===== PDF PAGE 1 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Y OF
Cit
WEST CHICAGO
WHERE HISTORY & PROGRESS MEET
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Monday, July 8, 2019
7:00 P.M. - Council Chambers
AGENDA
Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of a Quorum
Approval of Minutes
A. May 13, 2019
Public Participation
Items for Consent
A. 470 West Roosevelt Road — Amendment to the Preliminary PUD for Lot 1 of the Jigged
Ventures Subdivision to allow “Motor Vehicles Sales, Internet based” as a permitted
use.
Items for Discussion
A. 560 & 600 West Roosevelt Road — Amendments to the Preliminary PUD for Lots 2-4
and Final PUD for Lots 1-2 for the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision to allow an Atlas
Bobcat facility and ancillary outside storage for Groebner & Associates, respectively.
Unfinished Business
New Business
Reports from Staff
A. Update on RFP for Central Main Street Redevelopment
Adjournment
475 Main Street T (630) 293-2200 Ruben Pineda
West Chicago, Illinois F (630) 293-3028 j Mayor
60185 www.westchicago.org Nancy M. Smith Mies 1. Guttman

===== PDF PAGE 2 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Draft
MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
May 13, 2019, 7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of a Quorum.
Alderman Stout called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
Roll call found Aldermen James Beifuss, Melissa Birch Ferguson, Michael Ferguson,
Bonnie Gagliardi, Matt Garling, Jayme Sheahan and Rebecca Stout present.
Also in attendance was Community Development Director, Tom Dabareiner and
Economic Development Coordinator, Pete Kelly.
2. Approval of Minutes.
A. April 8, 2019.
Alderman Beifuss moved and Alderman Garling seconded a motion to approve the
minutes. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Birch Ferguson, Ferguson, Gagliardi,
Garling, Sheahan and Stout. Voting Nay: 0.
3. Public Participation. None.
4. Items for Consent.
A. Plat of Consolidation, 1817 and 1827 Blackhawk Drive.
Alderman Birch Ferguson moved and Alderman Garling seconded a motion to
approve this Item for Consent. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Birch Ferguson,
Ferguson, Gagliardi, Garling, Sheahan and Stout. Voting Nay: 0.
5: Items for Discussion.
Development Committee Minutes
May 13, 2019
Page 1 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 3 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
A. Forming America, 1200 N. Prince Crossing — Biannual Progress Report.
Tom Dabareiner provided this item update, noting the owner of Forming America was
present. The applicant received a Special Use Permit for an outside storage yard in
August of 2007, which has included four amendments with several site improvements to
be completed by specific dates. Earlier this year, the City Council approved a final
completion deadline of July 31, 2019.
The applicant, Mr. James Langkamp, addressed the members. He stated that he has left to
pave the back of the lot, and with better weather, they are ready to begin. Alderman Stout
said that staff will be in touch with him as the deadline approaches, and thanked him for
attending.
B. Midwest Industrial Funds, 2525 and 2555 Enterprise Circle (DuPage Business
Center) — Final Development Plan Review.
Tom Dabareiner indicated the representatives for Midwest Industrial Funds were present.
They are requesting Final Development Plan approval for the construction of two
speculative warehouses/distribution buildings on 29 acres south of Fabyan Parkway and
west of Enterprise Circle in the DuPage Business Center. The northern most building,
2525 Enterprise Circle, is a cross-docked facility of some 303,000 square feet with a total
of 47 docks. Berms are being provided to block the view of the loading docks from
Fabyan Parkway. There are 210 parking spaces, with an additional 28 land-banked
spaces. The second building at 2555 Enterprise Circle will be 186,000 square feet with 38
loading docks that will not be visible from Enterprise Circle. Staff requests two
conditions—one related to landscaping and the other to screening of rooftop
mechanicals—be placed on the approval. DuPage Airport Authority (DAA) recently
approved this plan, but based on our Agreement, both the City and the DAA need to
approve it. Staff acknowledges that the proposal does comply.
Alderman Beifuss asked about the conditions. Mr. Dabareiner indicated that if the parapet
is not high enough to screen the rooftop mechanicals, the condition would require the
applicant to provide additional walls.
Alderman Garling moved and Alderman Gagliardi seconded a motion to approve
Item C. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Birch Ferguson, Ferguson, Gagliardi,
Garling, Sheahan and Stout. Voting Nay: 0.
C. IDI Logistics, Fabyan Parkway — Review & Discussion.
Development Committee Minutes
May 13, 2019
Page 2 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 4 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Tom Dabareiner provided this item update. IDI Logistics is national investor and
developer of distribution facilities, and they are working with Home Depot to locate a
warehouse/distribution center in the Chicago area. There is a 55-acre site south of
Roosevelt Road and east of Fabyan Parkway that could host a 650,000 square foot site,
linked to the BNSF railway, and would employ 100 full-time workers. The building
would accommodate two rail spurs and 31 loading docks. Truck traffic is estimated to be
235 per day, with a peak of 300 per day. Access would be off of Fabyan Parkway,
although he noted that if the road is extended to Roosevelt Road, there would be
additional access. There would be some outside storage near the rail spurs on the south
side of the building, but berms and landscaping would obscure the view for the
surrounding properties. TIF revenue may be required to help offset some of the costs.
Staff noted a couple of concerns with regards to rezoning from ORI to M, the traffic
projections which did not include car counts nor disclose the supporting detail, and
finally the timing of the improvements. DuPage County is proposing to widen Fabyan
Parkway, which would impact the design of the site proposal and add more traffic to the
area.
The other part of this project would include a hotel, but it could not commence without a
signalized intersection along Roosevelt Road. Other concepts such as self-storage might
be included to act as a buffer between the hotel and the warehouse/distribution facility.
There has been some interest from a retail developer about this. Mr. Dabareiner indicated
that staff has had discussions about linking the hotel/commercial phase more closely with
the Home Depot phase. A PUD to consider the entire 80+ area will likely be required to
coordinate the land use. At this point, Home Depot is looking at a number of sites for
their new ecommerce concept, and they need to determine the City’s level of interest for
this project. He introduced the representative of IDI Logistics who was present to answer
the members’ questions.
Jeff Lanaghan, Market Officer for IDI Logistics, spoke to the Committee. IDI is a 30-
year industrial development company. He stated they were present to ask for a
recommendation to move this project forward to the Planning Commission and Zoning
Board of Appeals (PC/ZBA) and to answer any question the Committee members have.
He recapped the project details. While they are still learning more about the project from
Home Depot, this location is at the top of their list. He clarified that the estimate of daily
truck volume was not just for semi-trucks. Mr. Lanaghan then spoke about Home Depot’s
current procedure for serving ecommerce, and how this presents certain challenges for
their stores. As a result, they have come up with a concept whereby contractors can place
orders and then have the materials delivered to the job site the next day. He mentioned
the advantages for consumers of this business model and that this would only be the third
site of its kind in the USA. They hope to have it up and running by 2020, and they
believe this is the perfect site for them. They are looking at other sites, but IDI hopes to
Development Committee Minutes
May 13, 2019
Page 3 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 5 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
show them they have speed to market. He spoke about the site as a whole and that it has
been undeveloped for the 20+ years it has been in the hands of the current owner. There
is currently no infrastructure at this property, and they estimate the cost for it to be
around 7 to 8 million dollars. The taxes on this building would support a TIF request of
10 to 12 million, but since they are only looking for infrastructure funding, there would
be a surplus of tax revenue. The project has a lot of roadway to be built, not counting the
widening of Fabyan Parkway. They believe the cost of the project to be somewhere in the
70 to 80-million-dollar range. He concluded his presentation saying that they hope to
receive a favorable recommendation from the Committee.
Alderman Gagliardi asked if the location would be ecommerce only, and Mr. Lanaghan
replied that it will be a warehouse/distribution facility and it will serve their ecommerce.
There will be about 180 full-time employees with about half being Home Depot
employees.
Alderman Beifuss asked if any sales would be done out of this facility, and Mr. Lanaghan
believed there would not be. Alderman Beifuss asked questions about the inbound versus
outbound vehicle types and the difference between the “BDC” and “FDC” truckloads.
Mr. Lanaghan believed the inbound trucks would be more semis and the outbound trucks
to be delivery vans, but he doesn’t have all of the information yet. Another representative
of IDI, Mr. Jeff Smith, explained that “FDC” shipments go directly to home sites,
whereas the “BDC” will be distributed to stores.
Alderman Beifuss stated that one of their concerns is that they want to develop the site
with some retail and a hotel, and they will need access to do that. He asked if they knew
the distance from Fabyan to Roosevelt for where the signal would be. The applicant
answered the minimum distance required is a quarter mile, which would satisfy IDOT.
Alderman Beifuss stated they would need to have a signalized intersection there in order
to get some retail frontage along Roosevelt Road, and he asked what their commitment is
to get one there sooner rather than later. Mr. Lanaghan replied that Home Depot’s
requirement is immediate, but they have been told that to get approval for a new signal on
Roosevelt, it would take 18 to 24 months. If they wait for that to happen first, Home
Depot would not be locating here, and most likely the rest of the development would not
happen either. He mentioned that they provided a letter to the members from Hamilton
Partners who outlined that for retail, you need infrastructure and some development there
first in order to make the property viable for more retail and a hotel. They are looking at
this as a phased project with IDI Logistics handling Phase One. They are willing to
participate with phases two and three as much as makes sense, but his company is an
expert in industrial. He confirmed that they do have the hotel lined up.
Development Committee Minutes
May 13, 2019
Page 4 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 6 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Alderman Beifuss asked how large of an area is needed for outside storage. Mr.
Lanaghan answered it is roughly 152,000 square feet located behind the building by the
rail for servicing. Alderman Beifuss asked about the number of acres they plan to
develop. Mr. Lanaghan responded there is a 14-acre parcel on the corner they have not
been able to make much headway with that owner about, which leaves about 70 acres
total.
Alderman Stout indicated that with the traffic studies that need to be done, the
commitment of the infrastructure, and the buffering and berms, and the distance from the
proposed hotel and retail, this a very positive venture. She asked the members for their
opinions.
Alderman Ferguson commented that he sees nothing but positives. After over 20 years
being undeveloped, he has seen it go from a sod farm to nothing.
Alderman Birch Ferguson stated that she agrees. She likes all of the elements and she
would give it the green light to move forward to the PC/ZBA with the concerns they have
outlined.
Alderman Sheahan agreed with that, and stated she likes the idea of it.
Alderman Beifuss stated he thinks it has some positive elements. He has concerns about
making sure that the signalization is tied in and that it would be part of any PUD. They
already have a lot of warehouse space in West Chicago—they just approved another
500,00 square feet—but this project helps them with this corner of the City. Mr.
Lanaghan stated that the timing of the two is completely different and he asked him how
he envisioned the two would be tied together. Alderman Beifuss responded that it would
be through the PUD. He wants to make certain that the City is not on the hook for a big
warehouse with no retail component if the signal does not go through. Mr. Lanaghan
pointed out that without the warehouse component, and the infrastructure and roadway
access it would provide, the retail will not arrive. However, he promised to do whatever
to make the PUD work. Tom Dabareiner stated that staff has some thoughts about how
they might make this work.
Alderman Stout concluded that the members want this to move forward and to work out
the details of a PUD.
6. Unfinished Business. None.
7. New Business.
Development Committee Minutes
May 13, 2019
Page 5 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 7 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
A. Election of Development Committee Chair and Vice-Chair.
Alderman Birch Ferguson moved to nominate Rebecca Stout as Committee Chair
and Alderman Beifuss seconded the motion. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Birch
Ferguson, Ferguson, Gagliardi, Garling, and Sheahan. Voting Nay: 0.
Alderman Stout noted that while she would normally nominate Alderman Beifuss for
Vice-Chair, it was brought to her attention that he is already the chair of another
committee.
Alderman Stout moved to nominate Alderman Birch Ferguson as Committee Vice-
Chair and Alderman Beifuss seconded the motion. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss,
Ferguson, Gagliardi, Garling, Sheahan and Stout. Voting Nay: 0.
8. Reports from Staff. None.
9. Adjournment.
Alderman Birch Ferguson moved and Alderman Ferguson seconded the motion to
adjourn the Development Committee meeting at 7:31 P.M. The Committee
members unanimously agreed and the motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Jane Burke
Development Committee Minutes
May 13, 2019
Page 6 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 8 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
_CITYOFWESTCHICAGO
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ITEM TITLE:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: ‘4.
Amendment to the Preliminary PUD for Lot 1 for the
Jigged Ventures Subdivision to permit the use “Motor FILE NUMBER:
Vehicle Sales, Internet based” within Unit 117 at 470
West Roosevelt Road. COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: July 8, 2019
COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
Ordinance #: 19-O-0026
STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE
APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE
ITEM SUMMARY:
The proposal seeks to amend the PUD to allow “Motor Vehicle Sales, Internet-Based” as a permitted
use at 470 West Roosevelt Road, Unit 117, within the Jigged Ventures Subdivision. As part of any
approval, no vehicles could be displayed, offered for sale, or stored outside of the building. All other
codes and requirements must be adhered to.
The location is zoned ORI, which, by exclusion, currently prohibits Internet-based motor vehicle sales.
The PUD amendment would allow the use in only one location within the Jigged Ventures Subdivi-
sion. If approved, the proposed tenant, Autosport, Inc., would move from Batavia and operate from
that location.
No site work is proposed. However, the petitioner proposes certain building modifications to create a
new office area in the front, and allow for the entry and storage of vehicles in a showroom. A building
permit is required for this work.
The Plan Commission/ZBA reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting held July 2, 2019 and
members recommended unanimously in favor by a vote of 6-0.
ACTION PROPOSED:
Recommendation to approve Ordinance #19-0-0026.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Pc: Draft Ordinance

