Downtown Revitalization Commission Summary

Downtown Revitalization Commission discretionary agenda highlights for October 26, 2026

West Chicago Downtown Revitalization Commission Agenda Review — October 26, 2026

This table summarizes each Downtown Revitalization Commission agenda action, the money involved, and whether the action appears non-discretionary under the review rubric.

View the PDF text extraction table

Item	Short description	Money involved	Non-discretionary evaluation
3 — September 28 minutes	Consider approval of the September 28, 2026 draft meeting minutes.	No direct City expenditure identified.	Likely non-discretionary / administrative: routine meeting-record approval.
4 — Landmarks Illinois presentation	Receive the preservation and revitalization presentation.	No amount or expenditure request stated.	Informational / administrative: a presentation, with no specific decision or funding request identified.
5 — West Washington Street concept plan scope	Consider the scope of the West Washington Street concept plan.	No fee, contract amount, funding allocation, or expenditure authorization stated.	Discretionary: scope choices can shape future redevelopment planning; the packet does not establish a contract award or final City Council approval.
6.a — Downtown commercial vacancy priorities	Discuss priorities for addressing downtown commercial vacancies.	No direct City expenditure identified; no amount supplied.	Discretionary: priority setting involves policy and resource choices, not merely routine administration.
6.b — Proactive code enforcement	Consider proactive code enforcement in the downtown commercial-vacancy discussion.	No enforcement-program cost, fee, fine, or appropriation supplied.	Discretionary: consideration of an enforcement approach is a policy-direction choice; no new ordinance or final enforcement program is attached.
7 — Commission progress check-in	Review Commission progress.	No expenditure request or amount stated.	Informational / administrative: a numbered progress discussion without a defined approval request.

Detailed analysis of substantive topics

5 — West Washington Street concept plan scope

The agenda notices consideration of scope, not approval of a particular consultant contract. September 28 draft minutes report 16 RFQ submissions, 15 responsive submissions, and three firms interviewed. At that earlier meeting, selection and negotiations were expected to follow. The minutes describe three concepts, phasing and funding recommendations, and possible evaluation of residential use and additional remediation. These are prior-meeting context, not a complete current scope or evidence that a contract has been awarded.

The October 26 packet supplies no proposed scope document, consultant name, contract, amount, or current recommendation. The decision point is what scope the Commission wishes to support; further procurement, budget, or City Council action is not established by this packet and must not be presumed completed.

6.a–6.b — Commercial vacancies and proactive code enforcement

The current agenda separately identifies priorities discussion and consideration of proactive code enforcement. September 28 draft minutes describe Main Street America's earlier presentation on ownership, regulatory, financial, and market causes of vacancies, the need for a building inventory, and tailored responses. This does not mean Main Street America is the presenter on October 26: item 4 specifically names Landmarks Illinois.

Commissioners can discuss which vacancy priorities and enforcement approach to pursue. No draft ordinance, enforcement standards, implementation schedule, staffing plan, or cost is attached. The report therefore does not claim adoption of new penalties, a registry, or a final City Council action.

4 and 7 — Presentation and progress report

Landmarks Illinois is scheduled to present on preservation and revitalization; the Commission also has a progress check-in. Both are represented in the complete written table, but neither contains a concrete current discretionary approval or named future contract recommendation in the supplied packet.

Last generated: November 1, 2026 at 12:03 PM CST