===== PDF PAGE 1 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
ICA
Clty
WEST CHICAGO
WHERE HISTORY & PROGRESS MEET
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Monday, August 8, 2022
7:00 P.M. - Council Chambers
AGENDA
Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of a Quorum
Approval of Minutes
A. May 9, 2022
Public Participation
Items for Consent.
A. Zoning Text Amendments — Staff is proposing a number of clarifications and
corrections to the Zoning Ordinance. There are no new regulations contained in this
set of text amendments. Plan Commission voted unanimously in favor of the
amendments.
Items for Discussion
Unfinished Business
New Business
Reports from Staff
Adjournment
475 Main Street | T (630) 293-2200 Ruben Pineda
West Chicago, Illinois F (630) 293-3028 “a
60185 www.westchicago.org | Nancy M. Smith Michael L. Guttman
| 8 s CITY CLERK CITY ADMINISTRATOR

===== PDF PAGE 2 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Draft
MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
May 9, 2022 7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of a Quorum.
Tom Dabareiner called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Roll call found Aldermen James Beifuss, Christine Dettmann, Matthew Garling, John
Jakabcsin, and Jayme Sheahan present.
Also in attendance was Community Development Director, Tom Dabareiner.
2. Approval of Minutes.
A. April 11, 2022.
Alderman Dettman moved and Alderman Jakabcsin seconded a motion to approve
the minutes. Voting Aye: Aldermen Birch Ferguson, Dettmann, Jakabcsin, Sheahan
and Stout.
In light of the Committee’s absent chair and vice chair, Mr. Dabareiner asked the members
to nominate a temporary chair.
Alderman Beifuss moved to nominate Alderman Matthew Garling and Alderman
Sheahan seconded the motion. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Dettmann, Garling,
Jakabesin, and Sheahan.
3. Public Participation.
Some West Chicago residents voiced concerns about the proposed Pulte Development.
Thirteen residents indicated they were opposed and four residents conveyed specific
concerns. Collectively, the residents expressed such concerns as road danger, land use,
flooding, ground water contamination, smaller lot sizes and increased density, increased
traffic, decreased property values of surrounding homes, speeding traffic, environmental
impact, stormwater capacity, location of proposed entrance, increased traffic accidents,
character of open feel in this area, speed limit on Klein Road, proposed access points and
reduced visibility.
Development Committee Minutes
May 9, 2022
Page 1 of 4

===== PDF PAGE 3 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
4. Items for Consent. None.
5. Items for Discussion.
A.
Outdoor Dining — Several text amendments are proposed to allow seasonal
outdoor dining, with liquor service, within the public right of way (it is already
allowed on private property). Licensing and insurance would be required, along
with a number of other regulations.
Alderman Beifuss stated that the requirements created by staff for outdoor dining on
sidewalks is reasonable and makes sense. There are ongoing demands for this type
of outdoor seating, and a lot of towns are continuing to do this. This will support the
downtown businesses. He also agreed with the “L” liquor license requirement.
Alderman Jakabcsin moved, and Alderman Dettman seconded the motion to
approve Item 5.A. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss, Dettman, Garling, Jakabcsin,
Sheahan.
The Preserve at West Branch — The Plan Commission voted unanimously to
recommend a proposed 226-unit single-family Pulte development known as the
Preserve at West Branch, located north of the St. Andrews Golf Course
property. This item was tabled last month because of a request from a nearby
Homeowners’ Association.
Alderman Jakabcsin thanked those who spoke for their comments. They made valid
points. He is still concerned about the density with the 266 homes, which further
leads to the concerns over traffic.
Alderman Beifuss thanked the public for their remarks. He said that hearing their
comments regarding stormwater and traffic created concerns for him. He asked Mr.
Dabareiner to clarify the proposed lot size of about 9,500 square feet, but stated he
does not see this development as particularly dense. He then asked staff about County
stormwater standards. Mr. Dabareiner stated they must enforce County law whereby
no more water can leave a property at the same rate as it does today. Alderman
Beifuss stated it was interesting to hear about the periodic flooding on Smith Road.
It is possible another development could aggravate that, but steps will have to be
taken to ameliorate stormwater per the County. He asked about the larger lots
abutting the current development, and Mr. Dabareiner said this was intended when
the property was annexed 15 years ago.