===== PDF PAGE 9 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
ORDINANCE NO. 19-0-0026
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN
FOR LOT 1 OF THE JIGGED VENTURES SUBDIVISION
ROOSEVELT ROAD BETWEEN TOWN AND PEAR ROADS
WHEREAS, on or about May 21, 2019, Jim Beavers of Jigged Ventures, L.L.C. (the
"APPLICANT"), filed an application for an amendment to the preliminary PUD plan for Lot 1 of
the Jigged Ventures Subdivision with respect to the property legally described on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "SUBJECT REALTY"), commonly known as 470
West Roosevelt Road, Unit 117; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago (the “CITY”)
approved the preliminary PUD for Jigged Ventures Subdivision on October 20, 2003 according
to Ordinance 03-O-0072; and
WHEREAS, the CITY approved an amendment to the preliminary PUD for Jigged
Ventures Subdivision on August 16, 2004 according to Ordinance 04-O-0070; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing on the proposed amendment to the preliminary
PUD of the SUBJECT REALTY was published in the Daily Herald on or about June 17, 2019,
all as required by the ordinances of the CITY and the statutes of the State of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, all other notices required by law have been given; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of
Appeals of the CITY, commencing on July 2, 2019, pursuant to said Notice; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT provided testimony in support of its
application, and all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the CITY have received the recommendation of
the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals which contains specific findings of fact, pursuant
to Recommendation No. 2019-RC-0011, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" which
is, by this reference, incorporated herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West
Chicago, Du Page County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows:
Section 1. An amendment to the preliminary PUD plan for Lot 1 of the Jigged Ventures
Subdivision is hereby granted for the SUBJECT REALTY amending subject to the following
Conditions:
A. The SUBJECT REALTY shall be required to comply with all applicable conditions
of approval previously approved by Ordinance 03-O-0072 and Ordinance 04-0-0070
for the Jigged Ventures Subdivision Planned Unit Development.

===== PDF PAGE 10 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
B. The Permitted and Prohibited Use List of Jigged Ventures Subdivision, consisting of
three (3) pages, as a component of Exhibit “C” of Ordinance 04-O-0070 is hereby
amended to include the following permitted use:
24. Motor Vehicle Sales, Internet Based for Unit 117 of Lot 1 of Jigged Ventures
Subdivision
C. The approved amendment does not permit any site work or exterior modifications to
the building, other than a flush mounted sign on the building, to be performed on Lot
1.
D. Any proposed flush mounted signage on the building shall require a sign permit
subject to review and approval by City staff. _
E. No vehicles may be displayed, offered for sale, or stored outside of the building.
F. No display or signage may be installed on the property or on the exterior of the
building, other than a flush mounted sign identifying the name of the business, which
indicates the sale of vehicles.
Section 2. That the recommendation and findings of fact of the Plan Commission/Zoning
Board of Appeals previously incorporated herein as Exhibit “B” be and the same are hereby
adopted as the findings of fact of the City Council.
Section 3. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, shall, to the extent not
expressly modified by the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, remain in full force and effect
as therein provided.
Section 4. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days from and
after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
PASSED this day of 2019.
Alderman Beifuss _ Alderman Chassee |
Alderman Sheahan ee Alderman Brown ee
Alderman Hallett _ Alderman Ferguson |
Alderman Birch-Ferguson | Alderman Dimas _
Alderman Swiatek ee Alderman Garling |
Alderman Stout Alderman Short
Alderman Ligino-Kubinski Alderman Gagliardi

===== PDF PAGE 11 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
APPROVED as to form:
City Attorney
APPROVED THIS day of 2019.
Mayor Ruben Pineda
ATTEST:
City Clerk Nancy M. Smith
PUBLISHED:

===== PDF PAGE 12 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
EXHIBIT “A”
Subject Realty Legal Description
JIGGED VENTURES: UNIT NUMBER 117 IN 470 ROOSEVELT ROAD CONDOMINIUMS, AS
DELINEATED ON A PLAT OF SURVEY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND:
LOT 1 IN JIGGED VENTURES SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT 16,
TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN DUPAGE
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO.
2005-070407 ON APRIL 6, 2005 IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, WHICH PLAT OF SURVEY IS
ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT “A” TO THE DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM RECORDED
NOVEMBER 29, 2005 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER R2005-264471 AND RE-RECORDED
FEBRUARY 8, 2006 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER R2006-024155; TOGETHER WITH ITS
UNDIVIDED PERCENTAGE INTEREST IN THE COMMON ELEMENTS.
PIN. 04-16-203-002

===== PDF PAGE 13 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
TO:
EXHIBIT “B”
RECOMMENDATION NO. 2019-RC-0011
Honorable Mayor and City Council
SUBJECT: PC 19-12
Amendment to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan of Lots 1 of the Jigged
Ventures Subdivision
470 Roosevelt Road
DATE: July 2, 2019
DECISION: The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals (8-0 vote) recommended approval of the
request.
RECOMMENDATION:
After holding a public hearing and after review of the requested amendment to the preliminary PUD of
Lot
1 of the Jigged Ventures Subdivision, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals (PC/ZBA)
recommended approval, subject to the following conditions:
A.
99
The approved amendment does not permit any site work or exterior modifications to the
building, other than a flush mounted sign on the building, to be performed on Lot 1.
Any proposed flush mounted signage on the building shall require a sign permit subject to
review and approval by City staff.
No vehicles may be displayed, offered for sale, or stored outside of the building.
No display or signage may be installed on the property or on the exterior of the building,
other than a flush mounted sign identifying the name of the business, which indicates the sale
of vehicles.
The recommendation is based on the following findings of fact:
Lb
In what respects the proposed plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the stated
purpose and intent of the PUD regulations:
The City’s Comprehensive Plan contemplates ORI for this area and the intent of the
regulations established as part of the originally approved PUD were to be low intensity
service and office use. Internet based motor vehicle sales are unique and a relatively new
concept that may not have been contemplated as a permitted use in the planned unit
development at the time the development was proposed and approved.

===== PDF PAGE 14 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
2. The extent to which the proposed plan meets the requirements and standards of the PUD
regulations:
City staff has reviewed the proposed amendment, plans and documents for the proposal
and determined that it adequately addresses the standards. A building permit will be
required prior to any interior modifications occurring.
3. The extent to which the proposed plan departs from the zoning and subdivision regulations
otherwise applicable to the subject property including, but not limited to, the density,
dimension, area, bulk and use and the reasons why such departures are deemed to be in the
public interest:
No zoning deviations are proposed to accommodate the proposed use.
4. The method by which the proposed plan makes adequate provision for public services,
provides adequate control over vehicular traffic, provides for and protects designated common
open space and furthers amenities of light and air, recreation and visual enjoyment:
With only four (4) employees, the proposed use will have a limited demand for parking
on the site. Very little traffic from patrons is anticipated other than those picking up
vehicles that have been purchased online. The previous use as a furniture showroom and
store would have had a greater demand for parking given that sales were driven
primarily at the site rather than online.
5. The relationship and compatibility of the proposed plan to the adjacent properties and
neighborhood:
No modifications to the site or the exterior of the building are proposed. No vehicles will
be stored outside of the building and no displays or advertising are proposed. In fact, the
Zoning Code specifically prohibits vehicles from being stored or displayed for sale
outside for internet based auto sales. The proposed use will be compatible with the
existing service/office uses on the site. The amendment will allow only the subject tenant
space, Unit 117 of Lot 1, to have an internet based motor vehicle sales to prevent the
same use from locating elsewhere in the building or in the entire development.
6. The desirability of the proposed plan as regards physical development, tax base and economic
well-being of the City:
The proposed amendment is to accommodate a commercial use that will have a very
limited impact on public services and will not have a detrimental effect on the
surrounding area.

