 0410119041 ° : 2 3 A 1 INCH = 100 FEET DOCUMENT NAME 2019_MAINSTREETBLOCKIORNO ===== PDF PAGE 95 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] & 7 ae 9 O Oo co » CO COLFORD AVENUE q 2 & & : : = x Pal Pol MAIN STREET er ee! os § BLOCK 5- DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMENT PLAN A 1 INCH = 100 FEET DOCUMENT MAMIE 2019 MAINSTREETBLOCKS ===== PDF PAGE 96 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] OLFORD AVENUE MAAIN STREE BLOCK5-DOWNTOWNREDEVLOPMENTPLAN N HICAGO 1INCH=1OOFEET DOCUMENTNAME2OI9_MAINSTREETELOCKSORTHO ===== PDF PAGE 97 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT B TARGET BLOCK EXISTING CONDITIONS PIN ADDRESS ACREAGE APPROXSQ.FT. ZONING CURRENT USE OWNERSHIP 0410106009 N/A 0.19 8,276 B-1 Parking lot Private 0410106010 N/A 0.14 6,098 B-1 Parking lot Private 0410106011 N/A 0.16 6,970 B-1 Parking lot Private 0410106012 N/A 0.20 8,712 B-1 Parking lot Private 0410106015 121 GALENA ST 0.41 17,860 B-1 Parking/Bank Drive Thru Private Total 1.10 47,916 PIN ADDRESS ACREAGE APPROXSQ.FT. ZONING CURRENT USE OWNERSHIP 0410109011 210 HIGH ST 0.20 8,712 R-6 Vacant City 0410109012 216 HIGH ST 0.20 8,712 R-6 Vacant City 0410109013 222 HIGH ST 0.20 8,712 R-6 Vacant City 0410109014 228 HIGH ST 0.20 8,712 R-6 Vacant City Total 0.80 34,848 PIN ADDRESS ACREAGE _APPROXSQ.FT. ZONING CURRENT USE OWNERSHIP 0410113001 305 MAIN ST 0.40 17,424 B-1 Commercial City 0410113002 321 MAIN ST 0.15 6,534 B-1 Residential City 0410113003 327 MAIN ST 0.07 3,049 B-1 Vacant City 0410113004 302 HIGH ST APT 1 0,19 8,276 B-1 Residential City 302 HIGH ST APT 2 Residential City 0410113005 308 HIGH ST 0.19 8,276 B-1 Vacant City 310 HIGH ST Vacant City 0410113006 314 HIGH ST APTA 0.19 8,276 B-1 Residential City 314 HIGH ST APTB Residential City 314 HIGH ST APT C Residential City 0410113007 322 HIGH ST 0,19 8,276 B-1 Residential City 0410113009 333 MAIN ST 0.14 6,098 B-1 Vacant City 0410113010 109 CHICAGO ST 0.13 5,663 B-1 Residential City 328 HIGH ST 328 1/2 HIGH ST Total 1.65 71,874 BLOCK 4 PIN ADDRESS ACREAGE _APPROXSQ.FT. ZONING CURRENT USE OWNERSHIP 0410119001 305 MAIN ST 0.18 7,841 B-1 Vacant City 0410119002 411 MAIN ST 0.14 6,098 B-1 Residential City 0410119003 114 CHICAGO ST 0.10 4,356 R-6 Vacant City 0410119004 120 CHICAGO ST 0.10 4,356 R-6 Vacant City 0410119005 202 CHICAGO ST 0.20 8,712 R-6 Vacant City 0410119006 206 CHICAGO ST 0.10 4,356 R-6 Residential City 0410119037 419 MAIN ST 0.29 12,632 B-1 Vacant City 421 MAIN ST Vacant City 0410119038 435 MAIN ST 0.26 11,326 B-1 Residential City 0410119039 441 MAIN ST 0.20 8,712 B-1 Residential City 0410119040 447 MAIN ST 0.20 8,712 B-1 Residential City 0410119041 453 MAIN ST 0.20 8,712 B-1 Vacant City Total 1.97 85,813 PIN ADDRESS ACREAGE APPROXSQ.FT. ZONING CURRENT USE OWNERSHIP 0410119042 461 MAIN ST 0,33 14,375 B-1 Residential City (Deeded) 0410119043 475 MAIN ST 1.00 43,560 B-1 Public/City Hall City 0410119069 487 MAIN ST 0.86 37,462 B-1 Vacant Private Total 2.19 95,396 ===== PDF PAGE 98 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXHIBIT C RESIDENTIAL MARKET STUDY SUMMARY ZIMMERMAN/ VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. Post Office Box 4907 Clinton, New Jersey 08809 908 735-6336 InfloWZV A.ce* www. ZVA.ce Research & Strategic Analysis AN ANALYSIS OF RESIDENTIAL MARKET POTENTIAL The Central-Main Street Redevelopment Plan Study Area City of West Chicago, DuPage County, Illinois March, 2017 This analysis has found that, from the market perspective, over a five-year timeframe, between 380 and 505 transit-oriented rental and for-sale housing units can be supported within the Central-Main Street Redevelopment Plan Study Area. Based on market preferences, the housing mix would include 315 to 420 rental apartments, 30 to 40 condominiums, and 35 to 45 townhouses. The 315 to 420 rental units include the following: Transit-oriented studios to wwo-bedroom apartments ranging in size between 500 and 1,050 square feet with proposed base rents ranging between $950 and $1,850 per month ($1.76 to $1.90 per square foot). The weighted average rent of the rental apartments is $1,400 for an average unit size of 768 square: feet, an average of $1.82 per square foot. Absorption is forecast at 63 to 84 rental units per year. The 30 to 40 condominium units include the following: One- and two-bedroom condominiums ranging in size between 800 and 1,400 square feet, with proposed base prices ranging between $165,000 and $265,000 ($189 to $206 per square foot). The weighted average price is $222,000, for an average unit size of 1,138 square feet, an average of $195 per square