He said he heard interesting information regarding Klein Road. It makes sense to
have two entrance points to a development. The Annexation Agreement indicated
Development Committee Minutes
May 9, 2022
Page 2 of 4

===== PDF PAGE 4 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
the entrance would be on Klein, but there is a concern about that location with respect
to sight line problems and safety. He wondered if it would be possible to change this.
He stated there is currently a high demand for housing and home prices are high as a
result. He reiterated his concerns about stormwater and safety. He asked staff if all
of the notices went out, and Mr. Dabareiner replied they had.
Alderman Garling asked which changes were made to the development. Mr.
Dabareiner replied that the park was enlarged, the lot sizes were changed and the
number of units was decreased. They were not previously in compliance with the
code, but they are now. When a development meets code, they must abide by
approving it. Alderman Garling asked if the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of
Appeals (PC/ZBA) approved the most recent plans at their last meeting. Mr. Matt
Brolley, Pulte Project Manager, indicated they had, and Mr. Dabareiner added that
the PC/ZBA voted unanimously to approve it.
Alderman Jakabcsin stated he received many questions as to why the placement of
the entrance on Klein Road is so far on the southern edge. He said he was told it is
because of the Annexation Agreement as dictated by the DuPage County Forest
Preserve to protect the fen. Mr. Dabareiner agreed about the Annexation Agreement,
but was unsure about the fen.
Alderman Garling thanked the public for speaking, and he expressed concerns
regarding the placement the Klein Road entrance, the character of the area and size
of homes. He asked staff if the entrance could be moved. Mr. Dabareiner stated the
entrance is the most direct route out and it was adopted in the Annexation Agreement,
which makes it law. That location was decided on 15 years ago in public meetings.
Mr. Matt Broley stated the location of the Klein entrance was part of a process with
the Forest Preserve District long before Pulte became involved. They own the rest of
that land and the seller only owns this access strip. He said that Pulte has submitted
a traffic study that the City consultant has reviewed and approved. They also
submitted their initial stormwater plan and they will meet all DuPage County
requirements. Fifteen years ago, the City entered into an agreement with the seller.
It is a binding contract that provides for R-3 Zoning and lot sizes smaller than 10,000
square feet. They are following exactly what the Annexation Agreement says, and
they are here tonight for approval.
Alderman Beifuss asked staff who will own all of the roads when the development
is complete. Mr. Dabareiner replied a small segment is in the City and the rest is in
the Township. Alderman Beifuss asked who would own the access point to Klein
Road, and Mr. Dabareiner said the City would. Alderman Beifuss stated the access
point on Klein Road appears to have some connection to the Forest Preserve interests,
but it is not directly attributable to safety concerns. He still has concerns. It is not flat
topography, and the residents around there know it is a blind hill. That is a reasonable
Development Committee Minutes
May 9, 2022
Page 3 of 4

===== PDF PAGE 5 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
6. Unfi
7. New
concern. Mr. Dabareiner pointed out that the City hired a traffic consultant to review
the KLOA studies. They concluded that the study was conducted properly and
arrived at the same numbers. They were in agreement with the results. Alderman
Beifuss asked if the safety of the Klein Road intersection and its sight line was
considered. Mr. Dabareiner said it was part of the study. Alderman Garling asked
when it was performed, and Mr. Dabareiner replied last year. Alderman Garling
asked about its accuracy if it was done during the Pandemic. Mr. Dabareiner
responded that the counts were adjusted to account for pre-pandemic levels.
Alderman Jakabcsin asked if Pulte is looking into installing radar signs. Mr.
Dabareiner said this is part of their proposal. Alderman Sheahan asked if it would
include hidden driveway or entrance, but staff did not have those details.
Alderman Garling asked about the wording from the Agenda Summary, and if it
means the stormwater requirements have not been met in the current plan. Mr.
Dabareiner indicated the preliminary plans have been approved, but the final plans
are the ones that will receive full stormwater approval. That is the plan that counts.
As it stands, there are no wetlands or other concerns.