===== PDF PAGE 15 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Laimins
Chairperson
VOTE:
For Against Abstain Absent
Hale Devitt
Kasprak
Faught
Henkin
Dettman
Laimins

===== PDF PAGE 16 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
CITY OF WEST CHICAGO
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ITEM TITLE:
AGENDAITEMNUMBER: __ 2-4.
Amendments to the Preliminary PUD for Lots 2-4 and
Final PUD for Lots 1-3 for the Jigged Ventures Subdivi- | FILE NUMBER:
sion for Contractor Equipment Sales and Increased Al-
lowed Storage, respectively. COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: July 8, 2019
Ordinance #: 19-O-0025 COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE
APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE
ITEM SUMMARY:
Representatives from Jigged Ventures appeared before the Development Committee on November
13, 2018 to review this concept. They were seeking possible amendments to the PUD to modify the
permitted use list and certain build-out requirements (e.g., setbacks and building design) for the 560
W. Roosevelt and 600 W. Roosevelt lots. At that time, there was consensus among Development
Committee members to support the proposal, as presented. However, a request to delay some of the
landscaping installation was not discussed at that meeting and is reviewed below.
The proposal seeks to amend the PUD to allow redevelopment of Lot 1 (at 600 W. Roosevelt) with an
11,885 square foot contractor's equipment sales and leasing building and a warehouse. This change
would allow Atlas Bobcat to relocate from its current location at 490 Topsoil Drive and benefit from
exposure along a major highway. The proposal would also allow Lot 2 (at 560 W. Roosevelt) to con-
tain a 16,045 square foot warehouse/office building. Groebner & Associates would relocate there from
their current location at 450 Fenton Lane, which affords more room for growth and better highway ex-
posure.
To accomplish this, the PUD amendment would add two new permitted uses. First, it would add “Con-
tractor’s Equipment Sales and Leasing with Outside Ancillary Storage” for Lot 1. It also would add
“Outside Ancillary Storage to a Permitted Use” for Lot 2. The amendment would accomplish other
things, as well:
1. Increase the allowable warehouse floor area from 67% to 80%, which is seen as a concession
to the current marketplace.
2. Modify the building design somewhat by reducing the required window space while increasing
the amount of brick.
3. Grant deviations to reduce the required 20 foot setback along Roosevelt Road to 10.4 feet to
allow construction of three concrete pads for the display of Atlas Bobcat equipment.
4. Reduce the required 10 foot setback for a freestanding sign along Roosevelt Road to three feet
for Lot 1 and to one foot for Lot 2.
At the Plan Commission/ZBA meeting on July 2, 2019, a new request came from the petitioner to de-
lay installation of landscaping on Lot 2. The PUD currently requires installation of the landscaping on
both Lots 1 and 2 prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for Lot 1, regardless of the construc-

===== PDF PAGE 17 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
tion or occupancy status of Lot 2. The intent is to provide an attractive and uniform appearance from
Roosevelt Road. By delaying the installation of landscaping on Lot 2, without any guarantee that a
business will actually move forward to build and occupy Lot 2, these appearance goals are not met.
Staff recommends retaining the current language regarding landscaping, as indicated in the attached
draft.
The Plan Commission/ZBA reviewed the proposed amendments and recommended unanimously in
favor by a vote of 6-0, including the change regarding landscaping. However staff remains concerned
with the landscaping requirement and believes the current language in the PUD better serves the
City’s goals for the properties.
ACTION PROPOSED:
Recommendation to approve Ordinance #19-O-0025.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Pc: Draft Ordinance #19-O-0025
Exterior Building Elevations
Final PUD
Final Landscape Plan

===== PDF PAGE 18 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
ORDINANCE NO. 19-0-0025
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE PRELIMINARY PUD
PLAN OF LOTS 2 THROUGH 4 OF THE JIGGED VENTURES SUBDIVISION AND
APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE FINAL PUD FOR LOTS 1 THROUGH 3
IN THE JIGGED VENTURES RESUBDIVISION
ROOSEVELT ROAD BETWEEN TOWN AND PEAR ROADS
WHEREAS, on or about February 28, 2019, Jim Beavers of Jigged Ventures, L.L.C. (the
"APPLICANT"), filed an application for a fourth amendment to the preliminary PUD plan for
Lots 2, 3, and 4 of Jigged Ventures Subdivision and a second amendment to the final PUD for
Lots 1, 2, and 3 in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision, with respect to the property legally
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "SUBJECT REALTY");
and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago (the “CITY”)
approved the preliminary PUD for Jigged Ventures Subdivision on October 20, 2003 according
to Ordinance 03-O-0072; and
WHEREAS, the CITY approved a first amendment to the preliminary PUD for Jigged
Ventures Subdivision on August 16, 2004 according to Ordinance 2004-O-0070; and
WHEREAS, the CITY approved a second amendment to the preliminary PUD for Jigged
Ventures Subdivision on January 21, 2008 according to Ordinance 2008-O-0002; and
WHEREAS, the CITY approved a third amendment to the preliminary PUD for Jigged
Ventures Subdivision and a first amendment to the final PUD for Lots 1, 2, and 3 in the Jigged
Ventures Resubdivision on September 21, 2015 according to Ordinance 2015-O-0034; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing on proposed fourth amendment to the preliminary
PUD and second amendment to the final PUD of the SUBJECT REALTY was published in the
Daily Herald on or about June 17, 2019, all as required by the ordinances of the CITY and the
statutes of the State of Illinois; and,
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of
Appeals of the CITY, commencing on July 2, 2019, pursuant to said Notice; and,
- WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing, the APPLICANT provided testimony in suppott of its
application, and all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and,
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the CITY have received the recommendation of
the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals which contains specific findings of fact, pursuant
to Recommendation No. 2019-RC-0010, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" which
is, by this reference, incorporated herein.

===== PDF PAGE 19 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West
Chicago, Du Page County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows:
Section 1. That this Ordinance shall constitute approval of the following documents with
respect to the SUBJECT REALTY, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit "C", which
are, by this reference, incorporated herein and consisting of:
1. The Final Plat of Jigged Ventures Resubdivision prepared by SEC Group, Inc., dated
April 27, 2007 with a final revision date of November 27, 2007, consisting of two (2)
sheets.
2. The Final PUD Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated February 20, 2019 with a final
revision date of May 16, 2019 consisting of one (1) sheet.
3. The Final Landscape Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated February 20, 2019 with a
final revision date of June 7, 2019 consisting of four (4) sheets.
4. The Exterior Building Elevation Plans prepared by M.J. Root Architect, dated June 14,
2019 consisting of two (2) sheets.
5. Phasing Schedule of Jigged Ventures Resubdivision, consisting of one (1) page.
6. Permitted and Prohibited Use List of Jigged Ventures Subdivision consisting of three (3)
sheets.
Section 2. That the documents referenced in Section 1 above shall supersede in all
respects the documents approved in Section 1 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002, and amended in
Section 1 of Ordinance 2015-O-0034, only for Lots 2, 3, and 4 of the original Jigged Ventures
Subdivision.
Section 3. All construction, use, operation, and maintenance of the SUBJECT REALTY
shall be in substantial conformance with the documents listed above in Section 1 of this
Ordinance, in addition to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 8 of this Ordinance.
Section 4. That the following deviations from the requirements of the City’s Subdivision
Code of Ordinances previously approved by Ordinance Nos. 2003-O-0072, 2004-O-0070, and
: -2008-0-0002-are-hereby-reaffirmed and approved-with respect to the SUBJECT REALTY: -
1. From Section 9.3-4(B), so as to not provide public sidewalks.
2. From Section 9.3-8, so as to increase the maximum grading of a slope from 4:1 to 3:1.
3. From Section 10.2-5, Table 1, so as to reduce the width of a minor right-of-way from
sixty-six (66) feet to thirty-eight (38) feet.

===== PDF PAGE 20 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
4. From Section 10.2-10(B), so as to reduce the diameter of the cul-de-sac bulb from one
hundred twenty (120) feet to one hundred three (103) feet.
5. From Section 15-5, so as to not plant the parkway trees with the required right-of-way,
but instead within the required landscape setbacks of the lots within the PUD.
6. From Section 14-44(5)(c), so as to increase the maximum depth of the stormwater storage
within the detention basin from four (4) feet to four and thirty-eight hundredths (4.38)
feet and the maximum slope from 10:1 to 4:1.
Section 5. That the following new deviations from the requirements of the CITY’s
Zoning Code of Ordinances are hereby granted with respect to the SUBJECT REALTY:
1. From Section 11.3-2(C)(1), so as to reduce the corner side landscape yard along
Roosevelt Road for Lots 1 and 2 in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision from twenty (20)
feet to ten and fourth tenths (10.4) feet.
2. From Section 12.7-3, so as to reduce setback the for a freestanding sign along Roosevelt
Road on Lot 1 from five (5) feet to three (3) feet and on Lot 2 from five (5) feet to one
(1) foot.
3. From Section 14.8(B), so as to reduce the required landscape points along the south lot
line of Lot 1 from 512 points to 500 points.
3. From Section 11.3-4(M), so as to increase the buildings’ maximum warehousing floor
area ancillary to a permitted use from sixty-seven (67) percent to eighty (80) percent.
Section 6. That the following deviations from the requirements of the CITY’S Zoning
Code of Ordinances previously approved by Ordinance Nos. 2003-O-0072, 2004-O-0070, and
2008-O-0002 are hereby reaffirmed and approved with respect to the SUBJECT Realty:
1. From Section 14.6, so as to increase the maximum slope of berms from 4:1 to 3:1.
2. From Section 15.3 to allow the APPLICANT to construct the final PUD according to the
phasing schedule approved by the CITY.
3.... From, Sections. 6.12. and 11.2-2(C)(1),. so.as to reduce the front yard landscape setback.
along Topsoil Drive for Lot 4 in the original Jigged Ventures Subdivision from twenty
(20) feet to seventeen and seven tenths (17.7) feet.
4. From Sections 6.12 and 11.3-2(C)(1), so as to reduce the front landscape yard along the
Topsoil Drive cul-de-sac bulb for Lot 1 in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision from
twenty (20) feet to seven and forty-nine hundredths (7.49) feet.