foot. Absorption is forecast at six to eight units per year. The 35 to 45 townhouses include the following: Two- and three-bedroom townhouses ranging in size between 1,100 and 1,800 square feet, with proposed base prices ranging between $225,000 and $350,000 ($194 to $205 per square foot). The weighted average price is $292,750, for an average unit size of 1,485 square feet, an average of $197 per square foot. Absorption is forecast at seven to nine units per year. ===== PDF PAGE 99 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT D PUBLIC UTILTIES MAP a rhs —9 oo S. oy EFORLAVEN s— — —o anna 4 o—__. [le a ~Y —.. i] =8 \o DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMENT PLAN- UTILITIES Sanitary lines ——— Stonn lines Water lines 1 INCH = 250 FEE BOCWAtNT Nas 2017 ALLBLOOKS imum ===== PDF PAGE 100 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] EXHIBIT E BROAD DESIGN GUIDELINES (refer to the “Central-Main Street Redevelopment Plan Updated”, March 2018 on City website) o Key Vision Recommendations Fricourage High Dansity Residential Nozr Staten West Chicago is @ natural fit for TOD, Other Chicagoland suburbs, who algo have Metra stations near the Downtown core, are capltalizing on TOD, To leverage this asset, the City shoukt encourage 4 minimum of four storles, illustrated tn the Vislon Plan as five-storics, for mixed-use development across from the station, ‘The development may incrementally step dovm in height away from Main Street where it is closer to the single- family neighborhood beyond. As redevelopment occurs and parking needs change with the introduction of drivertess cars and the increasing ridesharo industry, the Metra parking lot immediately adjacent to the station may become available for mixed-use redevelopment (see page 1) Allow Taller Sullding Heights Alon Figure 19 Like Block 5 which fronts onto Main Street, the frontages of Blocks 3 and 4 should be redeveloped with a maximun of five-story buildings. These facades will play a siguificant role in adding to the perceived walkability from Metra station to Doventown core, These buildings should also provide residential entrances along the facades and commercial storefronts at intersections. ‘The buildings should be located near the front property line with minimal setbaclt, except in the case of a small Jandscape buffer or private outdoor space. Allowing the taller, five-story buildings may be the difference between o project boing financially feasible or not, so consideration of the trade- offs should be heavily weighed. Building stopbacks towards the smaller scale neighborhood and only allowing five-stories within HO feet from the Main Street property line may help mitigate the taller height along Main Street, Redevelopmentalong High Street should respect the scale ofthe historic single-family homes on the north side of the street, A residentlal vernacular should help complement the scale and character of the homes, while allowing for a higher density product type to support more Downtown living (see page 10) Centrel-Hain Street Redevelopment Plan Update ===== PDF PAGE 101 ===== [Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)] Creata n Searles of Landmarks Through Downtown Figure 20° Introducing a series of visual landmarks would greatly enhance waytinding and architectural character, The Vision Plan demonstrates strategic locations for architectural towers and comer public spaces that attempt to draw people down Main Street and into the Downtown core. These visual Iindimarks occur each time the street bends. The corner public spaces should include water features to reinforce West Chicago as a city of fountains, (see page 11) fulld a Park to Support Downtown Residents To address one of the most glaring Doventown deficiencies, the City should commission a landscape architect or Incentivize a private developer to complete the design of a neighborhood pocket park and tot lot playground at the corner of Center Street and High Street. This location is already a viscant Kot that hiss provided recreational space for the cocmuuity. The current site is oversscaled for the size of Downloven, sa redevelopment on a portion of this City-owned lot ix reconunender, The packet park should include @ variety of active and passive program options, such as a tot lot playground, exercise equipment, flexible lawn seating. a water feature, sidewalks, or any other program that complements the surrounding neighborhood. As designs are finalized for the West Washington Street Plan, the uses within the two parks should be coordinated to avoid overlapping programming. (see page 11)