Alderman Garling called for a vote to approve Item 5. B. for Discussion. Voting
Aye: Aldermen Dettman and Sheahan. Voting Nay: Aldermen Beifuss,
Jakabcsin and Garling.
nished Business. None.
Business. None.
8. Reports from Staff. None.
9. Adjo
urnment.
Alderman Beifuss moved, and Alderman Sheahan seconded the motion to adjourn
the Development Committee meeting at 8:18 p.m. Voting Aye: Aldermen Beifuss,
Dettman, Garling, Jakabcsin, Sheahan.
Respectfull
Jane Burke
y submitted,
Development Committee Minutes
May 9, 2022
Page 4 of 4

===== PDF PAGE 6 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
CITY OF WEST CHICAGO
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
ITEM TITLE:
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: oA.
Zoning Text Amendments
Corrections and Clarifications FILE NUMBER:
Ordinance 22-O0-0025 COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: Aug. 8, 2022
COUNCIL AGENDA DATE:
STAFF REVIEW: Tom Dabareiner, AICP SIGNATURE Mpa
APPROVED BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR: Michael Guttman SIGNATURE
ITEM SUMMARY:
Staff has prepared a series of Zoning Text Amendments that clarify requirements, codify past practices,
and remove inconsistencies within certain regulations for fences and driveways. Staff is not proposing
to add new regulations but instead to explain in clear terms how certain codes within these sections are
enforced.
A public hearing for the proposed Zoning Text Amendments was held on August 2, 2022. The Plan
Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the proposed Zoning Text Amendments.
ACTION PROPOSED:
Review and approval of the proposed Zoning Text Amendments.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Attachments:
Proposed Zoning Text Amendments
Draft Ordinance 22-O0-0025

===== PDF PAGE 7 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Proposed Text Amendments to Appendix A (Zoning Code)
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of West Chicago
Development Committee
August 8, 2022
Underline = New Text; Strikethrough = Deleted Text
ARTICLE VII
SUPPLEMENTARY USE AND BULK REGULATIONS
Amendment to Section 7.1(B) (Fences — Fence Construction Standards) of Appendix
A (Zoning Code) as follows:
(1) Location: Each fence shall be located completely within the boundaries of the lot e#
for which it-istoeated the permit has been issued, including all posts, bases and other
structural parts.
Amendment to Section 7.1(C) (Fences — District Regulations) of Appendix A
(Zoning Code) as follows:
(1) Residential districts.
a. Only decorative and open fences shall be permitted in actual front yards and shall
not exceed four (4) feet in height, except within a visibility triangle, in which case
the fence shall not exceed three (3) feet in height. Chain-link fences shall be
prohibited in the actual front yard.
b. Fences shall be permitted in actual interior and corner side yards, provided that the
fence does not extend beyond the front line of the building or structure and shall not
exceed six (6) feet in height, except within a visibility triangle, in which case the
fence shall not exceed three (3) feet in height.
c. Fences shall be permitted in actual rear yards and shall not exceed six (6) feet in
height, except within a visibility triangle, in which case the fence shall not exceed
three (3) feet in height;. erin Fences located in an actual rear yard extending along
any state highway or railroad right-of-way, in-whieh-casethefenee shall not exceed
eight (8) feet in height.
d. Privacy fences immediately adjacent to patios or first floor decks shall not exceed
six (6) feet in height, as measured from the top of the patio or deck. A privacy fence
immediately adjacent to a deck other than a first floor deck shall not exceed five (5)
feet in height, as measured from the top of the deck. Said privacy fences shall not
exceed a total of ten (10) lineal feet and shall not require a permit.

===== PDF PAGE 8 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
e. Fences within a frentyard visibility triangle shall not exceed three (3) feet in height.
height.
(2) Commercial and manufacturing districts.
a. Fences shall be permitted in interior side yards, corner side yards and rear yards
and shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height, except within a visibility triangle,
which shall not exceed three (3) feet in height. Fences that are required to
provide screening of outside activity or storage, in accordance with Section 11.2-
1(C)(2)(a) of Appendix A (the Zoning Code), shall be permitted up to ten (10)
feet in height, except within a visibility triangle, which shall not exceed three (3)
feet in height.
b. Fences shall be permitted in actual front yards and shall not exceed four (4) feet in
height in commercially zoned districts and six (6) feet in height in manufacturing
zoned districts, except within a visibility triangle, which shall not exceed three (3)
feet in height.
c. Fences within a frontyard visibility triangle shall not exceed three (3) feet in
height. Mexeesseithinceormercside pond isthe tewele shall petececed four
(4 feeHintreight.