===== PDF PAGE 21 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
5. From Sections 6.12 and 11.3-2(C)(1), so as to reduce the front landscape yard along
Topsoil Drive for Lot 2 in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision from twenty (20) feet to
nine (9) feet.
6. From Sections 6.12 and 11.3-2(C)(2), so as to reduce the corner side landscape yard
along Kress Creek Drive for Lot 2 in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision from twenty (20)
feet to thirteen and nine tenths (13.9) feet.
7. From Section 11.3-2(C)(3), so as to eliminate the east side landscape yard for Lot 1 an
the west side landscape yard for Lot 2 in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision.
Section 7. That the deviation from the requirements of Section 11.3-4(M) of the CITY’s
Zoning Code of Ordinances, so as to increase the buildings’ maximum warehousing floor area
ancillary to a permitted use from fifty (50) percent to sixty-seven (67) percent previously
approved by Ordinance 2008-O-0002, is hereby deleted in its entirety as it is no longer
applicable to the SUBJECT REALTY.
Section 8. That a fourth amendment to a Preliminary PUD for Lots 2 through 4 of the
Jigged Ventures Subdivision and a second amendment to a Final PUD for 1 through 3 of the
Jigged Ventures Resubdivision are hereby granted subject to the following conditions, which are
hereby approved with respect to the SUBJECT REALTY:
1. Condition 1 in Section 9 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002 shall be deleted in its entirety and
instead, the applicant shall adhere to the amended phasing schedule as presented in the
Phasing Schedule of Jigged Ventures Resubdivision, incorporated herein as a component
of Exhibit “C”.
2. Conditions 2 — 5 in Section 9 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002 shall remain in full force and
effect.
3. Condition 6 in Section 9 of Ordinance 2008-O0-0002 shall be deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:
a. The buildings to be constructed on Lots 1 and 2 shall contain the following:
i. A minimum of 14% glass and 86% masonry on their north facades.
ii. The east and west facades of the building on Lot 1 contain a minimum 54%
masonry.
ili. The east fagade of the building on Lot 2 contain a minimum of 3% glass and 66%
iv. The west fagade of the building on Lot 2 contain a minimum 56% masonry.
4. Conditions 7 and 8 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002 shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 9. That the recommendation and findings of fact of the Plan Commission/Zoning
Board of Appeals previously incorporated herein as Exhibit “B” be and the same are hereby
adopted as the findings of fact of the City Council.

===== PDF PAGE 22 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Section 10. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, shall, to the extent not
expressly modified by the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, remain in full force and effect
as therein provided.
Section 11. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days from and
after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
PASSED this day of 2019.
Alderman Beifuss ee Alderman Chassee |
Alderman Sheahan _ Alderman Brown a
Alderman Hallett _ Alderman Ferguson |
Alderman Birch-Ferguson Alderman Dimas ee
Alderman Swiatek ee Alderman Garling —
Alderman Stout ee Alderman Short ae
Alderman Ligino-Kubinski | Alderman Gagliardi
APPROVED as to form:
City Attorney
APPROVED THIS day of 2019.
Mayor Ruben Pineda
ATTEST: —_
City Clerk Nancy M. Smith
PUBLISHED:

===== PDF PAGE 23 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
EXHIBIT “A”
Subject Realty Legal Description
LOTS 1, 2, AND 3 IN JIGGED VENTURES RESUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART
OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 39 NORTH, RANGE 9 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 28, 2009 AS
DOCUMENT R2009-134445, IN DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
P.I.N.s 04-16-103-013, 04-16-103-014, and 04-16-103-015

===== PDF PAGE 24 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
EXHIBIT “B”
RECOMMENDATION NO. 2019-RC-0010
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
SUBJECT: PC 19-10
Fourth Amendment to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan of Lots 2 through
4 of the Jigged Ventures Subdivision and Second to the Final Planned Unit Development
Plan of Lots 1 through 3 in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision
Roosevelt Road between Town and Pearl Roads
DATE: July 2, 2019
DECISION: The Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals (8-0 vote) recommended approval of the
request.
RECOMMENDATION:
After holding a public hearing and after review of the requested amendment to the preliminary PUD of
Lots 2 through 4 of the Jigged Ventures Subdivision and to the Final PUD Plan for Lots 1 through 3 in the
Jigged Ventures Resubdivision, the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals (PC/ZBA) recommended
approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed in substantial compliance with the following plans:
a. The Final PUD Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated February 20, 2019 with a final
revision date of May 16, 2019 consisting of one (1) sheet, attached as Exhibit “E”.
b. The Final Landscape Plan prepared by HR Green, Inc. dated February 20, 2019 with
a final revision date of June 7, 2019 consisting of four (4) sheets, attached as Exhibit
oR?
c. The Exterior Building Elevation Plans prepared by M.J. Root Architect, dated June
14, 2019 consisting of two (2) sheets, attached as Exhibit “G”.
2. The uses permitted in the Jigged Ventures Resubdivision shall be limited to those listed
as permitted in the amended Permitted and Prohibited Use List of the Jigged Ventures
Resubdivision, attached as Exhibit “H”. wo
3. Condition 1 in Section 9 of Ordinance 2008-O0-0002 shall be deleted in its entirety and
instead, the applicant shall adhere to the amended phasing schedule as presented in the
Phasing Schedule of Jigged Ventures Resubdivision, incorporated herein as a component
of Exhibit “C”.
4. Conditions 2, 3, and 5 in Section 9 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002 shall remain in full force
and effect.

===== PDF PAGE 25 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
5. Condition 4 in Section 9 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002 shall be deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:
The landscaping proposed along Roosevelt Road on Lot 1 and along the west lot
line of Lot 1 shall be installed before final occupancy is granted for Lot 1 and the
landscaping proposed along Roosevelt Road on Lot 2 shall be installed before
final occupancy is granted for Lot 2.
6. Condition 6 in Section 9 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002 shall be deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:
a. The buildings to be constructed on Lots 1 and 2 shall contain the following:
i. A minimum of 14% glass and 86% masonry on their north facades.
ii. The east and west facades of the building on Lot 1 contain a minimum 54%
masonry.
iii. The east facade of the building on Lot 2 contain a minimum of 3% glass and
66% masonry.
iv. The west facade of the building on Lot 2 contain a minimum 56% masonry.
7. Conditions 7 and 8 of Ordinance 2008-O-0002 shall remain in full force and effect.
The recommendation is based on the following findings of fact:
1. In what respects the proposed plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the stated
purpose and intent of the PUD regulations:
The proposed plan is designed to be compatible with the City’s Comprehensive Plan
which contemplates ORI for this area and the intent of the regulations established as
part of the originally approved PUD and this proposed PUD amendment. The
amendment to the uses permitted for Lots 1 and 2 are consistent with the uses in the
overall PUD.
The extent to which the proposed plan meets the requirements and standards of the PUD
regulations:
The petitioner has provided documentation indicating the proposed plan meets all of the
necessary requirements and standards of the PUD regulations as defined in Section 15 of
the West Chicago Zoning Ordinance. City staff has reviewed the plans and documents
for the proposal and determined that it adequately addresses the standards.
The extent to which the proposed plan departs from the zoning and subdivision regulations
otherwise applicable to the subject property including, but not limited to, the density,
dimension, area, bulk and use and the reasons why such departures are deemed to be in the
public interest:
Several zoning deviations were previously requested and approved from the zoning
regulations. A limited number of zoning deviations are currently being requested in
order to allow better exposure for the businesses to be located on Lots 1 and 2.

===== PDF PAGE 26 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
4. The method by which the proposed plan makes adequate provision for public services,
provides adequate control over vehicular traffic, provides for and protects designated common
open space and furthers amenities of light and air, recreation and visual enjoyment:
The proposed plan addresses shared vehicular use areas, will be served with a previously
approved regional detention facility, and will provide adequate visual screens where
necessary.
5. The relationship and compatibility of the proposed plan to the adjacent properties and
neighborhood:
The proposed plan provides for harmonious uses that will blend well with the existing
adjacent uses.
6. The desirability of the proposed plan as regards physical development, tax base and economic
well-being of the City:
The proposed plan is designed to accommodate commercial and light industrial users
on-site and promote the positive development of the subject property.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Laimins
Chairperson
VOTE:
= For . Against=-= ~~ Abstain oe AS emt
Hale Devitt
Kasprak
Faught
Henkin
Dettman
Laimins

===== PDF PAGE 27 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
EXHIBIT "G"
y ®
Rout (ir oF 6) YT wisy a. 120-8" aa (OF ROOF BcvOHO on
I
Il
Il
ont cuevanon emEROR s7 3183 5 UVADOR ExTEROR SF: 2.01
ee ee OST ses Ges)
NORTH ELEVATION f ‘aAmne @: “sto (i EAST ELEVATION “que 31 eG
Tete
T/ MASY 1261 f=OUT (TP OF 8) UNE OF ROOF 8x
wis CUT sto:
soup =
s:
SOUTH ELEVATION mages 9 8 OS
ee
ET
fell | |
4/35/2019
HANORAI TAll
NO SCALE
NEW BUILDING FOR
JIGGED VENTURES #3 LOT 1
—_IL RT 38 ROSEVELT RD _WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
m.j.root + architect
‘SPACE BDIEATH STAR WAESS THAN 80"
[AMET TO PASS. PREVENT VISUALLY IMPARED PERSCH
AND RAILING REQUIREMENTS DIAGRAM ‘PROVOE OCTECTABLE WARRING AT TOP OF STAR.
324 cevtero,_ trankfort, als 60623 215640777

===== PDF PAGE 28 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
OLAING $F. 575 (4)
‘STONE SLOPE TOP
a
IBA" CUT STONE
a
q
WEST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
pa | pe
‘SOITH ELEVATION EXTERIOR SF, 9.434
MASONRY $F 1313 (408)
AINO SF, 102 (28)
TOTAL EXTERIOR $F, 12340
MASONRY SF 7103 (698)
LATINO SF. “1008 (OR)
NEW BUILDING FOR
JIGGED VENTURES #4 LOT 2
——JLRT36ROSEVELTRD WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS|
m.j.root - architect
324 center, traniton, @neis 60423
235.066.0277

===== PDF PAGE 29 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Sr
=
—
Sm
S
=P
>t.
a
Sl2e
oF
PROP, MOHUMENT
——
a
=>.
—
=~
~ TS
Sse
EXHIBIT "E"
SIGN (2°x10')
es
=~
4
I
ase
ms
~.
>t
=~
=~
Ss2
oe
ate
7s
DENOTES STANDARD PAVEMENT
~~
=2
os
Ss.
i
ss
Soe,
~~
~e
ee
——
=>.
——
——
mst
DENOTES P.C.C. SIDEWALK
Son
S2-
——
—
=>.
a
===
——
FESSSsSeeees]omNoTES DETECTABLE WARNING
ss
SSS22
=|
Sass
AREA (10°%)
CONCRETE DISPLAY
ss.
os
===
DENOTES STANDARD CURB &
——
AREA (10°X15')
~
“ 38 (po
OS;
SSSn-.
=
Sis
10.0"
==
=2
—
FS777 T= denores REVERSE CURD & CUTTER
R=1950.59"
~
~~
ELT p
a
a
a
425.40"
sek
O4D) ~~
==s,.
——
=:
——
SE=EESSESF=== DENOTES DEPRESSED CURB &
GUTTER (LENGTH NOTED ON SITE
fel
43.0)
-f
CBaS7426'HE
~.
ae
~~
PUAN)
m424.45"
WSS Sn
me
iL 38 ROW
ee
. EXTERIOR
ms. L
-S
ANNOTATION ABBREVIATIONS;
CONCRETE. DISPLAY
foo
~~~
7.
L904
RS.0"
AREA (10°K15')
= BUILDING SETBACK LINE
49.5 |
20.0" UE & DE PER DOC.
ee a ee
ss L
~~
PSL = PARKING SETBACK LINE
= WATERMAN EASEMENT
NO. R2005-070407
~~
+.
I 38 ROW
UE = UTIUTY EASEMENT
20.0"
88:
PROP, MONUMENT
~=
7s L
—
DE = DRAINAGE EASEMENT
WE
SIGN (2°x8")
we
ROW = RIGHT-OF-WAY
R10"
9.0°
L02.7°
SOFMAEA = STORMWATER DETENTION FACILITY
eR
| muse,
n
PROP, ADA
MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT AREA
Biss
SIGN (TYP.)
Li
vel
t
PROP. HANDICAPPED
p+
ei
SPACES PER ADA
9.0" PROP, LANDSCAPE
REQUIREMENTS (TYP.)
a ae
|
AREA
entboo] \
=~
a
| pss.
5.0"
Aa
S
17.5)
SIGNAGE EASEMENT PER
aN
IN
86.65
RS.0
RS!
83
y
00C. NO, R2005-070407
NY
be
_—
of
188.07
S87
R=44.00"
58.3"
60.0°
10.5°
=
"
06'27"%
L=23.20°
Sno.
1859.1
82 05
109. 28°
AN
(CB=H0679'07°W
Key
|.10.0'L 10.
82.0"
Ny
C=22.94"
Sat
Psi" Pst.
Bast, sich
= *
2,400 SF OFFICE AREA
cea
9.9"
boo
\ _—
wl
4.0'
14
Ki
ES
0.2"
(TO REMAIN)
4,985
he
t+
|_25.0°_|
Has StS
74.8"
=k
d wounreo
ta
5.0!
5.0"
Et
Hi
SIGN (TYP.)
PROP. EXTER!
oN
R450"
Hy
PROP, aa
DISPLAY AREA
1
Ye
Ss
if
P|
13.0"
st
Ht
LANDSCAPE 95
Zh
Hy
5.0°
1.4
ge
297.6"
fit
nd
28.3"
6.0"
RS.5
'
83
5.0"
19.0"
10.5
"
|
HI
Ren
t-
4
5.0"
N oy
Sx
by
38
Lo
TINS
ga
Se
15.0"
7,500 SF WAREHOUSE AREA
|
H}
3°.
(SEE_ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
R50}
¥
28
FOR EXACT BUILDING
on
1t_}._5.0"}
13.0°]
109%
DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT
R49.0°
23
25.0"
DETAILS)
19.0
=
it
gm
ae
PROP. .6'x6" CONCRETE
WW
TRANSFORMER PAD
Hi]
"
S
-—~
9'x14" OVERHEAD
68.8"
Hi
MW
LAT |
J-— PROP. FIRE-LOCK
PROP. 14'x16"
OVERHEAD DOORS:
Rd
HT
Box
aft
13.0"
176.0"
f
W
125.0"
To
I{
10.0"
oll
| fo}
31.8"
15.0°_| 5.01
16,045 SF BUILDING
4+
"i
oe,
BSL
A
2
(SEE_ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
0.0°
!
Wy
DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT
FOR EXACT BUILDING
il
"
216.0",
2
LOT 2
ws
+—
i
109.00°
10.0"
prop. wooo Baa
DETAILS)
nH
La38.30"
FENCE CATE (SINGLE
lL LH ]-to0" ve g
66,190 SF
!
CB=S0432'13'W
HANG, INWARD SWING)
it
(Cm38.36"
(1.52 ACRES)
Sl 24.0"
ny
PROP. WOOD B&B FENCE
©
i!
nf
(CONNECT WITH FENCE
12'n14" OVERHEAD
|xTeRIOR ——~|
ON RETAINING WALL)
DOORS.
tle
B&B’ FENCE
PROP. STORAGE AREA
11%
IN
PROPOSED LOT 1
0,008 SF. (
a)
24/0"
WITH MASONRY WALLS,
bo],
me
19.
JQ MATCH BUILDING.
156.0"
ne.
In
11,885 SF.
400 GFA'= 20%
PAR = 0.15
| \ence: nase
LOT 1
ve
9.485 CFA — box
ENCLOSURE WITH
ut
MASONRY BLOCK WALLS:
80,908 SF
Wt
1 a
ve
=I
R12.5°
30.0"
[Ved
4 SPACES/1,000 GFA (OFMICE) = 10 SPACES
1 SPACE/1,000 GFA (WAREHOUSE) = 10 SPACES
dds
BSL
ust
20 SPACES REQURED
(1.86 ACRES) i
40}
90.0}
nso
21 SPACES PROVOCD
'
15.0’ PU_& DE PER DOC.,
20.0" UE & DE PER ooc._|
N&
NO. R2005-070407
Tae
wt
NO. R2005-070407
WIN
TOTAL PARKING STALLS ON LOT 1 = 1 ADA 20 TYPICAL
HS
BUILDING COVERAGE
11,885 SF. (27.204 AC) — 14.2%
i
FENCE GATES
BAB FOKE
es)
PAVEMENT COVERAGE
49,037 SF. (
138 AC) =
7
1
1]
— p+
(DOUBLE HANG,
15.0"
LANDSCAPE AND OPEN SPACE
19,386 SF. (0.445 AC) — 230%
| enor. retanine watt
OUTWARD SWING)
Whe
MAX, BLOG. HOGHT
30 FT.
(SEE ARCH. PLANS)
R35
11.7"
a
tt
‘Dusminc ZonNe
ft =" OY OF WEST G¥CACO
\t
PROPOSED ZONING
OF = CITY OF WEST GHCAGO
PROP. WOOD B&B
25.5
SF
PROP. CONCRETE
i!
oy
FENCE GATE
‘APRON
nn
(DOUBLE HANG,
VX
PROPOSED LOT 2
66,190 SF. (1.52 AC)
INWARD SWING)
PROP, DEPRESSED
MEDIAN
yt
Ae
PROP. 8°x6"
Oe
nt
FLOOR AREA
16,065 SF, - FAR = 0.26
R5.0',
RS.0
CONCRETE
5.400 GFA'= 34x
10,6465 GFA — 66x
TRANSFORMER
yp /
PAD
R125"
Sot eee ee See)
49.0"
10.0°
R=51.50°
Re=51.50"
PROP. 10°x18"
"R7.0"
Li
4 SPACES/1,000 GFA (OFMCE) = 22 SPACES
PSL
30.0"
L=74.30°
Las9.18°
75°
1 SPACE/1,000 GFA (WAREHOUSE) = 11 SPACES
‘33 SPACES REQUIRED
fe
BSL
CB=S3830'53-W — CB=NOTDS'10W
CORRAL PAD
13.5°
38 SPACES PROVIO#D
138.9"
20.0" VE
C=68.02"
=85.97"
Oy on
25.5)
& DE
38 gk
31.9
TOTAL PARKING STALLS ON LOT 2 = 2 ADA, 36 TYPICAL
ea
16,045 SF. (0.368 AC,
- 2428
ce
Te
<
R=45.00"
Ln43.50°
7.0
===
Re44.00"
PAVEMENT COVERAGE
32,100 SF, (0.738 AC.
- 407%
1.50"
20.0" UE & DE PER 00C,|
51.6"
260,12"
UNDSCAPE ANO OPEN SPACE
17,965 SF. (0.412 Ac;
= 7745
es
L=27.07"
CB=S6151'30E
NO. R2005-070407
S89°33'06['E 130.93"
CBON4520°43°E
£18
say
‘SBB3I 06
zy
(CBaS17°41'SS"E
Cm41.82"
c=62.23°
WAX. BLDG. HOCHT
30 FT.
Ont =" coy OF WEST CacAco
345°
=26,71'
PROPOSED ZONING
ORI = CiTY OF WEST CHICAGO
SOFMAEA
BUST. UCHT POLE
BAR IS ONE INCH ON
R=45.00°
(To REMAN)
UMITS OF PROP.
OPSOIL DRIVE
OFC. CRANNGS.
PROP. RETAINING WALL
La31.95"
PAVEMENT
MINMUM REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR Of} ZONING
0 as 1°
(PART OF PREVIOUS
PROP, WOOD B&D FENCE
CB=S7006'23°W
Da
301.
20 FI.
F NOT OLE INCH,
Ray
ENGINEER PLANS)
(cognect wii FENCE
Cm31.29°
don.
20 FT.
ADNIST SCALE ACCORDINGL
WSRETAINING WALL)
EXIST, RETAINING WALL
a
===
==2'
Pe
13
1s
10 FT.
10 Fr
(TO REMAIN)
Rea51.50°
a
foram Gy: ERD
©
PROP. WOOO B&B FENCE
La7.65"
a
APPROVED REDUCED LANDSCAPE SETBACKS:
approver: IME |
(CONNECT WITH FENCE
CB9S8126'44°C
NY
* REDUCED FRONT LANDSCAPE YARD ALDNG TOPSOR DRE CUL-DE-SAC
408 bare: 92-20-2019 |
ON RETAINING WALL)
{t
ca7745"
AN
a
“
BULB FOR LOT 1 FROM 20 FT, TO 7.49 FT.
PROP. WOOD FENCE
PAVEMENT
4
.
208 NO: 86150368.04_
GATE (SINGLE
aN
tt
———
FROM 20 FF. TO 8 FT.
LANDSCAPE YARD ALONG TOPSOR DRE FOR LOT 2
HANG, INWARD
fi
‘SwiNG)
Vv
"
© REDUCED CORNER SIDE LANDSCAPE YARD ALONG KRESS CREEX ORVE
W
"
FOR LOT 2 FROM 20FT. TO 139°.
‘|
It
MW
u
6.
EX—1
——
uw
W
© ELAINATE THE EAST SIDE _LANOSCAPE YARD FOR LOT 1 AND WEST SIDE
LANDSCAPE YARD FOR LOT 2.
am
= SSS == +
m=
=
it
—
T= 20°

===== PDF PAGE 30 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
TREE PROTECTION KEY
EXHIBIT "F"
©0ST. TREE TO BE PRESERVED
8-2
©sT, TREE TO BE REMOVED
ZONING
2
@ #
TRUNK PROTECTIVE FENCING
yt
4
7
rN
EX. HYDRANT (TYP.)
“
=
‘
rad
=
(
ee
!
CRIMCAL ROOT ZONE
Te.
‘3:1 SLOPE
. L 3g Rosey lr RO4p)
or)
TOTAL QUANTITIES (IN VIGINITY OF DISTURBANCE AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS)
~4
20° we!
ENST. TREES TO BE REMOVED
EnST, TREES TO BE PRESERVED
18
:
Orr lay
1UMENT SIGN
PSO, Mont
CONC.
CONERAL, NOTES
1
f
PAD!
0°
12 THE wTENT 1S TO KEEP THE
TO BE PRESERVED IN TACT
oie
GANG mers
ON-SITE. WF THE TREES ARE
*s, Ls,
QAMACED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSISLE FOR
xP
REPLACING PER THE MUNICIPALITY'S ORDINANCE.
t 20° we.
ga
~Jo
2, SOMTICTOR 15 RESPONSELE FOR THE HAKOFF OF ALL TREES TO BC
20° UE.
y
EX. UNLITY (TYP.)
1
& 0.
eT
¢
ors
eo
~.
fo>
eae
*
~J
>.
~ TREE TO EE PRESERVED (TYP.)
a
UX.
xf)
1 NOARy
EX. OVERHEAD {UTILITY (TYP.)
Py
eae
SS
=
jay
Rows
~s
(ne.)
20° WE.
xs
see
Az
GuY WIRE
sf
cary
=
uA
etNt
Ao,
oN]
~~
St
PF.
Ip
SSS
tye tenene
PR. HYDRANT (TYP.)
Pix
T
eof"
aN
=~.
| at 4d
PROP, MONUMENT SIGN
a
NLL?
eo X
ny
Fle
&
BO.
WAL ey
120" we,
&
te-
\\
~-
——
~ fee.
~-
N\A
83
ge
| PR. HYDRANT (TYP.)
es
~f
a
y
re
+—
Sw
-: “}
wah
4,
EX. SIGN TO REMAIN’,
a5
BS
fue
Ie
Nu
SIGNAGE EASENENT '
28
372
rel
20° WE.)