ARTICLE XIII
OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING
Amendment to Section 13.1-13 (A) (Parking — Location of Parking — Residential
Districts) of Appendix A (Zoning Code) as follows:
(A) Residential districts.
) Permit required: No person shall begin the construction, alteration, or
replacement of a driveway within a Residential District without first having
applied for and obtained a permit in writing to do so from the City of West
Chicago.
(2) Driveway coverage of a lot. A ew driveway shall cover no more than fifteen (15)
percent of a lot. However, in the event that a new driveway leads to a detached
garage located behind the rear building line, the driveway shall cover no more
than twenty (20) percent of the lot. All existing driveways that are to be repaired
or replaced at or less than the same dimensions and areas that they currently exist
shall be exempt from the aforementioned lot coverage regulations in this
subsection. Existing driveways enlarged beyond the current dimensions shall
comply with the aforementioned lot coverage regulations in this subsection.
2} (3) Driveway coverage of front yard. A driveway shall not cover more than the
following percentages of an actual front yard of a residential lot:

===== PDF PAGE 9 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
a. R-1..... 40%
b. R-2..... 40%
C. -3 ..... 42.5%
d. R-4..... 45%
e. R-5..... 45%
3} (4) Driveway width:
a. Driveways (other than ribbon driveways): The maximum width of a driveway
in the actual front yard shall not exceed forty-five (45) percent of the lot
width. The minimum width of a driveway, at any point in the driveway, shall
not be less than eight (8) feet.
b. Ribbon driveways: The maximum width of a ribbon driveway in the actual
Sront yard, as measured from the outermost edges of each strip, shall not
exceed forty-five (45) percent of the lot width. The minimum width of each
strip in a ribbon driveway shall be not less than two (2) feet and the strips
shall have a minimum separation of five (5) feet on center.
¢4) (5) Parking spaces accessory to dwellings located in any residential zoning district
shall be located on the same lot as the dwelling. Each parking space accessory to
a multifamily dwelling shall be unobstructed so that no vehicle needs to be moved
in order to allow another vehicle to enter/exit the parking area.
5} (6) There shall be no parking except on driveways, parking lots, or in enclosed
P Ig excep ays, P' g
garages, constructed consistent with the provisions of this section.
(7) All new driveways shall lead directly from a street or alleyway to the entrance of
a garage.
(6} (8) New-driveways Driveways eecessoryto-dwellingstocated ieany residential
zoning-distriet shall be surfaced with a minimum of two and one-half (2 %2)
inches of bituminous asphalt pavement over six (6) inches of compacted gravel,
or with a minimum of four (4) inches of concrete pavement_over four (4) inches
of compacted gravel, or with interlocking pavers designed and approved for
vehicle parking over ten (10) inches of compacted gravel.
Existing driveways that do not comply with the aforementioned surfacing
requirements in this subsection as of December 20, 2021 shall be deemed legal
nonconforming with respect to the surface material and may remain provided
that no expansion or replacement of the legal nonconforming driveway occurs.
An expansion or replacement of the legal nonconforming driveway shall
require compliance with the surfacing requirements of this subsection.
() Driveway approaches within a public right-of-way shall comply with Section 15-
4. - Standards and procedures for driveway approaches and sidewalks, of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of West Chicago.
7) (10) All new single-family dwellings shall be required to provide two (2) completely
enclosed parking spaces.

===== PDF PAGE 10 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
8) (11) It shall be prohibited to use a garage as a dwelling space unless it is attached to a
& SP
house and another garage providing the same number of parking spaces is
provided on the same property.
£6) (12) All parking spaces accessory to permitted non-dwelling uses located in any
residential district generally shall be located on the same lot as the use served. An
exception: The administrator may allow such parking facilities to be located on
another parcel within two hundred (200) feet of the use served if the "same lot"
requirement is not feasible.