L
4
W
Ss =
gs
on
CRMCAL ROOT ZONE (TyP,) S \\
W
Fo
7
EX. TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.)
"
=S
3a
£3
=|
HW
|
ly
u
7,500 SF BUILDING
ut
MH
uy
cy
(SEE, ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)
"
‘
20° we,
oO!
ol!
ty
=)
4
am te.
mi
PR. HYDRANT
it
—— ha
(ve.)
!
LOTS 1 & 2 JIGGED VENTURES RESUBDIVISION - WEST CHIGAGO, RLINOIS
wane
February 20, 2019
i
TREE SURVEY.
1?
EX. LANDSCAPED BE0
Dan
16,045 SF _BULDING
TO BE REMOVED (TYP.)
TaGw
(INCHES)
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
CONDITION ACTION
\y
(SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS)
20
24"
19°=6"
‘Acer neguido
Boxelder
NUISANCE SPECIES
10° UE.
(TvP.)
12.0
Pyrvs coleryane
(Calery Pear
REMOVE
IN FUTURE PAVMENT
PR. EXTERIOR TRUCK DOCK
(ve.)
a5
‘Acer freemanit
Freeman Maple
REMOVE
DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
i" Oe.
(rp.)
80
Picea pungens var. glauca
‘Bive Colorado Spruce
PR. FENCE (TYP,)
ZONING
DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
te
t
9.0
Picea pungens var. glauca
Blve Colorado Spruce
PRESERVE
9.0
Picea pungens var. glauca
Bive Colorado Spruce
PRESERVE
7 T9499
110
Picea pungens ver. gleuce
Bive Colorado Spruce
REMOVE
20" WE.
yh
[DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE.
ve
_
RN
60
Picea pungens var. glauca
Bive Colorado Spruce
PRESERVE
80
‘Acer treemanii
Freeman Maple
DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
“eC
10
10.0
Picea pungens var. glauca
(Bive Colorado Spruce
DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
ww
~=
1"
80
i]
Picea pungens var. glauca
(Bive Colorado Spruce:
ca
[DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE.
+r
12
10.0
Picea glauca
‘White Spruce
i
REMOVE
[DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
PR. STORAGE AREA WITH
13'-9
3
9.0
‘Acer freeman
Freeman Maple
7
[DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE.
MASONRY WALLS TO MATCH
Ls.
1
65
Picea pungens var. glauca
‘Bive Colorado Spruce
7
PR. CONCRETE
PULDING
“4
[DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE.
15
8s
‘Acer remand
Freeman Maple
DISTURBANCE IN CRITICAL ROOT ZONE.
— 7
TRASH CORRAL
16
85
Prva cateryana
Callery Pear
REMOVE
IN FUTURE PAVMENT
i
7
85
(Acer freeman
Freeman Maple
PRESERVE
ab
—
18
’
enh
20° UE."
10.0
Franinus
‘Ash
[DEAD
re
mM
19
8.0
Fraxinus
Ash
DEAD
x!)
A
“
110
Pyrus caleryans
Callery Pear
REMOVE
I FUTURE PAVMENT
20" ue.
ta
a
2
645,757
Soa?
Wf
at
Pyrus calleryana
Callery Pear
is FUTURE PAVMENT
PR, HYDRANT (TYP.)
a Of
L~---- 30" BSL
FT
aa
\\
KEY:
PR.
---b------=
1
CONDITION:
— TRANSFORMER PAD. — — __
=>
‘A= Good
ew
20' P.S.L-
S=~
f=
ML--
#13
B-Fair
ve—— ur.
Ue.
u
ssl
<a
me. 9
pen
(CN) 20° WE
=A
(C= Poor
re
sy
& OE 1
‘D-Dead
S-4
BAR IS ONE INCH ON
OFRGAL GRAMNCS
0 to 1°
F NOT ORE wCH,
ADAIST SCALE ACCORDINGLY
TOPSOIL ORIVE
foRawN BY: NRS
APPROVED: MAE |
EX. UGHTPOLE wn
08 oat: 92420-2019
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN
{
jos no: 86t50368.04 |
Se
—
1° = 20'-0"
FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN knowwhat's below.
all before you dig,
<

===== PDF PAGE 31 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
seszszF
TOPSOIL DRIVE,
6 wutcn RNG (TP)
Gal
SES8T5TF
' FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN know what's below,
Call before you dig.
LoIs 1 & 2 ILUNOKS DESIGN FIRM
JIGGED VENTURES RESUBDIVISION >> eee
bemelineena- Sad aA Sire, SUE 100,
McHENY, 60050
LANDSCAPING %
LANDSCAPE PLAN HRGreen wont: 818.88.778
L-02

===== PDF PAGE 32 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
GENERAL NOTES
ZONING:
or
1, BASE MAP INFORMATION IS ACCURATE AS OF THE DATE PRINTED ON THIS PACKAGE,
LOTS 1 & 2 JIGGED VENTURES RESUBDIVISION - WEST CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
TOTAL SITE AREA:
3.38 AC,
NUMBER OF REGULAR PARKING STALLS: 37
147,098 SF,
‘June 6, 2019
NUMBER OF HANDICAP PARXONG STALLS: 3
2, THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CONTAINED HERDN RLUSTRATE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF ALL SITE CONOMONS. REFER TO SURVEY,
CIV ENGINEERING, STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, IRRIGATION AND ALL OTHER DRAWINGS, IF AVALABLE, FOR ADOTIONAL DETALED INFORMA
CTURAL,
MATERIALS SCHEDULE
TOTAL NUMBER OF STALLS:
60
ary
3.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSISLE FOR BECOMING AWARE OF ANO FIELD VERIFYING ALL RELATED EXSTING AND PROPOSED CONDMONS,
KEY
BOTANICAL NAME/ITEM
SIZE
‘COND
REMARKS
ORDINANCE LANOSCAPE REQUIREMENTS
UTILITIES, PIPES ANO STRUCTURES, ETC. PRIOR TO GIOOING AND CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELO RESPONSIBLE FOR
DECIOUOUS TREES
CONTACTING J.ULLLE., THE MUNICIPAL PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT, THE COUNTY ANO ANY OTHER PUBUC OR PRIVATE ACENGIES NECESSARY
LANDSCAPE YARDS:
FOR UTILITY LOCATION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTANVE OF APPARENT CONFLICTS
12
aC
‘AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS.
‘SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY
CHT.
Bae
MULTFSTEMMED, MATCHED:
THE APPUCANT SHALL PROVIDE A LANOSCAPE SCREEN/BUFFER FOR ALL LANOSCAPE YARDS AS
WITH CONSTRUCTION ANO UTILITIES SO THAT ADJUSTMENTS CAN BE PLANNED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS ARE NECESSARY
5
AM
‘ACER MIYABEI MORTON
STATE STREET MAPLE.
WOICATED IN THE REGULATIONS FOR EACH BUSINESS AND MANUFACTURING DISTRICT. SUCH BUFFER
QUE TO EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS THEY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE SOLE
+
a8
CENTRAL LEADER; MATCHED
WAY INCLUDE PLANT MATERIALS, FENCES, WALLS ANO BERMS, AND NUST PROMDE A CERTAN NUMBER
10
co
CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS
COMMON HACKBERRY.
=
BaB
CENTRAL LEADER; MATCHED
OF POINTS.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY AND ALL COSTS OR OTHER UABILTMES INCURRED DUE TO DAMACE OF SAID UTLITES/STRUCTURES/ETC.
19
Gr
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SITE CONOMONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT MILLFULLY PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION AS DESIGNED
‘GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS 'SKYCOLE”
‘SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST.
CAL
B28
CENTRAL LEADER; MATCHED
WORTH (LOT 1 &
WHEN IT IS APPARENT THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS ANO/OR GRADE DWFFERENCES EXIST THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN KNOWN DURING DESIGN.
4
Cy
QUERCUS ALBA X ROBUR ‘CRIMSON SPIRE"
CRIMSON SPIRE OAK
CAL
B88
CENTRAL LEADER: MATCHED
SMU XS = 20
POINTS
SUCH CONDMONS SHALL BE IMMEDUTELY BROUCHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR CLARIFICATION. THE CONTRACTOR
220UF (GERM) X 2.5' HT. = 950 / 2 = 275 PONTS
‘SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILTY FOR ALL LIMBILTIES, INCLUDING NECESSARY REVISIONS DUE TO FALURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATION,
3
‘OR
‘QUERCUS RUBRA
[RED OAK
CAL
BaB
CENTRAL LEADER: MATCHED
2,670 = 273 = 2,393 POINTS REQUIRED
[DECIOUOUS SHRUBS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR ANO PROCURE ALL REQUIRED PERMITS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.
‘soum:
10
HA
HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS ‘ANNABELLE
ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA
CONT,
¥0.C; MATCHED
tort:
205UF X 5 = 1,025 PONTS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY ITH ALL CODES APPLICABLE TO THIS WORK.
2
HL
HYDRANGEA PANICULATA LIMELIGHT
205F x 2.3
313 POINT DEDUCTION (8° FENCE)
LIMELIGHT HYDRANGEA,
CONT.
0.0; MATCHED:
030 = 515 = 512 POINTS REQUIRED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION SUBCONTRACTORS AND OTHER COMTRACTORS OF RELATED TRADES, AS
87
HP
HYDRANGEA PANICULATA LITTLE LIME,
HYDRANGEA PANICULATA ‘JANE
CONT.
3.0.0; MATCHED
REQUIRED, TO ACCOMPLISH THE PLANTING AND RELATED OPERATIONS.
21
ED
Lor 2:
21 KS =
075 POINTS REQUIRED
'SYRINGA BLOOMERANG PURPLE
SYRINGA X PENDA™
CONT.
0.0: MATCHED:
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIAL WITH THE INSTALLATION OF OTHER IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS
at
vo
VIGURNUM DENTATUM BLUE MUFFIN
\VIBURNUM DENTATUM ‘CHRISTOM
¥0.C., MATCHED:
HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS ANO RELATED STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILTY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
254UF XS = 1,270 PONTS REQUIRED
EVERGREEN SHRUBS
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO RESTORE ALL AREAS OF THE SITE, OR ADJACENT AREAS, WHERE DISTURBED BY OPERATIONS OF OR
7
6
LEX GLABRA "SHAMROCK"
INKBERRY
CONT.
west:
RELATED TO THE CONTRACTOR'S WORX.
40.0; MATCHED:
2h
376F XS = 1,880 PONTS
10.
128
ra
JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS KALLAY'S COMPACT:
KALLAY'S COMPACT JUNIPER
CONT.
30.0; MATCHED
321LF X 2.5 = 602.5 POINT DEDUCTION (8° FENCE)
‘ALL SURFACE DRAINAGE SHALL BE DIVERTED AWAY FROM STRUCTURES ANO NOTED SITE FEATURES IN ALL AREAS AT A MINIMUM OF 2% SLOPE
10
RH
RHOOODENORON PJM ELITE”
1,880 = 802.5 = 1,078 POINTS REQUIRED
AS SHOWN ON THE CML ENCINEERING PLANS. ALL AREAS SHALL POSITIVELY DRAIN AND ALL ISLANDS SHALL BE CROWNED 1” IN HOGHT PER
RHODOCENDRON
CONT.
30.0; MATCHED
1° IN ISLAND WOTH.
7
™
‘TAXUS X MEDIA DENSIFORMIS"
DENSEIFORMIS YEW
CONT.
30.0; MATCHED
NORTH (LOT 1 & 2)
n
73
‘SHADE TREES
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS NOTED ON THE FOLLOWING PLANS, AS WELL AS, TREE LOCATIONS ANO THE PERIMETER
TO
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS ‘SMARAGD
EMERALD GREEN ARBORVITAE
CONT.
‘40.0; MATCHED:
13. X 100 POINTS = 1,300
OF SHRUB/PERONNIAL BEDS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ANO CONTACT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL. FINAL LOCATION AND
PERENNIALS,
GRASSES & GROUNDCOVER
EVERGREEN TREES
‘3 (PRESERVED) X 60 = 180
STACQNG OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN ADVANCE OF INSTALLATION,
LOW SHRUGS
ORNAMENTAL TREES:
12X80 PONTS =
13
CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA KARL FOERSTER’
FEATHER REED GRASS
oo
Cont.
24° 0.C,; MATCHED
PERENNIALS,
44% 10 POINTS = 440
12.
WF CONFLICTS ARISE BETWEEN THE SIZE OF AREAS AND PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATVE
409
EUONYMUS FORTUNEI VAR. COLORATUS"
PURPLE WINTERCREEPER
27:1 PONT = 27
FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
‘24 CELL FLAT
CONT.
12 0.C.; MATCHED
13.
145
HEMEROCALLIS ‘STELLA DE ORO"
DAYLILY.
oO
CONT.
18° 0.C.; MATCHED
TOTAL: 2,547 POINTS (2.395 POINTS REQUIRED)
WHERE PROVIDED, AREA TAKEOFFS AND PLANT QUANTITY ESTIMATES IN THE PLANT LIST ARE FOR INFORMATION ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR IS
EJ
HOSTA FRANCEE™
SOUTH (LOT 1)
RESPONSIBLE TO DO THEIR OWN QUANTITY TAKE-OFFS FOR ALL PLANT MATERIALS ANO SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS. IN CASE OF ANY
HOSTA
oo
CONT,
2470.0; MATCHED.
SHADE TREES
‘3X 100 PONTS = 500
DISCREPANCIES, PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CALL-OUTS ANO/OR THE PLANT UST(S).
36
SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS
PRAIRIE DROPSEED
"1
CONT.
2470.6; MATCHED
14,
‘ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN PLANTS MEETING AMERICAN NURSERY AND LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION (ANLA) STANOARDS SET FORTH IN
24
TIARELLA ELIZABETH OLIVER’
FOAMFLOWER.
oo
CONT,
18° 0.C.; MATCHED
TOTAL: SOO POWTS (S12 POINTS REQUIRED)
THE "AMERICAN STANOARO FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANS! Z60.1-LATEST EDITION). PLANTS ARE TO BE TYPICAL IN SHAPE AND SIZE FOR SPECIES,
MISCELLANEOUS
SOUTH (LOT 2)
PLANTS PLANTED IM ROWS OR GROUPS SHALL BE MATCHED IN FORM. PLANT
‘TERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES SHALL BE OBTANED FROM THE
‘SHADE TREES
SANE SOURCE. PLANTS SHALL NOT BE ROOT—BOUNO OR LOOSE IN THEIR CONTAINERS. HANOLE ALL PLANTS WITH CARE IN TRANSPORTING,
or
‘MULCH
3° DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH
o
cY
TAL SHRUBS
‘8 (1 PRESERVED) X 100 POINTS = 600
PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE UNTIL INSPECTION ANO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. FIELD COLLECTED, PARK GRADE, OR BARE ROOT NATERIAL SHALL NOT
BE USED UNLESS APPROVED GY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.
3463
SEED
IDOT CL 2A SEED MIX/ MULCH METHOD 2
22 SHRUBS X 15 POTS = 330
t
‘SY
ge
15.
‘ALL PLANTING BED EOCES TO BE SHOVEL CUT.
GENERAL NOTES:
TOTAL: 1,130 POINTS (1,073 POINTS REQUIRED)
|
16.
CONTRACTOR SHALL USE CAUTION WHEN DIGGING TREE PITS IN THE VICINITY OF UNDERGROUND UTIUTY LINES ANO MAY NEED TO HAND DIG
1, SEEOING SHALL BE APPLIED AND STABILIZED PER IOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD ANO BRIOGE CONSTRUCTION [MOST RECENT VERSION)
aa
THE PITS IN MANY OF THESE INSTANCES.
7
#2
-53
‘SHADE_TREES
‘3 X 100 POINTS = 500
!
TAL SHRUBS
4X15 POINTS = 60
17.
ALL AREAS DESIGNED TO RECENE SOUD SOD SHALL BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO GRASSING OPERATIONS. FINISH GRADE
$s
zz ge
Low SHRUBS
AT TURF AREAS SHALL BE 3/4".
BELOW TOP OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT OR CURBS.
‘
a2
PRESERVED)
74 X 10 POINTS = 740 (10 EXSTING TO BE
Ze
CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELO ADJUST PLANT LOCATIONS TO ACCOMMODATE ALL LIGHTING ANO ENSURE PLANTS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH LIGHTING.
PERENNIALS /GRASSES,
20 X 1 = 20 (20 EXISTING TO BE PRESERVED)
19.
FERTIUZING, AS SPECIFIED, STAKING, WATERING AND ONE (1) YEAR PLANT WARRANTY FOR INSTALLED PLANT MATERIAL, SHALL BE CONSIDERED
TOTAL: 1,320 POINTS (1,270 POINTS REQUIRED)
WQOENTAL TO THE PLANT’ ITEMS,
an
20.
MUSHROOM COMPOST SHALL BE FINELY SCREENED, HOMOGENOUS, DECOMPOSED ORGANIC MATERIAL SUITABLE FOR HORTICULTURAL USE AS
‘SHADE TREES
V1 X 100 PONTS = 1,100
AVAILABLE FROM MIOWEST TRADING HORTICULTURAL SUPPLIES, INC. ST. CHARLES, IL 60174 (630) 365-1990 OR APPROVED EQUAL. MIX
WG
THOROUGHLY IN PLANT BED BEFORE INSTALUNG PLANTS.
TOTAL: 1,100 POINTS (1,078 POINTS REQUIRED)
a
WARRANTY: ONE (1) YEAR REPLACEMENT WARRANTY FOR ALL PLANT MATERULS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THIS PROJECT. WARRANTY
BUILDING FOUNDANONS
SHALL COVER PLANTS WHICH HAVE DIED OR PARTIALLY DIED (THEREBY RUINING THEIR NATURAL SHAPE), BUT SHALL NOT INCLUOE DAMAGE BY
WHERE FOUNDATION
CANNOT BE INSTALLED BECAUSE OF PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR
ABNORMAL FREEZES, DROUGHT OR NEGUGENCE BY THE OWNER. THE WARRANTY IS INTENOED TO COVER
ACCESS TO THE BUILDING, UP TO A
CONTRACTOR NEGUGENCE, INFESTATIONS, DISEASE AND DAMACE OR SHOCK TO PLANTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
FIFTY (90) PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF POINTS REQUIRED WAY BE PERMITTED.
MAINTAINING AND WATERING THE PLANT MATERIAL AS NECESSARY, TO ENSURE GROWTH ANO ESTABUSHMENT DURING THE 1-YEAR WARRANTY
PERIOO. ANY PLANTS THAT ARE NOT IN A LIVE, HEALTHY, GROWING CONDON AT THE ENO OF THE 1~YEAR WARRANTY PERIOO SHALL BE
LENGTH OF BUILDING PERIMETER (IN FEET) X 4 = POINTS REQUIRED
REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. PLANTS REPLACED UNOER WARRANTY WILL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1)
‘YEAR FOLLOWING REPLACEMENT.
LOT 1: 434 LF X 4 = 1,736 POINTS
143 UF X 4 = $72 X 0.5 = 266 POINT DEDUCTION (PEDESTRIAN / VEHICULAR ACCESS)