€24) (13) Paved and concrete driveways and sidewalks may only be expanded using the
same or higher quality surface material as approved by the Code Official.
22} (14) Driveway location.
a.
Is
ef
Residences having primary access off of Neltnor Boulevard (IL Route 59) or
North Avenue (IL Route 64) shall be exempt from these regulations.
Driveways Sshall have a minimum setback of one (1) foot from an interior
side lot line, exeluding driveways unless the driveway is located in the R-5
zoning district and thet leads to a detached garage, in which case no
setback shall be required.
Driveways Sshall be prohibited in an actual interior side yard, except when
leading to a detached garage.
When leading to an attached garage the driveway shall only be located in
the area directly in front of the garage or in that portion of the actual front
yard between the closest interior side lot line and the garage.
No portion of any driveway Driveways-in front-of the non-garage portion-of
the-residence-shall-beprohibited. may be located in front of a non-garage
portion of a residence.
Any portion of a driveway that leads to an attached garage and is located in
that portion of the actual front yard between the closest interior side lot line
and the garage shall be tapered so that the maximum width of the driveway
at the property line is equal to or less than the width of the garage. This
portion of the driveway shall have a maximum width of nine (9) feet and a
maximum length of eighteen (18) feet, measured from the front of the garage
to the start of the taper. The taper shall reduce at a maximum ratio of one (1)
foot length for every one (1) foot in width of that portion of the driveway.

===== PDF PAGE 11 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
ORDINANCE NO. 22-0-0025
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF
THE CITY OF WEST CHICAGO —- APPENDIX A
ARTICLES VII AND XIII OF THE ZONING CODE
RELATING TO FENCES AND DRIVEWAYS
WHEREAS, the City of West Chicago periodically reviews the text of the Zoning Code
for inconsistencies, discrepancies, and regulations in need of clarification ; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Zoning Code, from time to time, to explain in
clear terms how certain codes are enforced; and
WHEREAS, vague or inconsistent regulations within the Zoning Code must be addressed
to avoid confusion; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes it is in the best interest of the City to clarify certain
sections of the Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, Notice of Public Hearing on said text amendment was published in the Dai-
ly Herald on or about July 18, 2022, as required by the ordinances of the City of West Chicago
and the statutes of the State of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was conducted by the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of
Appeals of the City of West Chicago on August 2, 2022 pursuant to said Notice; and
WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing all interested parties had an opportunity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the City of West Chicago have received the
recommendation of the Plan Commission/Zoning Board of Appeals which contains specific
findings of fact, pursuant to Recommendation No. 22-RC-0008, a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit “A” which is, by this reference, made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of West Chi-
cago, Du Page County, Illinois, in regular session assembled, as follows:
Section 1. That Section 7.1(B) — Fence Construction Standards, of Article VII, Appendix
A, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of West Chicago be amended as follows:
(1) Location: Each fence shall be located completely within the boundaries of the lot on
for which it-is-toeated the permit has been issued, including all posts, bases and other
structural parts.
Section 2. That Section 7.1(C) — District Regulations, of Article VII, Appendix A, of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of West Chicago be amended as follows:
(1) Residential districts.
Ordinance 22-0-0025
Page 1 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 12 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
a. Only decorative and open fences shall be permitted in actual front yards and shall
not exceed four (4) feet in height, except within a visibility triangle, in which case
the fence shall not exceed three (3) feet in height. Chain-link fences shall be prohib-
ited in the actual front yard.
b. Fences shall be permitted in actual interior and corner side yards, provided that the
fence does not extend beyond the front line of the building or structure and shall not
exceed six (6) feet in height, except within a visibility triangle, in which case the
fence shall not exceed three (3) feet in height.
c. Fences shall be permitted in actual rear yards and shall not exceed six (6) feet in
pie except within a visibility triangle, in which case the fence shall not exceed
three (3) feet in height;. erin Fences located in an actual rear yard extending along
any state highway or railroad right-of-way-in-whieh-easethefenee shall not exceed
eight (8) feet in height.
d. Privacy fences immediately adjacent to patios or first floor decks shall not exceed six
(6) feet in height, as measured from the top of the patio or deck. A privacy fence im-
mediately adjacent to a deck other than a first floor deck shall not exceed five (5)
feet in height, as measured from the top of the deck. Said privacy fences shall not ex-
ceed a total of ten (10) lineal feet and shall not require a permit.
e. Fences within a feont-yard visibility triangle shall not exceed three (3) feet in height.