7398 = 208 = 1,450 POTS REQUIRED
GENERAL NOTES ~ SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS— WARRANTY AND MAINTENANCE OF SODDED ANO SEEDED AREAS
1
Lor 2;
1 X 4 = 2.444 PowTs
MOWING, TRIMMING AND REMOVAL OF GRASS CLIPPINGS IN TURF AREAS, DURING INTIAL 60 DAYS, SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
163 UF x
= 660 X 0.5 = 330 POINT DEDUCTION (PEDESTRUN / VEHICULAR ACCESS)
THE CONTRACTOR. DURING THIS TIME, CONTRACTOR SHALL MOW TURF ‘AREAS AT REGULAR INTERVALS TO NANTAIN AT A NAXINUM
2646 =
= 2,114 POWTS REQUIRED
HEIGHT OF 2-1/2 INCHES. 00 NOT CUT MORE THAN 1/3 OF GRASS BLADE AT ANY ONE MOWING. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO
2
NEATLY TRIM EDGES WHERE NECESSARY AND RENOVE CLIPPINGS AFTER MOWING ANO TRIMMING,
WARRANTY:
vor)
‘A, WARRANTY OF SEEDED AND SODDED AREAS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE BID ITEM,
TAL SHRUBS
40x 13
600 PORTS
B, THE WARRANTY IS TO GUARANTEE COMPLETED SEED/SOO AREAS FOR A PERIOD OF 1 YEAR AFTER INITIAL ACCEPTANCE HAS GEEN
Low SHRUBS
45X10
440 PONTS
DOCUMENTED.
‘SHADE TREES
4% 100 = 400 PONTS
C, REPLACEMENT COSTS ARE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY, EXCEPT FOR THOSE RESULTING FROM LOSS OR DAMAGE DUE TO
VANDALISM, CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, ACTS OF NEGLECT ON THE PART OF OTHERS, PHYSICAL DAMAGE BY ANIMALS, VEHICLES, FIRE, OR
TOTAL: 1,450 POINTS (1,450 POINTS REQUIRED)
LOSSES QUE TO CURTAILMENT OF WATER BY LOCAL AUTHORITY, OR BY “ACTS OF GOD.”
tor 2
CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES WITH THE OWNER DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD.
PERENNIALS:
TAL SHRUBS
93x)
93 PORTS
B, MANTENANCE OF SEEO/SOO AREAS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY TRAINED PERSONNEL SKILLED IN IDENTIFYING DESIRED AND
LOW SHRUBS
67 X 15 = 1,003 PONTS
UNDESIRED PLANT NATERUL.
‘SHADE TREES
74 X10 = 740 PONTS
C. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR WAINTENANCE OF SEEDED ANO SOO AREAS DURING THE 1 YEAR WARRANTY PERIOO WITH
3X 100 = 300 PONTS
THE EXCEPTION OF ROUTINE MOWING OF TURF AREAS. ROUTINE NOWING OF TURF AREAS, DURING THE 1 YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD,
WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER ONCE INITIAL ACCEPTANCE HAS BEEN DOCUNENTED.
TOTAL: 2,138 POINTS (2,114 POINTS REQUIRED)
0, MANTENANCE OF SEEDED ANO SOD AREAS SHALL INCLUDE:
‘© WATERING TQ PREVENT GRASS ANO SOIL FROM DRYING OUT.
PARKING LOTS
ROUING THE SURFACE TO REMOVE MINOR DEPRESSIONS OR IRRECULARMES.
EACH LANDSCAPED ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN ONE (1) SHADE TREE IF AT THE ENO OF A SINCLE ROW
* CONTROLLING GROWTH OF WEEDS. APPLY HERBICIDES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.
PARKONG SPACES, AND TWO (2) SHADE TREES IF AT THE END OF A DOUBLE ROW,
qt
QAMAGE RESULTING FROM IMPROPER USE OF HERBICIDES.
PROTECTING SEEDED,
AREAS WITH WARNING SIGNS DURING MAINTENANCE AND WARRANTY PERIOD AS DEEMED NECESSARY.
i
IN THE SPRING OF EACH YEAR DURING THE 1 YEAR WARRANTY PERIOO, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CORRECT ANO RESEED AS
MATERA yo TREES it craien._—___parovingp
cy
6
ORIGINALLY SPECIFIED, ANY DEFECTS IN THE SEEDED/SOO AREAS AND GRASS STAND, SUCH AS WEEDY AREAS, ERODED AREAS,
AND BARE SPOTS, UNTIL AFFECTED AREAS ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE.
‘SIGNS
Ne
‘A LANOSCAPE AREA EQUAL TO ONE AND ONE HALF (1 4) TIMES THE SIGN AREA INSTALLED AROUND THE
IN THE SPRING DURING THE 1 YEAR WARRANTY PERIOO, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR TO ORIGINAL
BASE OF THE SIGN.
DEFECTS, AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
CONDITION, ALL DAMAGES TO PROPERTY RESULTING FROM THE SEEDING/SOOOING OPERATION OR FROM THE REMEDYING OF
XS! = 40 X 2 = BO X 1.5 = 120 SF (PROP, SIGN EAST)
SPEQAL REQUIREMENTS ~ MAINTENANCE.
BX 5! = 40 X 2 = BOX 1.5 = 120 SF (PROP. SIGN WEST)
A BEGIN MAINTENANCE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING INSTALLATION OF SOD AND CONTINUE FOR A PERIOD UNTIL SOODED AREAS ARE ESTABLISHED WITH
QSTING LANDSCAPING TO BE MANTAINED AROUND EXISTING SCN
‘SOD ROOTED IN PLACE. MAINTENANCE PERIOD SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS.
‘MATERIAL
REQUIRED.
B, MANTENANCE OF SODDED AREAS SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, WEEDING, MOWING TO A 2 = 2 1/2 INCH HEIGHT AFTER HOGHT HAS EXCEEDED 3
LANDSCAPE AREA
120 SF
‘330 SF (WEST SIGN)
INCHES AND PRIOR TO 4 INCHES. ANO REPLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION OF SOO AS ORICINALLY SPECIFIED FOR SOOOED AREAS FAUING TO
SURVIVE. CUPPINGS FROM
LANDSCAPE AREA
120 SF
WHICH MAT ON THE GRASS, ARE TO BE REMOVED.
143 SF (EAST SIGN)
BAR SS ONE INCH ON
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS = WARRANTY
OFNGAL CRAMNCS
— a 1
a
‘A. A WARRANTY IS REQUIRED TO GUARANTEE COMPLETED SOOOING OPERATIONS PROVIDING A UNIFORMLY DENSE, LIVE, ANO HEALTHY STAND OF
F NOT OFC ICH,
GRASS, FREE OF WEEDS AND UNDESIRABLE GRASSES, DEBRIS, AND FREE OF EROOED AREAS, BARE SPOTS, DISEASES, AND INSECTS AT THE END
OF ONE YEARS FOLLOWING THE MINIMUM MAINTENANCE PERIOD OR PROJECT ACCEPTANCE, WHICHEVER IS NORE RECENT.
8. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE AS
Y SPEGMED AREAS THAT HAVE FAILED TO SURVIVE, AS OFTEN AS REQUIRED, TO ESTABUSH THE
‘SODDED LAWN AREA UNTIL ACCEPTED; AT NO ADOTIONAL COMPENSATION.
bea ay: RS
C. REPAIR ANO REPLACE TO ORIGINAL CONDITION ALL DAMAGES TO PROPERTY RESULTANT FROM THE SODOING OPERATION AND ALL DAMAGES AS A
JAPPROVED: HAE,
RESULT FROM THE REMEDYING OF THESE DEFECTS, MTHOUT ADOTIONAL COMPENSATION.
208 DATE:
92-20-2019
pos we: 6 f20365.04 |
DRAWING
FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN knowwha
below.
L-03
Call before you dig.

===== PDF PAGE 33 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
REE PAT TO BE TwO (2) TMCS,
THE: MOTH OF ROOT BAL
41 TYP. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL
SOME: MIS
9 TYP. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
H
ae
Vn
PEt
i Ms
a8
j
4° spape cee,
TREE PIT TO OC Two (2) TES
“THE MOTH OF ROGT BALL
2 TYP. ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL
SOME: MIS
‘staonc_oetan,
Two secnows oF RUDDER
HOSE PER TREE
Two cur wes PER oa Wie:
tree
sven, Tee ste
weany secure wi
caus:
*APPUES TO SINGLE TRU OCCOUOUS TREES 3° CAL. AND LESS & CVERCREDN
TREES 8° WT. AND LESS & ALL MAATI-STEM TREES.
sae pouan
ra nee stenoves oF nveecn
Ly ose ren tee
on Gey. we
Fennct” “ —Rie>
sven. wee sta
weany SECURE TH
cues:
“ERE STARE ELT: om #8 cee es ee na
‘SAE: HIS
oa
PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL
10=
REE PIT TO BE Two (2) Tues,
THE WOT OF ROOT BALL
3 TYP. EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING DETAIL
SORE: NTS.
Porement Trp.
cure & Cutter Ty)
Tur soc pune sep soe——
sch 08 detied in tre Lendscope
‘Speciicetions. Halé Wich 8
{em tree Uv ‘ond si steme
‘Shovel Cut Bod _Cége ot 43
Stores cops 8 oren
Finaned qoce ot beaine ER
E—~\
fe
Wo | CATE
T/T
8 TYP. ROOT PRUNING DETAIL
‘SCALE: TS
BOXXX MIKA AR KXAKKXX RL
i egoasocasrigoacoacuicn ‘ou srarnacenaileetocetoett i
I setateateteateateatel ltyltattattatleteteetetatete
ROO OSAKA
+ ores ee +
1 1 TYP. TREE PROTECTION SNOW FENCE DETAIL
ORANGE SHOW FENCE
1M" 0D. cavMare
FONE POST, Post
SUPPORTS LOCATED. HO
MORE: THAN 8° APAIT.
LOCATE Fence AT €OGE OF
Tate ORPUMt OR AT EOE
FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN know what's below,
Call before you dig.
[LUNGS DESIGN RM
PHONE: 815.385.1778
FAX: 815.385.1781
# 184.001322
420 N. FRONT
STREET, SUE 100
McHENRY, 60050
HRGreen
JIGGED VENTURES RESUBDIVISION
LOTS 1 & 2
WEST CHICAGO, IL