(2) Commercial and manufacturing districts.
a. Fences shall be permitted in interior side yards, corner side yards and rear yards
and shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height, except within a visibility triangle, which
shall not exceed three (3) feet in height. Fences that are required to provide screen-
ing of outside activity or storage, in accordance with Section 11.2-1(C)(2)(a) of Ap-
pendix A (the Zoning Code), shall be permitted up to ten (10) feet in height, except
within a visibility triangle, which shall not exceed three (3) feet in height.
b. Fences shall be permitted in actual front yards and shall not exceed four (4) feet in
height in commercially zoned districts and six (6) feet in height in manufacturing
zoned districts, except within a visibility triangle, which shall not exceed three (3)
feet in height.
c. Fences within a feent-yard visibility triangle shall not exceed three (3) feet in height.
height.
Section 3. That Section 13.1-13(A) — Location of Parking, of Article XII, Appendix A,
of the Code of Ordinances of the City of West Chicago, be amended to add the following: de-
fined terms:
(A) Residential districts.
(1) Permit required: No person shall begin the construction, alteration, or replace-
ment of a driveway within a Residential District without first having applied for and
obtained a permit in writing to do so from the City of West Chicago.
Ordinance 22-0-0025
Page 2 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 13 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
2 (2) Driveway coverage of a lot. A #ew driveway shall cover no more than fifteen
(15) percent of a lot. However, in the event that a new driveway leads to a detached
garage located behind the rear building line, the driveway shall cover no more than
twenty (20) percent of the lot. All existing driveways that are to be repaired or re-
placed at or less than the same dimensions and areas that they currently exist shall be
exempt from the aforementioned lot coverage regulations in this subsection. Existing
driveways enlarged beyond the current dimensions shall comply with the aforemen-
tioned lot coverage regulations in this subsection.
€2} (3) Driveway coverage of front yard. A driveway shall not cover more than the
following percentages of an actual front yard of a residential lot:
a. R-1..... 40%
b. R-2..... 40%
c. R-3..... 42.5%
d. R-4.....45%
e. R-5.....45%
3} (4) Driveway width:
a. Driveways (other than ribbon driveways): The maximum width of a drive-
way in the actual front yard shall not exceed forty-five (45) percent of the
lot width. The minimum width of a driveway, at any point in the driveway,
shall not be less than eight (8) feet.
b. Ribbon driveways: The maximum width of a ribbon driveway in the actual
front yard, as measured from the outermost edges of each strip, shall not
exceed forty-five (45) percent of the lot width. The minimum width of each
strip in a ribbon driveway shall be not less than two (2) feet and the strips
shall have a minimum separation of five (5) feet on center.
€4 (5) Parking spaces accessory to dwellings located in any residential zoning dis-
trict shall be located on the same lot as the dwelling. Each parking space accessory
to a multifamily dwelling shall be unobstructed so that no vehicle needs to be moved
in order to allow another vehicle to enter/exit the parking area.
5} (6) There shall be no parking except on driveways, parking lots, or in enclosed
garages, constructed consistent with the provisions of this section.
(7)_All new driveways shall lead directly from a street or alleyway to the entrance of
a garage.
(6} (8) New-driveways Driveways aecesseryto-dwellings_tecated in-anyresidential
zening-distriet shall be surfaced with a minimum of two and one-half (2 ¥%) inches of
bituminous asphalt pavement over six (6) inches of compacted gravel, or with a min-
imum of four (4) inches of concrete pavement_over four (4) inches of compacted grav-
el, or with interlocking pavers designed and approved for vehicle parking over ten
(10) inches of compacted gravel.
Existing driveways that do not comply with the aforementioned surfacing require-
ments in this subsection as of December 20, 2021 shall be deemed legal nonconform-
ing with respect to the surface material and may remain provided that no expansion
Ordinance 22-0-0025
Page 3 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 14 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
or replacement of the legal nonconforming driveway occurs. An expansion or re-
placement of the legal nonconforming driveway shall require compliance with the
surfacing requirements of this subsection.
(9) Driveway approaches within a public right-of-way shall comply with Section 15-
4, - Standards and procedures for driveway approaches and sidewalks, of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of West Chicago.
4 (10) All new single-family dwellings shall be required to provide two (2) com-
pletely enclosed parking spaces.
€&} (11) It shall be prohibited to use a garage as a dwelling space unless it is attached
to a house and another garage providing the same number of parking spaces is pro-
vided on the same property.
6} (12) All parking spaces accessory to permitted non-dwelling uses located in any
residential district generally shall be located on the same lot as the use served. An
exception: The administrator may allow such parking facilities to be located on an-
other parcel within two hundred (200) feet of the use served if the "same lot" re-
quirement is not feasible.
44 (13) Paved and concrete driveways and sidewalks may only be expanded using
the same or higher quality surface material as approved by the Code Official.
2 (14) Driveway location.
a. Residences having primary access off of Neltnor Boulevard (IL Route 59) or
North Avenue (IL Route 64) shall be exempt from these regulations.
b. Driveways Sshall have a minimum setback of one (1) foot from an interior
side lot line, exeluding driveways unless the driveway is located in the R-5
zoning district and that leads to a detached garage, in which case no set-
back shall be required.
c. Driveways Sshall be prohibited in an actual interior side yard, except when
leading to a detached garage.
d. When leading to an attached garage the driveway shall only be located in
the area directly in front of the garage or in that portion of the actual front
yard between the closest interior side lot line and the garage.
e. No portion of any driveway Driveways-in front of the nen-garage portion-of
the-residence-shallbe-prehibited_may be located in front of a non-garage
portion of a residence.
e. fAny portion of a driveway that leads to an attached garage and is located in
that portion of the actual front yard between the closest interior side lot line
and the garage shall be tapered so that the maximum width of the driveway
at the property line is equal to or less than the width of the garage. This por-
tion of the driveway shall have a maximum width of nine (9) feet and a max-
imum length of eighteen (18) feet, measured from the front of the garage to
the start of the taper. The taper shall reduce at a maximum ratio of one (1)
foot length for every one (1) foot in width of that portion of the driveway.
Ordinance 22-O-0025
Page 4 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 15 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
Section 4. That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with the pro-
visions of this Ordinance are, to the extent of such conflict, expressly repealed.
Section 5. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its passage, approval
and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
PASSED this day of , 2022.
Alderman Beifuss Alderman Chassee
Alderman Sheehan Alderman Brown
Alderman Hallett Alderman Dettman
Alderman Birch-Ferguson Alderman Dimas
Alderman Swiatek Alderman Garling
Alderman Stout Alderman Short
Alderman Jakabesin Alderman Morano
APPROVED as to form:
City Attorney
APPROVED THIS day of , 2022.
Mayor Ruben Pineda
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk Valeria Perez
PUBLISHED:
Ordinance 22-O-0025
Page 5 of 6

===== PDF PAGE 16 =====
[Extraction: OCR (rendered-page OCR)]
EXHIBIT “A”
RECOMMENDATION # 21-RC-0008
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
SUBJECT: PC 22-09
Zoning Text Amendments.
DATE: August 2, 2022
DECISION: The motion to approve the proposed amendments was approved by a vote of six
(6) “yes” and zero (0) “no”.
RECOMMENDATION:
After a review of the proposed Zoning Text Amendments as presented, the Plan Commis-
sion/Zoning Board of Appeals finds that the proposed amendments do not pose a threat to the
health, safety and welfare of the community. It is the Commission’s opinion that the proposed
amendments will be beneficial to the City of West Chicago.
The amendments are in keeping with the purpose of the Zoning Code. The Plan Commission is
of the opinion that the proposed amendments will protect, promote, and improve the public
health, safety, morals, convenience, order, appearance, prosperity and the general welfare of the
citizens of West Chicago community.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Laimins
Chairperson
VOTE:
For Against Abstain Absent
Laimins Kasprak
Hale
Billingsley
Slattery
Henkin
Banasiak
Ordinance 22-O0-0025
Page 6 of 6